Institution
Indiana University
Education•Bloomington, Indiana, United States•
About: Indiana University is a education organization based out in Bloomington, Indiana, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 64480 authors who have published 150058 publications receiving 6392902 citations. The organization is also known as: Indiana University system & indiana.edu.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Health care, Transplantation, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Echocardiography combined with dobutamine infusion is a safe and accurate method for detecting coronary artery disease and for predicting the extent of disease in those who have localized rest wall motion abnormalities.
Abstract: BACKGROUNDTwo-dimensional echocardiography performed during dobutamine infusion has been proposed as a potentially useful method for detecting coronary artery disease. However, the safety and diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography has not been established.METHODS AND RESULTSIn this study, echocardiograms were recorded during step-wise infusion of dobutamine to a maximum dose of 30 micrograms/kg/min in 103 patients who also underwent quantitative coronary angiography. The echocardiograms were digitally stored and displayed in a format that allowed simultaneous analysis of rest and stress images. Development of a new abnormality in regional function was used as an early end point for the dobutamine infusion. No patient had a symptomatic arrhythmia or complications from stress-induced ischemia. Significant coronary artery disease (greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis) was present in 35 of 55 patients who had normal echocardiograms at rest. The sensitivity and specificity of dobutami...
700 citations
•
[...]
699 citations
••
TL;DR: An introduction to the endocannabinoid system is provided with an emphasis on its role in synaptic plasticity and how the ECS is perturbed in schizophrenia.
698 citations
••
[...]
TL;DR: This review provides a brief description of the function, history, and scope of peer review, and characterizes and examines the empirical, methodological, and normative claims of bias in peer review research; and assesses possible alternatives to the status quo.
Abstract: Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by which knowledge communities vet and self-regulate their work. Despite vocal concerns, a closer look at the empirical and methodological limitations of research on bias raises questions about the existence and extent of many hypothesized forms of bias. In addition, the notion of bias is predicated on an implicit ideal that, once articulated, raises questions about the normative implications of research on bias in peer review. This review provides a brief description of the function, history, and scope of peer review; articulates and critiques the conception of bias unifying research on bias in peer review; characterizes and examines the empirical, methodological, and normative claims of bias in peer review research; and assesses possible alternatives to the status quo. We close by identifying ways to expand conceptions and studies of bias to contend with the complexity of social interactions among actors involved directly and indirectly in peer review. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
697 citations
••
TL;DR: This work expands and integrates qualitative conceptual models of plant niche and feedback to explore implications of microbial interactions for understanding plant community ecology and applies this model to understanding plant coexistence, monodominance and invasion ecology.
Abstract: Predominant frameworks for understanding plant ecology have an aboveground bias that neglects soil micro-organisms. This is inconsistent with recent work illustrating the importance of soil microbes in terrestrial ecology. Microbial effects have been incorporated into plant community dynamics using ideas of niche modification and plant–soil community feedbacks. Here, we expand and integrate qualitative conceptual models of plant niche and feedback to explore implications of microbial interactions for understanding plant community ecology. At the same time we review the empirical evidence for these processes. We also consider common mycorrhizal networks, and propose that these are best interpreted within the feedback framework. Finally, we apply our integrated model of niche and feedback to understanding plant coexistence, monodominance and invasion ecology.
697 citations
Authors
Showing all 64884 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Frank B. Hu | 250 | 1675 | 253464 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Bruce M. Spiegelman | 179 | 434 | 158009 |
David R. Williams | 178 | 2034 | 138789 |
D. M. Strom | 176 | 3167 | 194314 |
Markus Antonietti | 176 | 1068 | 127235 |
Lei Jiang | 170 | 2244 | 135205 |
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx | 170 | 1139 | 119082 |
Nahum Sonenberg | 167 | 647 | 104053 |
Carl W. Cotman | 165 | 809 | 105323 |
Yang Yang | 164 | 2704 | 144071 |
Jaakko Kaprio | 163 | 1532 | 126320 |
Ralph A. DeFronzo | 160 | 759 | 132993 |
Gavin Davies | 159 | 2036 | 149835 |
Tyler Jacks | 158 | 463 | 115172 |