scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Indiana University

EducationBloomington, Indiana, United States
About: Indiana University is a education organization based out in Bloomington, Indiana, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 64480 authors who have published 150058 publications receiving 6392902 citations. The organization is also known as: Indiana University system & indiana.edu.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in clinically equivalent efficacy outcomes, but with significantly fewer side effects compared with docetaxel in the second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and should be considered a standard treatment option for second-liners when available.
Abstract: Purpose To compare the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with advanced non—small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had a performance status 0 to 2, previous treatment with one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced NSCLC, and adequate organ function. Patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1 with vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 IV day 1 with dexamethasone every 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Five hundred seventy-one patients were randomly assigned. Overall response rates were 9.1% and 8.8% (analysis of variance P = .105) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months for each arm, and median survival time was 8.3 versus 7.9 months (P = not significant) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. The 1-year survival rate for each arm was 29.7%. Patients receiving docetaxel were mo...

2,366 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Mingxun Wang1, Jeremy Carver1, Vanessa V. Phelan2, Laura M. Sanchez2, Neha Garg2, Yao Peng1, Don D. Nguyen1, Jeramie D. Watrous2, Clifford A. Kapono1, Tal Luzzatto-Knaan2, Carla Porto2, Amina Bouslimani2, Alexey V. Melnik2, Michael J. Meehan2, Wei-Ting Liu3, Max Crüsemann4, Paul D. Boudreau4, Eduardo Esquenazi, Mario Sandoval-Calderón5, Roland D. Kersten6, Laura A. Pace2, Robert A. Quinn7, Katherine R. Duncan8, Cheng-Chih Hsu1, Dimitrios J. Floros1, Ronnie G. Gavilan, Karin Kleigrewe4, Trent R. Northen9, Rachel J. Dutton10, Delphine Parrot11, Erin E. Carlson12, Bertrand Aigle13, Charlotte Frydenlund Michelsen14, Lars Jelsbak14, Christian Sohlenkamp5, Pavel A. Pevzner1, Anna Edlund15, Anna Edlund16, Jeffrey S. McLean16, Jeffrey S. McLean17, Jörn Piel18, Brian T. Murphy19, Lena Gerwick4, Chih-Chuang Liaw20, Yu-Liang Yang21, Hans-Ulrich Humpf22, Maria Maansson14, Robert A. Keyzers23, Amy C. Sims24, Andrew R. Johnson25, Ashley M. Sidebottom25, Brian E. Sedio26, Andreas Klitgaard14, Charles B. Larson4, Charles B. Larson2, Cristopher A. Boya P., Daniel Torres-Mendoza, David Gonzalez2, Denise Brentan Silva27, Denise Brentan Silva28, Lucas Miranda Marques28, Daniel P. Demarque28, Egle Pociute, Ellis C. O’Neill4, Enora Briand4, Enora Briand11, Eric J. N. Helfrich18, Eve A. Granatosky29, Evgenia Glukhov4, Florian Ryffel18, Hailey Houson, Hosein Mohimani1, Jenan J. Kharbush4, Yi Zeng1, Julia A. Vorholt18, Kenji L. Kurita30, Pep Charusanti1, Kerry L. McPhail31, Kristian Fog Nielsen14, Lisa Vuong, Maryam Elfeki19, Matthew F. Traxler32, Niclas Engene33, Nobuhiro Koyama2, Oliver B. Vining31, Ralph S. Baric24, Ricardo Pianta Rodrigues da Silva28, Samantha J. Mascuch4, Sophie Tomasi11, Stefan Jenkins9, Venkat R. Macherla, Thomas Hoffman, Vinayak Agarwal4, Philip G. Williams34, Jingqui Dai34, Ram P. Neupane34, Joshua R. Gurr34, Andrés M. C. Rodríguez28, Anne Lamsa1, Chen Zhang1, Kathleen Dorrestein2, Brendan M. Duggan2, Jehad Almaliti2, Pierre-Marie Allard35, Prasad Phapale, Louis-Félix Nothias36, Theodore Alexandrov, Marc Litaudon36, Jean-Luc Wolfender35, Jennifer E. Kyle37, Thomas O. Metz37, Tyler Peryea38, Dac-Trung Nguyen38, Danielle VanLeer38, Paul Shinn38, Ajit Jadhav38, Rolf Müller, Katrina M. Waters37, Wenyuan Shi16, Xueting Liu39, Lixin Zhang39, Rob Knight1, Paul R. Jensen4, Bernhard O. Palsson1, Kit Pogliano1, Roger G. Linington30, Marcelino Gutiérrez, Norberto Peporine Lopes28, William H. Gerwick2, William H. Gerwick4, Bradley S. Moore4, Bradley S. Moore2, Pieter C. Dorrestein2, Pieter C. Dorrestein4, Nuno Bandeira1, Nuno Bandeira2 
TL;DR: In GNPS, crowdsourced curation of freely available community-wide reference MS libraries will underpin improved annotations and data-driven social-networking should facilitate identification of spectra and foster collaborations.
Abstract: The potential of the diverse chemistries present in natural products (NP) for biotechnology and medicine remains untapped because NP databases are not searchable with raw data and the NP community has no way to share data other than in published papers. Although mass spectrometry (MS) techniques are well-suited to high-throughput characterization of NP, there is a pressing need for an infrastructure to enable sharing and curation of data. We present Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking (GNPS; http://gnps.ucsd.edu), an open-access knowledge base for community-wide organization and sharing of raw, processed or identified tandem mass (MS/MS) spectrometry data. In GNPS, crowdsourced curation of freely available community-wide reference MS libraries will underpin improved annotations. Data-driven social-networking should facilitate identification of spectra and foster collaborations. We also introduce the concept of 'living data' through continuous reanalysis of deposited data.

2,365 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors provide a more complete conceptual model of entrepreneurial action that allows for examining entrepreneurial action at the individual level of analysis while remaining consistent with a rich legacy of system-level theories of the entrepreneur.
Abstract: By considering the amount of uncertainty perceived and the willingness to bear uncertainty concomitantly, we provide a more complete conceptual model of entrepreneurial action that allows for examination of entrepreneurial action at the individual level of analysis while remaining consistent with a rich legacy of system-level theories of the entrepreneur. Our model not only exposes limitations of existing theories of entrepreneurial action but also contributes to a deeper understanding of important conceptual issues, such as the nature of opportunity and the potential for philosophical reconciliation among entrepreneurship scholars.

2,347 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors present fascinating history and insights into the development of various classification systems and identify issues that arise during the creation of any classification system, such as the need to compromise between providing granular classifications that satisfy needs specific to a time and place.
Abstract: Bowker GC and Star SL. 389 pages. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Pr; 1999. $29.95. ISBN 0262024616. Order phone 800-356-0343. Field of medicine: Public health and medical informatics. Format: Hardcover book (softcover also available). Audience: Physicians and nonphysicians involved in developing or setting policy for classification systems, nomenclatures, or vocabularies. Purpose: To discuss the idea that classifications and standardizations have direct impact on social and political aspects of human interaction. Content: The authors organize their presentation into an introductory chapter that frames the issues, followed by three sections (classification and large-scale infrastructures, classification and biography, and classification and work practice) providing specific examples, and a conclusion section. The authors use the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, race classification under apartheid in South Africa, and the Nursing Intervention Classification as primary examples. An extensive bibliography of more than 300 references, a name index, and a subject index follow the text. Highlights: The authors present fascinating history and insights into the development of various classification systems. In addition, they identify issues that arise during the creation of any classification system, such as the need to compromise between providing granular classifications that satisfy needs specific to a time and place. Finally, the authors draw attention to the implications of choices made in the development of some important classification systems. These implications bear on moral judgments, financial effects, and political gains or losses. Limitations: The authors' writing style hinder the reader's ability to access the interesting information and to understand the implications of choices made in developing classification systems. While the overall organization of the book is clear, the themes and ideas do not flow well. Sentences require repeated readings, and a dictionary at your side would be helpful, given the authors' frequent use of unfamiliar words. These failings obscure interesting and valuable facts and viewpoints. Related readings: Svenonius'The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization (MIT Pr; 2000) and Aitchison and colleagues'Thesaurus Construction and Use: A Practical Manual (Fitzroy Dearborn; 2000). Reviewers: J. Marc Overhage, MD, PhD, and Jeffery G. Suico, MD, Regenstrief Institute for Health Care and Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.

2,314 citations


Authors

Showing all 64884 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
Stuart H. Orkin186715112182
Bruce M. Spiegelman179434158009
David R. Williams1782034138789
D. M. Strom1763167194314
Markus Antonietti1761068127235
Lei Jiang1702244135205
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx1701139119082
Nahum Sonenberg167647104053
Carl W. Cotman165809105323
Yang Yang1642704144071
Jaakko Kaprio1631532126320
Ralph A. DeFronzo160759132993
Gavin Davies1592036149835
Tyler Jacks158463115172
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

95% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

94% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

94% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

94% related

University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023127
2022694
20217,272
20207,310
20196,943
20186,496