Institution
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Education•New York, New York, United States•
About: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai is a education organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 37488 authors who have published 76057 publications receiving 3704104 citations. The organization is also known as: Mount Sinai School of Medicine.
Topics: Population, Cancer, Transplantation, Virus, Health care
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Patients treated with dupilumab had marked and rapid improvement in all the evaluated measures of atopic dermatitis disease activity, and side-effect profiles were not dose-limiting.
Abstract: BACKGROUND Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, has shown efficacy in patients with asthma and elevated eosinophil levels. The blockade by dupilumab of these key drivers of type 2 helper T-cell (Th2)–mediated inflammation could help in the treatment of related diseases, including atopic dermatitis. METHODS We performed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving adults who had moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis despite treatment with topical glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors. Dupilumab was evaluated as monotherapy in two 4-week trials and in one 12-week trial and in combination with topical glucocorticoids in another 4-week study. End points included the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, the investigator’s global assessment score, pruritus, safety assessments, serum biomarker levels, and disease transcriptome. RESULTS In the 4-week monotherapy studies, dupilumab resulted in rapid and dose-dependent improvements in clinical indexes, biomarker levels, and the transcriptome. The results of the 12-week study of dupilumab monotherapy reproduced and extended the 4-week findings: 85% of patients in the dupilumab group, as compared with 35% of those in the placebo group, had a 50% reduction in the EASI score (EASI-50, with higher scores in the EASI indicating greater severity of eczema) (P<0.001); 40% of patients in the dupilumab group, as compared with 7% in the placebo group, had a score of 0 to 1 (indicating clearing or near-clearing of skin lesions) on the investigator’s global assessment (P<0.001); and pruritus scores decreased (indicating a reduction in itch) by 55.7% in the dupilumab group versus 15.1% in the placebo group (P<0.001). In the combination study, 100% of the patients in the dupilumab group, as compared with 50% of those who received topical glucocorticoids with placebo injection, met the criterion for EASI-50 (P = 0.002), despite the fact that patients who received dupilumab plus glucocorticoids used less than half the amount of topical glucocorticoids used by those who received placebo plus the topical medication (P = 0.16). Adverse events, such as skin infection, occurred more frequently with placebo; nasopharyngitis and headache were the most frequent adverse events with dupilumab. CONCLUSIONS Patients treated with dupilumab had marked and rapid improvement in all the evaluated measures of atopic dermatitis disease activity. Side-effect profiles were not doselimiting. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01259323, NCT01385657, NCT01639040, and NCT01548404.)
1,096 citations
••
Paris Descartes University1, Cornell University2, University of Massachusetts Medical School3, Spanish National Research Council4, University of Rome Tor Vergata5, Boston Children's Hospital6, University of Pittsburgh7, National Scientific and Technical Research Council8, National University of Cuyo9, Albert Einstein College of Medicine10, University of California, San Francisco11, University of New Mexico12, Goethe University Frankfurt13, University of Split14, University of Helsinki15, University of Salento16, German Cancer Research Center17, Virginia Commonwealth University18, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital19, Discovery Institute20, Harvard University21, University of Tromsø22, Hungarian Academy of Sciences23, Eötvös Loránd University24, New York University25, University of Vienna26, Babraham Institute27, University of South Australia28, Howard Hughes Medical Institute29, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center30, University of Oviedo31, University of Graz32, National Institutes of Health33, City University of New York34, Queens College35, University of Tokyo36, University of Zurich37, Novartis38, Austrian Academy of Sciences39, University of Groningen40, University of Cambridge41, University of Padua42, University of Oxford43, University of Bern44, University of Oslo45, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas46, University of Crete47, Francis Crick Institute48, Osaka University49, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai50
TL;DR: A panel of leading experts in the field attempts here to define several autophagy‐related terms based on specific biochemical features to formulate recommendations that facilitate the dissemination of knowledge within and outside the field of autophagic research.
Abstract: Over the past two decades, the molecular machinery that underlies autophagic responses has been characterized with ever increasing precision in multiple model organisms. Moreover, it has become clear that autophagy and autophagy-related processes have profound implications for human pathophysiology. However, considerable confusion persists about the use of appropriate terms to indicate specific types of autophagy and some components of the autophagy machinery, which may have detrimental effects on the expansion of the field. Driven by the overt recognition of such a potential obstacle, a panel of leading experts in the field attempts here to define several autophagy-related terms based on specific biochemical features. The ultimate objective of this collaborative exchange is to formulate recommendations that facilitate the dissemination of knowledge within and outside the field of autophagy research.
1,095 citations
••
TL;DR: Genome-wide analysis identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder, allowing for comparisons of shared genes and pathways with other psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia and depression.
Abstract: Bipolar disorder is a highly heritable psychiatric disorder. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) including 20,352 cases and 31,358 controls of European descent, with follow-up analysis of 822 variants with P < 1 × 10-4 in an additional 9,412 cases and 137,760 controls. Eight of the 19 variants that were genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10-8) in the discovery GWAS were not genome-wide significant in the combined analysis, consistent with small effect sizes and limited power but also with genetic heterogeneity. In the combined analysis, 30 loci were genome-wide significant, including 20 newly identified loci. The significant loci contain genes encoding ion channels, neurotransmitter transporters and synaptic components. Pathway analysis revealed nine significantly enriched gene sets, including regulation of insulin secretion and endocannabinoid signaling. Bipolar I disorder is strongly genetically correlated with schizophrenia, driven by psychosis, whereas bipolar II disorder is more strongly correlated with major depressive disorder. These findings address key clinical questions and provide potential biological mechanisms for bipolar disorder.
1,090 citations
••
TL;DR: The Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD) as mentioned in this paper is an object database that integrates a wealth of information relevant to the function of human proteins in health and disease, including protein-protein interactions, posttranslational modifications, enzyme/substrate relationships, disease associations, tissue expression, and subcellular localization.
Abstract: Human Protein Reference Database (HPRD) is an object database that integrates a wealth of information relevant to the function of human proteins in health and disease. Data pertaining to thousands of protein-protein interactions, posttranslational modifications, enzyme/substrate relationships, disease associations, tissue expression, and subcellular localization were extracted from the literature for a nonredundant set of 2750 human proteins. Almost all the information was obtained manually by biologists who read and interpreted >300,000 published articles during the annotation process. This database, which has an intuitive query interface allowing easy access to all the features of proteins, was built by using open source technologies and will be freely available at http://www.hprd.org to the academic community. This unified bioinformatics platform will be useful in cataloging and mining the large number of proteomic interactions and alterations that will be discovered in the postgenomic era.
1,088 citations
••
Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson1, Jian Yang2, Hilary K. Finucane3, Alexander Gusev4 +391 more•Institutions (14)
TL;DR: LDpred is introduced, a method that infers the posterior mean effect size of each marker by using a prior on effect sizes and LD information from an external reference panel, and outperforms the approach of pruning followed by thresholding, particularly at large sample sizes.
Abstract: Polygenic risk scores have shown great promise in predicting complex disease risk and will become more accurate as training sample sizes increase. The standard approach for calculating risk scores involves linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based marker pruning and applying a p value threshold to association statistics, but this discards information and can reduce predictive accuracy. We introduce LDpred, a method that infers the posterior mean effect size of each marker by using a prior on effect sizes and LD information from an external reference panel. Theory and simulations show that LDpred outperforms the approach of pruning followed by thresholding, particularly at large sample sizes. Accordingly, predicted R(2) increased from 20.1% to 25.3% in a large schizophrenia dataset and from 9.8% to 12.0% in a large multiple sclerosis dataset. A similar relative improvement in accuracy was observed for three additional large disease datasets and for non-European schizophrenia samples. The advantage of LDpred over existing methods will grow as sample sizes increase.
1,088 citations
Authors
Showing all 37948 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Robert Langer | 281 | 2324 | 326306 |
Shizuo Akira | 261 | 1308 | 320561 |
Gordon H. Guyatt | 231 | 1620 | 228631 |
Eugene Braunwald | 230 | 1711 | 264576 |
Bruce S. McEwen | 215 | 1163 | 200638 |
Robert J. Lefkowitz | 214 | 860 | 147995 |
Peter Libby | 211 | 932 | 182724 |
Mark J. Daly | 204 | 763 | 304452 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Paul G. Richardson | 183 | 1533 | 155912 |
Alan C. Evans | 183 | 866 | 134642 |
John C. Morris | 183 | 1441 | 168413 |
Paul M. Thompson | 183 | 2271 | 146736 |
Tadamitsu Kishimoto | 181 | 1067 | 130860 |
Bruce M. Psaty | 181 | 1205 | 138244 |