Institution
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Nonprofit•Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States•
About: Howard Hughes Medical Institute is a nonprofit organization based out in Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Gene & RNA. The organization has 20371 authors who have published 34677 publications receiving 5247143 citations. The organization is also known as: HHMI & hhmi.org.
Topics: Gene, RNA, Population, Cellular differentiation, Transcription factor
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Genetic and genomic analysis suggests that a relatively small number of output genes are directly regulated by core oscillator components, and major processes regulated by the SCN and liver were found to be under circadian regulation.
2,227 citations
••
University of Paris-Sud1, French Institute of Health and Medical Research2, Institut Gustave Roussy3, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai4, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center5, Thomas Jefferson University6, McMaster University7, University of Massachusetts Medical School8, LSU Health Sciences Center New Orleans9, Roswell Park Cancer Institute10, University of Gothenburg11, Boston Children's Hospital12, University of Freiburg13, Buck Institute for Research on Aging14, University of California, San Francisco15, Centre national de la recherche scientifique16, National Institutes of Health17, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology18, University of Leicester19, University of Chieti-Pescara20, Istituto Superiore di Sanità21, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill22, New York University23, University of Pennsylvania24, Yale University25, Howard Hughes Medical Institute26, University of Ulm27, University of Burgundy28, Aix-Marseille University29, Pasteur Institute30, University of Strasbourg31, Johns Hopkins University32, University of Zurich33, University of Tokyo34, Weizmann Institute of Science35, University of Michigan36, University College London37, Duke University38, University of Graz39, Ghent University40, Trinity College, Dublin41, University of Amsterdam42, University of Lyon43, University of Rome Tor Vergata44, Stony Brook University45, University of Göttingen46, Kyoto University47, Merck & Co.48, Austrian Academy of Sciences49, National University of Singapore50, University of Chicago51, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland52, La Trobe University53, University of Buenos Aires54, University of Padua55, University of Lisbon56, University of Cambridge57, University of Würzburg58, University of Geneva59, University of Bern60, Rockefeller University61, University of Lausanne62, Osaka University63, University of California, San Diego64, University of Glasgow65, Harvard University66, Karolinska Institutet67
TL;DR: A nonexhaustive comparison of methods to detect cell death with apoptotic or nonapoptotic morphologies, their advantages and pitfalls is provided and the importance of performing multiple, methodologically unrelated assays to quantify dying and dead cells is emphasized.
Abstract: Cell death is essential for a plethora of physiological processes, and its deregulation characterizes numerous human diseases Thus, the in-depth investigation of cell death and its mechanisms constitutes a formidable challenge for fundamental and applied biomedical research, and has tremendous implications for the development of novel therapeutic strategies It is, therefore, of utmost importance to standardize the experimental procedures that identify dying and dead cells in cell cultures and/or in tissues, from model organisms and/or humans, in healthy and/or pathological scenarios Thus far, dozens of methods have been proposed to quantify cell death-related parameters However, no guidelines exist regarding their use and interpretation, and nobody has thoroughly annotated the experimental settings for which each of these techniques is most appropriate Here, we provide a nonexhaustive comparison of methods to detect cell death with apoptotic or nonapoptotic morphologies, their advantages and pitfalls These guidelines are intended for investigators who study cell death, as well as for reviewers who need to constructively critique scientific reports that deal with cellular demise Given the difficulties in determining the exact number of cells that have passed the point-of-no-return of the signaling cascades leading to cell death, we emphasize the importance of performing multiple, methodologically unrelated assays to quantify dying and dead cells
2,218 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated patients with long QT syndrome (LQT), an inherited disorder causing sudden death from a ventricular tachyarrythmia, torsade de pointes.
2,207 citations
••
TL;DR: The generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with a variety of genetic diseases with either Mendelian or complex inheritance are described, offering an unprecedented opportunity to recapitulate both normal and pathologic human tissue formation in vitro, thereby enabling disease investigation and drug development.
2,195 citations
••
TL;DR: P27 Kip1 as mentioned in this paper is a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor implicated in G1 phase arrest by TGFβ and cell-cell contact, and it has been shown to be highly conserved and broadly expressed in human tissues, and its mRNA levels are similar in proliferating and quiescent cells.
2,194 citations
Authors
Showing all 20486 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Bert Vogelstein | 247 | 757 | 332094 |
Richard A. Flavell | 231 | 1328 | 205119 |
Steven A. Rosenberg | 218 | 1204 | 199262 |
Kenneth W. Kinzler | 215 | 640 | 243944 |
Robert J. Lefkowitz | 214 | 860 | 147995 |
Rob Knight | 201 | 1061 | 253207 |
Irving L. Weissman | 201 | 1141 | 172504 |
Ronald M. Evans | 199 | 708 | 166722 |
Francis S. Collins | 196 | 743 | 250787 |
Craig B. Thompson | 195 | 557 | 173172 |
Thomas C. Südhof | 191 | 653 | 118007 |
Joan Massagué | 189 | 408 | 149951 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
John P. A. Ioannidis | 185 | 1311 | 193612 |
Eric R. Kandel | 184 | 603 | 113560 |