Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

About: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón is a healthcare organization based out in Madrid, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 11975 authors who have published 12386 publications receiving 244847 citations.

The Fluid Aspect of the Mediterranean Diet in the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes: The Role of Polyphenol Content in Moderate Consumption of Wine and Olive Oil.

Abstract: A growing interest has emerged in the beneficial effects of plant-based diets for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity. The Mediterranean diet, one of the most widely evaluated dietary patterns in scientific literature, includes in its nutrients two fluid foods: olive oil, as the main source of fats, and a low-to-moderate consumption of wine, mainly red, particularly during meals. Current mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of the Mediterranean diet include a reduction in inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, improvement in lipid profile, insulin sensitivity and endothelial function, as well as antithrombotic properties. Most of these effects are attributable to bioactive ingredients including polyphenols, mono- and poly-unsaturated fatty acids. Polyphenols are a heterogeneous group of phytochemicals containing phenol rings. The principal classes of red wine polyphenols include flavonols (quercetin and myricetin), flavanols (catechin and epicatechin), anthocyanin and stilbenes (resveratrol). Olive oil has at least 30 phenolic compounds. Among them, the main are simple phenols (tyrosol and hydroxytyrosol), secoroids and lignans. The present narrative review focuses on phenols, part of red wine and virgin olive oil, discussing the evidence of their effects on lipids, blood pressure, atheromatous plaque and glucose metabolism.

The role of cardiac registries in evidence-based medicine.

Abstract: Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of mortality, and a major cause of disability in the developed world.1 This significant burden necessitates ongoing improvements in patient management, to minimize the impact of cardiovascular conditions on both patients and healthcare systems. These improvements in cardiovascular care are promoted by an evidence-based approach, shaped by comprehensive clinical guidelines. The scientific basis of recommendations is an important feature of clinical guidelines, and influences the degree to which they are followed in clinical practice.2 Recent studies have assigned the highest evidence grading to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that are clinically important, and representative of the clinical population covered by the guideline recommendation.3 For example, this highest grading was assigned to a recommendation based on a meta-analysis of RCTs showing low-dose diuretics to be the most effective first-line treatment for cardiovascular event prevention in hypertensive patients. This study reviewed data from 42 RCTs which were, crucially, representative of the population that the recommendation was made for (i.e. hypertensive patients).3,4 The importance of the applicability of evidence to recommendations highlights the need to consider evidence from clinically relevant situations, not all of which have been assessed by RCTs. This evidence can originate from expert consensus, as well as non-randomized prospective studies. Although generally providing a lower evidence-level than RCTs,3,5 observational studies can make an important contribution to the evidence base when the study outcomes are clinically important, and the populations involved are representative. Indeed, information from several registries was considered in the recent American Heart Association Acute Coronary Care in the Elderly Scientific Statement.6 Non-randomized prospective registries document the treatment and outcomes for consecutive patients in clinical practice. Therefore, data are gained from a ‘real-world’ selection of patients, many of whom would be excluded from RCTs, …

Impact of Frailty on Mortality and Hospitalization in Chronic Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Abstract: Background Although frailty has been associated with increased risks for hospitalization and mortality in chronic heart failure, the precise average effect remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the hazards for mortality and incident hospitalization in patients with heart failure and frailty compared with those without frailty and explored the heterogeneity underlying the effect size estimates. Methods and Results MEDLINE , EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were queried for articles published between January 1966 and March 2018. Predefined selection criteria were used. Hazard ratios ( HRs ) were pooled for meta-analyses, and where odds ratios were used previously, original data were recalculated for HR . Overlapping data were consolidated, and only unique data points were used. Study quality and bias were assessed. Eight studies were included for mortality (2645 patients), and 6 studies were included for incident hospitalization (2541 patients) during a median follow-up of 1.82 and 1.12 years, respectively. Frailty was significantly associated with an increased hazard for mortality ( HR , 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.75; P<0.001) and incident hospitalization ( HR , 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-1.78; P<0.001) in chronic heart failure. The Fried phenotype estimated a 16.9% larger effect size than the combined Fried/non-Fried frailty assessment for the end point of mortality ( HR , 1.80; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.28; P<0.001), but not for hospitalization ( HR , 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.89; P<0.001). Study heterogeneity was found to be low (I2=0%), and high quality of studies was verified by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Conclusions Overall, the presence of frailty in chronic heart failure is associated with an increased hazard for death and hospitalization by ≈1.5-fold.