Institution
IBM
Company•Armonk, New York, United States•
About: IBM is a company organization based out in Armonk, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Layer (electronics) & Cache. The organization has 134567 authors who have published 253905 publications receiving 7458795 citations. The organization is also known as: International Business Machines Corporation & Big Blue.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
IBM1
TL;DR: Stochastic gradient descent algorithms on regularized forms of linear prediction methods, related to online algorithms such as perceptron, are studied, and numerical rate of convergence for such algorithms is obtained.
Abstract: Linear prediction methods, such as least squares for regression, logistic regression and support vector machines for classification, have been extensively used in statistics and machine learning. In this paper, we study stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms on regularized forms of linear prediction methods. This class of methods, related to online algorithms such as perceptron, are both efficient and very simple to implement. We obtain numerical rate of convergence for such algorithms, and discuss its implications. Experiments on text data will be provided to demonstrate numerical and statistical consequences of our theoretical findings.
1,182 citations
••
16 Aug 1992TL;DR: This paper considers the model where interaction is allowed in the common key computation phase, and shows a gap between the models by exhibiting an interactive scheme in which the user's information is only k + t - 1 times the size of the commonKey.
Abstract: A key distribution scheme for dynamic conferences is a method by which initially an (off-line) trusted server distributes private individual pieces of information to a set of users. Later any group of users of a given size (a dynamic conference) is able to compute a common secure key. In this paper we study the theory and applications of such perfectly secure systems. In this setting, any group of t users can compute a common key by each user computing using only his private piece of information and the identities of the other t - 1 group users. Keys are secure against coalitions of up to k users, that is, even if k users pool together their pieces they cannot compute anything about a key of any t-size conference comprised of other users.First we consider a non-interactive model where users compute the common key without any interaction. We prove a lower hound on the size of the user's piece of information of (k+t-1 t-1) times the size of the common key. We then establish the optimality of this bound, by describing and analyzing a scheme which exactly meets this limitation (the construction extends the one in [2]). Then, we consider the model where interaction is allowed in the common key computation phase, and show a gap between the models by exhibiting an interactive scheme in which the user's information is only k + t - 1 times the size of the common key. We further show various applications and useful modifications of our basic scheme. Finally, we present its adaptation to network topologies with neighborhood constraints.
1,181 citations
••
1,181 citations
••
IBM1
TL;DR: Non-malleable schemes for each of the contexts of string commitment and zero-knowledge proofs of possession of knowledge, where a user need not know anything about the number or identity of other system users are presented.
Abstract: The notion of non-malleable cryptography, an extension of semantically secure cryptography, is defined. Informally, the additional requirement is that given the ciphertext it is impossible to generate a different ciphertext so that the respective plaintexts are related. The same concept makes sense in the contexts of string commitment and zero-knowledge proofs of possession of knowledge. Non-malleable schemes for each of these three problems are presented. The schemes do not assume a trusted center; a user need not know anything about the number or identity of other system users.
1,180 citations
••
TL;DR: The capability maturity model (CMM), developed to present sets of recommended practices in a number of key process areas that have been shown to enhance software-development and maintenance capability, is discussed.
Abstract: The capability maturity model (CMM), developed to present sets of recommended practices in a number of key process areas that have been shown to enhance software-development and maintenance capability, is discussed. The CMM was designed to help developers select process-improvement strategies by determining their current process maturity and identifying the issues most critical to improving their software quality and process. The initial release of the CMM, version 1.0, was reviewed and used by the software community during 1991 and 1992. A workshop on CMM 1.0, held in April 1992, was attended by about 200 software professionals. The current version of the CMM is the result of the feedback from that workshop and ongoing feedback from the software community. The technical report that describes version 1.1. is summarised. >
1,179 citations
Authors
Showing all 134658 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Zhong Lin Wang | 245 | 2529 | 259003 |
Anil K. Jain | 183 | 1016 | 192151 |
Hyun-Chul Kim | 176 | 4076 | 183227 |
Rodney S. Ruoff | 164 | 666 | 194902 |
Tobin J. Marks | 159 | 1621 | 111604 |
Jean M. J. Fréchet | 154 | 726 | 90295 |
Albert-László Barabási | 152 | 438 | 200119 |
György Buzsáki | 150 | 446 | 96433 |
Stanislas Dehaene | 149 | 456 | 86539 |
Philip S. Yu | 148 | 1914 | 107374 |
James M. Tour | 143 | 859 | 91364 |
Thomas P. Russell | 141 | 1012 | 80055 |
Naomi J. Halas | 140 | 435 | 82040 |
Steven G. Louie | 137 | 777 | 88794 |
Daphne Koller | 135 | 367 | 71073 |