scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

HealthcareMadrid, Spain
About: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón is a healthcare organization based out in Madrid, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 11975 authors who have published 12386 publications receiving 244847 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Florian Götzinger, Begoña Santiago-García1, Antoni Noguera-Julian, Miguel Lanaspa2, Laura Lancella3, Francesca Ippolita Calò Carducci3, Natalia Gabrovska4, Svetlana Velizarova4, Petra Prunk5, Veronika Osterman5, Uros Krivec5, Andrea Lo Vecchio6, Delane Shingadia7, Delane Shingadia8, Antoni Soriano-Arandes, Susana Melendo, Marcello Lanari, Luca Pierantoni, Noémie Wagner9, Arnaud G L'Huillier9, Ulrich Heininger3, Nicole Ritz3, Nicole Ritz10, Srini Bandi3, Nina Krajcar, Srđan Roglić, Mar Santos1, Christelle Christiaens, Marine Creuven, Danilo Buonsenso, Steven B. Welch, Matthias Bogyi, Folke Brinkmann11, Marc Tebruegge8, Marc Tebruegge10, Marc Tebruegge12, Jasmin Pfefferle, Angela Zacharasiewicz, Angelika Berger, Roland Berger, Volker Strenger, Daniela S. Kohlfürst, Anna Zschocke, Benoît Bernar, Burkhard Simma, Edda Haberlandt, Christina Thir, Ariane Biebl, Koen Vanden Driessche, Tine Boiy, Daan Van Brusselen, An Bael, Sara Debulpaep, Petra Schelstraete, Ivan Pavic, Ulrikka Nygaard, Jonathan P. Glenthoej, Lise Heilmann Jensen, Ilona Lind, Mihhail Tistsenko, Ulle Uustalu, Laura Buchtala, Stephanie Thee, Robin Kobbe, Cornelius Rau, Nicolaus Schwerk, Michael Barker, Maria Tsolia, Irini Eleftheriou, Patrick Gavin, Oksana Kozdoba, Borbàla Zsigmond, Piero Valentini13, Piero Valentini14, Inga Ivaškeviciene, Rimvydas Ivaškevicius, Valentina Vilc, Elisabeth Schölvinck, Astrid Rojahn15, Anastasios Smyrnaios, Claus Klingenberg, Isabel Carvalho, Andreia Ribeiro, Anna Starshinova, Ivan Solovic, Lola Falcón, Olaf Neth, Laura Minguell, Matilde Bustillo, Aida M. Gutiérrez-Sánchez, Borja Ibanez, Francesc Ripoll, Beatriz Soto, Karsten Kötz, Petra Zimmermann16, Hanna Schmid, Franziska Zucol, Anita Niederer, Michael Buettcher, Benhur Şirvan Çetin, Olga Bilogortseva, Vera Chechenyeva, Alicia Demirjian, Fiona Shackley, Lynne McFetridge, Lynne Speirs, Conor Doherty, Laura Jones, Paddy McMaster, Clare S. Murray, Frances Child, Yvonne Beuvink, Nick Makwana, Elisabeth Whittaker, Amanda Williams, Katy Fidler, Jolanta Bernatoniene, R Song, Zoe Oliver, Andrew Riordan 
TL;DR: Key data on children and adolescents with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection across Europe to inform physicians and health-care service planning during the ongoing pandemic are captured to reflect the current uncertainties regarding specific treatment options.

918 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This document focuses in particular on the optimization of left ventricular outflow tract assessment, low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction, and a grading algorithm for an integrated and stepwise approach of aorti stenosis assessment in clinical practice.
Abstract: Echocardiography is the key tool for the diagnosis and evaluation of aortic stenosis. Because clinical decision-making is based on the echocardiographic assessment of its severity, it is essential that standards are adopted to maintain accuracy and consistency across echocardiographic laboratories. Detailed recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis were published by the European Association of Echocardiography and the American Society of Echocardiography in 2009. In the meantime, numerous new studies on aortic stenosis have been published with particular new insights into the difficult subgroup of low gradient aortic stenosis making an update of recommendations necessary. The document focuses in particular on the optimization of left ventricular outflow tract assessment, low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction, a new classification of aortic stenosis by gradient, flow and ejection fraction, and a grading algorithm for an integrated and stepwise approach of aortic stenosis assessment in clinical practice.

884 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The aim of this paper was to detail the recommended approach to the echocardiographic evaluation of valve stenosis, including recommendations for specific measures of stenosis severity, details of data acquisition and measurement, and grading of severity.
Abstract: AR = aortic regurgitation AS = aortic stenosis AVA = aortic valve area CSA = cross sectional area CWD = continuous wave Doppler D = diameter HOCM = hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy LV = left ventricle LVOT = left ventricular outflow tract MR = mitral regurgitation MS = mitral stenosis MVA = mitral valve area ΔP = pressure gradient RV = right ventricle RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract SV = stroke volume TEE = transesophageal echocardiography T 1/2 = pressure half-time TR = tricuspid regurgitation TS = tricuspid stenosis V = velocity VSD = ventricular septal defect VTI =velocity time integral Valve stenosis is a common heart disorder and an important cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography has become the key tool for the diagnosis and evaluation of valve disease, and is the primary non-invasive imaging method for valve stenosis assessment. Clinical decision-making is based on echocardiographic assessment of the severity of valve stenosis, so it is essential that standards be adopted to maintain accuracy and consistency across echocardiographic laboratories when assessing and reporting valve stenosis. The aim of this paper was to detail the recommended approach to the echocardiographic evaluation of valve stenosis, including recommendations for specific measures of stenosis severity, details of data acquisition and measurement, and grading of severity. These recommendations are based on the scientific literature and on the consensus of a panel of experts. This document discusses a number of proposed methods for evaluation of stenosis severity. On the basis of a comprehensive literature review and expert consensus, these methods were categorized for clinical practice as:

846 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Oliver A. Cornely, Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo1, Dorothee Arenz2, Sharon C.-A. Chen3, Eric Dannaoui4, Bruno Hochhegger5, Bruno Hochhegger6, Martin Hoenigl7, Martin Hoenigl8, Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen9, Katrien Lagrou10, Russell E. Lewis11, Sibylle C. Mellinghoff2, Mervyn Mer12, Zoi D. Pana13, Danila Seidel2, Donald C. Sheppard14, Roger Wahba2, Murat Akova15, Alexandre Alanio16, Abdullah M. S. Al-Hatmi17, Sevtap Arikan-Akdagli15, Hamid Badali18, Ronen Ben-Ami19, Alexandro Bonifaz20, Stéphane Bretagne16, Elio Castagnola21, Methee Chayakulkeeree22, Arnaldo Lopes Colombo23, Dora E. Corzo-Leon24, Lubos Drgona25, Andreas H. Groll26, Jesús Guinea27, Jesús Guinea28, Claus Peter Heussel29, Ashraf S. Ibrahim30, Souha S. Kanj31, Nikolay Klimko, Michaela Lackner32, Frédéric Lamoth33, Fanny Lanternier4, Cornelia Lass-Floerl32, Dong-Gun Lee34, Thomas Lehrnbecher35, Badre E. Lmimouni, Mihai Mares, Georg Maschmeyer, Jacques F. Meis, Joseph Meletiadis36, Joseph Meletiadis37, C. Orla Morrissey38, Marcio Nucci39, Rita O. Oladele, Livio Pagano40, Alessandro C. Pasqualotto41, Atul Patel, Zdenek Racil, Malcolm Richardson, Emmanuel Roilides13, Markus Ruhnke, Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi18, Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi42, Neeraj Sidharthan43, Nina Singh44, Janos Sinko, Anna Skiada36, Monica A. Slavin45, Monica A. Slavin46, Rajeev Soman47, Brad Spellberg48, William J. Steinbach49, Ban Hock Tan50, Andrew J. Ullmann, Joerg J. Vehreschild35, Maria J G T Vehreschild35, Thomas J. Walsh51, P. Lewis White52, Nathan P. Wiederhold53, Theoklis E. Zaoutis54, Arunaloke Chakrabarti55 
Carlos III Health Institute1, University of Cologne2, University of Sydney3, Paris Descartes University4, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul5, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre6, Medical University of Graz7, University of California, San Diego8, University of Copenhagen9, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven10, University of Bologna11, University of the Witwatersrand12, RMIT University13, McGill University14, Hacettepe University15, University of Paris16, Utrecht University17, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences18, Tel Aviv University19, Hospital General de México20, Istituto Giannina Gaslini21, Mahidol University22, Federal University of São Paulo23, King's College, Aberdeen24, Comenius University in Bratislava25, Boston Children's Hospital26, Complutense University of Madrid27, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón28, University Hospital Heidelberg29, University of California, Los Angeles30, American University of Beirut31, Innsbruck Medical University32, University of Lausanne33, Catholic University of Korea34, Goethe University Frankfurt35, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens36, Erasmus University Rotterdam37, Monash University38, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro39, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart40, University of Health Sciences Antigua41, National Institutes of Health42, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre43, University of Pittsburgh44, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre45, University of Melbourne46, P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre47, University of Southern California48, Duke University49, Singapore General Hospital50, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital51, Cardiff University52, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio53, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia54, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research55
TL;DR: Management of mucormycosis depends on recognising disease patterns and on early diagnosis, and limited availability of contemporary treatments burdens patients in low and middle income settings.
Abstract: Mucormycosis is a difficult to diagnose rare disease with high morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is often delayed, and disease tends to progress rapidly. Urgent surgical and medical intervention is lifesaving. Guidance on the complex multidisciplinary management has potential to improve prognosis, but approaches differ between health-care settings. From January, 2018, authors from 33 countries in all United Nations regions analysed the published evidence on mucormycosis management and provided consensus recommendations addressing differences between the regions of the world as part of the "One World One Guideline" initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM). Diagnostic management does not differ greatly between world regions. Upon suspicion of mucormycosis appropriate imaging is strongly recommended to document extent of disease and is followed by strongly recommended surgical intervention. First-line treatment with high-dose liposomal amphotericin B is strongly recommended, while intravenous isavuconazole and intravenous or delayed release tablet posaconazole are recommended with moderate strength. Both triazoles are strongly recommended salvage treatments. Amphotericin B deoxycholate is recommended against, because of substantial toxicity, but may be the only option in resource limited settings. Management of mucormycosis depends on recognising disease patterns and on early diagnosis. Limited availability of contemporary treatments burdens patients in low and middle income settings. Areas of uncertainty were identified and future research directions specified.

842 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The requirements and the methodological issues to be addressed for using ABPM in clinical practice are addressed, the clinical indications for ABPM suggested by the available studies are outlined in detail, and the place of home measurement of blood pressure in relation to ABPM is discussed.
Abstract: Given the increasing use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in both clinical practice and hypertension research, a group of scientists, participating in the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on blood pressure monitoring and cardiovascular variability, in year 2013 published a comprehensive position paper dealing with all aspects of the technique, based on the available scientific evidence for ABPM. The present work represents an updated schematic summary of the most important aspects related to the use of ABPM in daily practice, and is aimed at providing recommendations for proper use of this technique in a clinical setting by both specialists and practicing physicians. The present article details the requirements and the methodological issues to be addressed for using ABPM in clinical practice, The clinical indications for ABPM suggested by the available studies, among which white-coat phenomena, masked hypertension, and nocturnal hypertension, are outlined in detail, and the place of home measurement of blood pressure in relation to ABPM is discussed. The role of ABPM in pharmacological, epidemiological, and clinical research is also briefly mentioned. Finally, the implementation of ABPM in practice is considered in relation to the situation of different countries with regard to the reimbursement and the availability of ABPM in primary care practices, hospital clinics, and pharmacies.

786 citations


Authors

Showing all 12014 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David H. Adams1551613117783
Stefanie Dimmeler14757481658
Stuart J. Pocock145684143547
M. I. Martínez134125179885
Guy A. Rouleau12988465892
Jose L. Jimenez12465464226
Antoni Torres120123865049
Paul P. Tak11259157689
Luis A. Diaz11159675036
Frans Van de Werf10974763537
José Luis Zamorano105695133396
Francisco Sánchez-Madrid10252743418
Francesco Locatelli9982042454
Roberto M. Lang9682356638
Carlos Simón9558931147
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University Medical Center Groningen
30.3K papers, 967K citations

85% related

VU University Medical Center
22.9K papers, 1.1M citations

84% related

Autonomous University of Barcelona
80.5K papers, 2.3M citations

84% related

Leiden University Medical Center
38K papers, 1.6M citations

83% related

Hannover Medical School
27.4K papers, 1M citations

83% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202317
202246
20211,186
20201,045
2019898
2018637