scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

IE University

EducationSegovia, Castilla y León, Spain
About: IE University is a education organization based out in Segovia, Castilla y León, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Corporate governance & Supply chain. The organization has 527 authors who have published 1709 publications receiving 64682 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a typology is introduced to help categorize various collaborative efforts within a research joint venture environment, based on two dimensions the locus of the knowledge and the knowledge management approach.
Abstract: As innovation and technology management grow in complexity the need for inter-organizational cooperation increases. Part of this cooperation requires the understanding of how knowledge management and learning processes may function to support a successful research and development collaboration. To further this understanding we introduce a typology to help categorize various collaborative efforts within a research joint venture environment. The typology is based on two dimensions the locus of the research joint venture knowledge and the knowledge management approach. Using a broad-based European database 98 research joint venture projects were used to evaluate the typology. We test two hypotheses related to these relationships. Implications for research and management of these types of projects are also introduced throughout the paper.

7 citations

DOI
Antonio Aloisi1
21 Dec 2020
TL;DR: In this article, a courier working for a shipping company filed a claim before a UK employment tribunal demanding reclassification as a worker with access to the national legislation implementing Directive 2003/88/EC on working time.
Abstract: This commentary examines case C-692/19, an order in response to a request for a preliminary ruling regarding the scope of application of working time protection, handed down by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in April 2020. A courier working for a shipping company filed a claim before a UK employment tribunal demanding reclassification as a ‘worker’ with access to the national legislation implementing Directive 2003/88/EC on working time. The tribunal decided to refer the question to the CJEU. At first glance, some elements of the order may give us the impression that EU working time protection does not cover workers who may find themselves in a situation of (bogus) self-employment, including those in the platform economy. However, this is not the case. The order is based on a specific set of facts that are in line with the CJEU’s established jurisprudential practices on the concept of worker, according to which workers formally classified as self-employed under the contract or the national law are excluded from the scope of the Working Time Directive only if they enjoy genuine, not nominal organisational autonomy. This analysis is organised as follows. After some introductory remarks, part 2 summarises the arguments of the remitting court and reviews the business model of the delivery company. Part 3 critically discusses some passages of the order. It also examines the notion of ‘worker’ as shaped by the CJEU, highlights strengths and shortcomings of this interpretive attitude, and summarises the proposals to overcome the weaknesses of an under-inclusive and potentially ineffective application of EU law. After appraising the widespread practices in the platform economy and the most recent regulatory developments, part 4 demystifies the issue of organisational flexibility, which is often understood in a unidirectional way, to the advantage of business. This analysis concludes by advocating for a purposive adaption of existing legal categories, beyond the formalistic approach adopted by the referring court in this case.

7 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Investigating various uses of PMSs among hospital managers and their effects on hospital outcomes, including process quality, degree of patient-oriented care, operational performance, and work culture finds that the way in whichPMSs are used is associated with hospital outcomes.
Abstract: Background: Inspired by the new public management movement, many public sector organizations have implemented business-like performance measurement systems (PMSs) in an effort to improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness. However, a large stream of the accounting literature has remained critical of the use of performance measures in the public sector because of the inherent difficulty in measuring output and the potential adverse effects of performance measurement. Although we acknowledge that PMSs may indeed sometimes yield adverse effects, we highlight in this study that the effects of PMSs depend on the way in which they are used. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate various uses of PMSs among hospital managers and their effects on hospital outcomes, including process quality, degree of patient-oriented care, operational performance, and work culture. Methodology: We use a survey sent to 432 Dutch hospital managers (19.2% response rate, 83 usable responses). For our main variables, we rely on previously validated constructs where possible, and we conduct ordinary least squares regressions to explore the relation between PMS use and hospital outcomes. Results: We find that the way in which PMSs are used is associated with hospital outcomes. An exploratory use of PMS has a positive association with patient-oriented care and collective work culture. Furthermore, the operational use of PMSs is positively related to operational performance but negatively related to patient-oriented care. There is no single best PMS use that positively affects all performance dimensions. Practice Implications: The way in which managers use PMSs is related to hospital outcomes. Therefore, hospital managers should critically reflect on how they use PMSs and whether their type of use is in line with the desired hospital outcomes.

7 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors studied the extent to which the scale-of-operations effect, linking spans of control and earnings inequality, is responsible for increases in inequality among lawyers.
Abstract: Earnings inequality has increased substantially since the 1970s. Using evidence from confidential Census data on U.S. law offices on lawyers’ organization and earnings, we study the extent to which the mechanism suggested by Lucas (1978) and Rosen (1982), a scale of operations effect linking spans of control and earnings inequality, is responsible for increases in inequality. We first show that earnings inequality among lawyers increased substantially between 1977 and 1992, and that the distribution of partner-associate ratios across offices changed in ways consistent with the hypothesis that coordination costs fell during this period. We then propose a 'hierarchical production function' in which output is the product of skill and time and estimate its parameters, applying insights from the equilibrium assignment literature. We find that coordination costs fell broadly and steadily during this period, so that hiring one’s first associate leveraged a partner’s skill by about 30% more in 1992 than 1977. We find also that changes in lawyers’ hierarchical organization account for about 2/3 of the increase in earnings inequality among lawyers in the upper tail, but a much smaller share of the increase in inequality between lawyers in the upper tail and other lawyers. These findings indicate that new organizational efficiencies potentially explain increases in inequality, especially among individuals toward the top of the earnings distribution.

6 citations


Authors

Showing all 569 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Andreas Richter11076948262
Martin J. Conyon4913110026
Mahmoud Ezzamel491387116
Mauro F. Guillén4514811899
Kazuhisa Bessho432235490
Bryan W. Husted401047369
Luis Garicano401197446
Marc Goergen382095677
Diego Miranda-Saavedra38597559
Cipriano Forza37846426
Dimo Dimov331176158
Gordon Murray32905604
Pascual Berrone29647732
Albert Maydeu-Olivares27373470
Jelena Zikic26462398
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Copenhagen Business School
9.6K papers, 341.8K citations

90% related

Stockholm School of Economics
4.8K papers, 285.5K citations

89% related

Bocconi University
8.9K papers, 344.1K citations

87% related

INSEAD
4.8K papers, 369.4K citations

87% related

London Business School
5.1K papers, 437.9K citations

86% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202313
202246
2021124
2020142
2019103
201891