Institution
Hungarian National Museum
Archive•Budapest, Hungary•
About: Hungarian National Museum is a archive organization based out in Budapest, Hungary. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Chalcolithic. The organization has 70 authors who have published 106 publications receiving 2223 citations. The organization is also known as: Magyar Nemzeti Múzeum.
Topics: Population, Chalcolithic, Bronze Age, Prehistory, Pottery
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Copenhagen1, University of Gothenburg2, Technical University of Denmark3, Leiden University4, Lund University5, University of Oxford6, University of Wrocław7, University of Zurich8, Wrocław Medical University9, University of Toronto10, Gorno-Altaisk State University11, South Ural State University12, Polish Academy of Sciences13, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich14, Eötvös Loránd University15, Hungarian Natural History Museum16, Hungarian Academy of Sciences17, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic18, Masaryk University19, University of Tartu20, Yerevan State University21, University of Szeged22, Hungarian National Museum23, University of Wisconsin-Madison24, Russian Academy of Sciences25, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague26, Armenian National Academy of Sciences27, Moscow State University28, University of California, Berkeley29
TL;DR: It is shown that the Bronze Age was a highly dynamic period involving large-scale population migrations and replacements, responsible for shaping major parts of present-day demographic structure in both Europe and Asia.
Abstract: The Bronze Age of Eurasia (around 3000-1000 BC) was a period of major cultural changes. However, there is debate about whether these changes resulted from the circulation of ideas or from human migrations, potentially also facilitating the spread of languages and certain phenotypic traits. We investigated this by using new, improved methods to sequence low-coverage genomes from 101 ancient humans from across Eurasia. We show that the Bronze Age was a highly dynamic period involving large-scale population migrations and replacements, responsible for shaping major parts of present-day demographic structure in both Europe and Asia. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesized spread of Indo-European languages during the Early Bronze Age. We also demonstrate that light skin pigmentation in Europeans was already present at high frequency in the Bronze Age, but not lactose tolerance, indicating a more recent onset of positive selection on lactose tolerance than previously thought.
1,088 citations
••
Harvard University1, Hungarian Academy of Sciences2, Broad Institute3, University of Mainz4, Howard Hughes Medical Institute5, University of Adelaide6, Eötvös Loránd University7, Hungarian National Museum8, University of Pécs9, University of the Basque Country10, Free University of Berlin11, Deutsches Archäologisches Institut12, University of Basel13, Danube Private University14, Spanish National Research Council15, Max Planck Society16
TL;DR: Investigating the population dynamics of Neolithization across Europe using a high-resolution genome-wide ancient DNA dataset with a total of 180 samples finds that genetic diversity was shaped predominantly by local processes, with varied sources and proportions of hunter-gatherer ancestry among the three regions and through time.
Abstract: In European Neolithic populations, the arrival of farmers prompted admixture with local hunter-gatherers over many centuries, resulting in distinct signatures in each region due to a complex series of interactions. David Reich and colleagues analyse genome-wide data from 180 individuals from the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods of Hungary, Germany and Spain to study the population dynamics of Neolithization in European prehistory. They examine how gene flow reshaped European populations during the Neolithic period, including pervasive admixture—the interbreeding between previously isolated populations—between groups with different ancestry profiles. In each region, they find that the arrival of farmers prompted admixture with local hunter-gatherers, over the course of 3,000 years. Ancient DNA studies have established that Neolithic European populations were descended from Anatolian migrants1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 who received a limited amount of admixture from resident hunter-gatherers3,4,5,9. Many open questions remain, however, about the spatial and temporal dynamics of population interactions and admixture during the Neolithic period. Here we investigate the population dynamics of Neolithization across Europe using a high-resolution genome-wide ancient DNA dataset with a total of 180 samples, of which 130 are newly reported here, from the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods of Hungary (6000–2900 bc, n = 100), Germany (5500–3000 bc, n = 42) and Spain (5500–2200 bc, n = 38). We find that genetic diversity was shaped predominantly by local processes, with varied sources and proportions of hunter-gatherer ancestry among the three regions and through time. Admixture between groups with different ancestry profiles was pervasive and resulted in observable population transformation across almost all cultural transitions. Our results shed new light on the ways in which gene flow reshaped European populations throughout the Neolithic period and demonstrate the potential of time-series-based sampling and modelling approaches to elucidate multiple dimensions of historical population interactions.
278 citations
••
University of Mainz1, Hungarian Academy of Sciences2, University of Adelaide3, University of Szeged4, Eötvös Loránd University5, Salisbury University6, Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts7, University College Dublin8, University of Zagreb9, Hungarian National Museum10, University of West Hungary11
TL;DR: Comprehensive Y chromosomal and mitochondrial DNA population genetic analyses demonstrate a clear affinity of the early farmers to the modern Near East and Caucasus, tracing the expansion from that region through southeastern Europe and the Carpathian Basin into Central Europe.
Abstract: Farming was established in Central Europe by the Linearbandkeramik culture (LBK), a well-investigated archaeological horizon, which emerged in the Carpathian Basin, in today's Hungary. However, the...
131 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, an overview of the use of Proboscidean remains in every day Palaeolithic life is presented, in an attempt to illuminate some aspects of the relationship between proboscideans and humans from an archaeological perspective.
95 citations
••
TL;DR: A novel cranial base drilling method for accessing the osseous labyrinth from the Cranial base that prevents damaging the surrounding cranial features, making it highly complementary to morphological analyses and enables the combined craniometric and genetic study of individuals with archeological, cultural, and evolutionary value.
Abstract: Ancient DNA (aDNA) research involves invasive and destructive sampling procedures that are often incompatible with anthropological, anatomical, and bioarcheological analyses requiring intact skeletal remains. The osseous labyrinth inside the petrous bone has been shown to yield higher amounts of endogenous DNA than any other skeletal element; however, accessing this labyrinth in cases of a complete or reconstructed skull involves causing major structural damage to the cranial vault or base. Here, we describe a novel cranial base drilling method (CBDM) for accessing the osseous labyrinth from the cranial base that prevents damaging the surrounding cranial features, making it highly complementary to morphological analyses. We assessed this method by comparing the aDNA results from one petrous bone processed using our novel method to its pair, which was processed using established protocols for sampling disarticulated petrous bones. We show a decrease in endogenous DNA and molecular copy numbers when the drilling method is used; however, we also show that this method produces more endogenous DNA and higher copy numbers than any postcranial bone. Our results demonstrate that this minimally-invasive method reduces the loss of genetic data associated with the use of other skeletal elements and enables the combined craniometric and genetic study of individuals with archeological, cultural, and evolutionary value.
70 citations
Authors
Showing all 73 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
János Gábor Tarbay | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Brigitta Osz | 1 | 1 | 10 |
Andrea Várfalvi | 1 | 1 | 1 |
L. Vértes | 1 | 1 | 9 |
Orsolya Friedel | 1 | 1 | 21 |
Ágnes Ritoók | 1 | 3 | 6 |
Szabolcs Czifra | 1 | 2 | 7 |
M. Kretzoi | 1 | 1 | 9 |
Zsolt Mráv | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Zsófia Ács | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Melinda Torbágyi | 1 | 3 | 2 |
Loránd Olivér Kovács | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Ádám Szabó | 1 | 1 | 2 |
László Vértes | 1 | 1 | 7 |
L. Reményi | 1 | 1 | 5 |