Institution
Hungarian National Museum
Archive•Budapest, Hungary•
About: Hungarian National Museum is a(n) archive organization based out in Budapest, Hungary. It is known for research contribution in the topic(s): Population & Chalcolithic. The organization has 70 authors who have published 106 publication(s) receiving 2223 citation(s). The organization is also known as: Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum.
Topics: Population, Chalcolithic, Bronze Age, Prehistory, Pottery
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
University of Copenhagen1, University of Gothenburg2, Technical University of Denmark3, Leiden University4, Lund University5, University of Oxford6, University of Wrocław7, University of Zurich8, Wrocław Medical University9, University of Toronto10, Gorno-Altaisk State University11, South Ural State University12, Polish Academy of Sciences13, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich14, Eötvös Loránd University15, Hungarian Natural History Museum16, Hungarian Academy of Sciences17, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic18, Masaryk University19, University of Tartu20, Yerevan State University21, University of Szeged22, Hungarian National Museum23, University of Wisconsin-Madison24, Russian Academy of Sciences25, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague26, Armenian National Academy of Sciences27, Moscow State University28, University of California, Berkeley29
TL;DR: It is shown that the Bronze Age was a highly dynamic period involving large-scale population migrations and replacements, responsible for shaping major parts of present-day demographic structure in both Europe and Asia.
Abstract: The Bronze Age of Eurasia (around 3000-1000 BC) was a period of major cultural changes. However, there is debate about whether these changes resulted from the circulation of ideas or from human migrations, potentially also facilitating the spread of languages and certain phenotypic traits. We investigated this by using new, improved methods to sequence low-coverage genomes from 101 ancient humans from across Eurasia. We show that the Bronze Age was a highly dynamic period involving large-scale population migrations and replacements, responsible for shaping major parts of present-day demographic structure in both Europe and Asia. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesized spread of Indo-European languages during the Early Bronze Age. We also demonstrate that light skin pigmentation in Europeans was already present at high frequency in the Bronze Age, but not lactose tolerance, indicating a more recent onset of positive selection on lactose tolerance than previously thought.
882 citations
Harvard University1, Hungarian Academy of Sciences2, Broad Institute3, University of Mainz4, Howard Hughes Medical Institute5, University of Adelaide6, Eötvös Loránd University7, Hungarian National Museum8, University of Pécs9, University of the Basque Country10, Free University of Berlin11, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut12, Danube Private University13, University of Basel14, Spanish National Research Council15, Max Planck Society16
TL;DR: Investigating the population dynamics of Neolithization across Europe using a high-resolution genome-wide ancient DNA dataset with a total of 180 samples finds that genetic diversity was shaped predominantly by local processes, with varied sources and proportions of hunter-gatherer ancestry among the three regions and through time.
Abstract: In European Neolithic populations, the arrival of farmers prompted admixture with local hunter-gatherers over many centuries, resulting in distinct signatures in each region due to a complex series of interactions. David Reich and colleagues analyse genome-wide data from 180 individuals from the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods of Hungary, Germany and Spain to study the population dynamics of Neolithization in European prehistory. They examine how gene flow reshaped European populations during the Neolithic period, including pervasive admixture—the interbreeding between previously isolated populations—between groups with different ancestry profiles. In each region, they find that the arrival of farmers prompted admixture with local hunter-gatherers, over the course of 3,000 years. Ancient DNA studies have established that Neolithic European populations were descended from Anatolian migrants1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 who received a limited amount of admixture from resident hunter-gatherers3,4,5,9. Many open questions remain, however, about the spatial and temporal dynamics of population interactions and admixture during the Neolithic period. Here we investigate the population dynamics of Neolithization across Europe using a high-resolution genome-wide ancient DNA dataset with a total of 180 samples, of which 130 are newly reported here, from the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods of Hungary (6000–2900 bc, n = 100), Germany (5500–3000 bc, n = 42) and Spain (5500–2200 bc, n = 38). We find that genetic diversity was shaped predominantly by local processes, with varied sources and proportions of hunter-gatherer ancestry among the three regions and through time. Admixture between groups with different ancestry profiles was pervasive and resulted in observable population transformation across almost all cultural transitions. Our results shed new light on the ways in which gene flow reshaped European populations throughout the Neolithic period and demonstrate the potential of time-series-based sampling and modelling approaches to elucidate multiple dimensions of historical population interactions.
204 citations
University of Mainz1, Hungarian Academy of Sciences2, University of Adelaide3, University of Szeged4, Eötvös Loránd University5, Salisbury University6, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts7, University College Dublin8, University of Zagreb9, Hungarian National Museum10, University of West Hungary11
TL;DR: Comprehensive Y chromosomal and mitochondrial DNA population genetic analyses demonstrate a clear affinity of the early farmers to the modern Near East and Caucasus, tracing the expansion from that region through southeastern Europe and the Carpathian Basin into Central Europe.
Abstract: Farming was established in Central Europe by the Linearbandkeramik culture (LBK), a well-investigated archaeological horizon, which emerged in the Carpathian Basin, in today's Hungary. However, the...
120 citations
Abstract: This paper presents an overview of the use of Proboscidean remains in every day Palaeolithic life, in an attempt to illuminate some aspects of the relationship between Proboscideans and humans during the Palaeolithic from an archaeological perspective. A short survey of the evidence is given, focussing on the associations of lithic tools and Proboscidean remains and the utilisation of Proboscidean remains to produce bone tools, objects of art and personal decoration and dwellings. The evidence is compiled and general trends in the archaeological record are outlined.
91 citations
Abstract: An integration of geophysical surveys, ground hyperspectral data, aerial photographs and high resolution satellite imagery for supporting archaeological investigations at the multi-component Vesztő-Magor Tell, located in the southeastern Great Hungarian Plain, is presented in this study. This is one of the first times that all these techniques have been combined and evaluated for retrieving archaeological information. Geophysical explorations, specifically magnetic gradiometry and ground penetrating radar methods, have revealed shallow linear anomalies and curvilinear rings at the Tell. The use of remote sensing images has confirmed the diverse anomalies with respect to geophysics through photointerpretation, radiometric and spatial enhancements. Moreover, several indices from ground hyperspectral data also have revealed stress vegetation anomalies. These integrated results were used to map the main areas of archaeological interest at the Vesztő-Magor Tell and plan future excavations. It was found that these multiscalar data can be used efficiently for detecting buried archaeological features.
59 citations
Authors
Showing all 70 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Attila Gyucha | 11 | 13 | 300 |
Katalin T. Biró | 10 | 35 | 309 |
Ákos Pető | 8 | 15 | 142 |
László Paja | 7 | 20 | 971 |
Zsuzsa Lisztes-Szabó | 6 | 24 | 124 |
Attila Kreiter | 5 | 22 | 84 |
András Markó | 5 | 9 | 96 |
Szilvia Fábián | 5 | 6 | 266 |
Péter Pánczél | 4 | 4 | 31 |
Vanda Voicsek | 4 | 4 | 224 |
Árpád Kenéz | 4 | 13 | 72 |
Zsuzsa Hajnal | 3 | 4 | 75 |
Brigitta Ősz | 3 | 3 | 151 |
Orsolya Viktorik | 3 | 7 | 16 |
Zsófia Eszter Kovács | 3 | 3 | 48 |