scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Indiana University

EducationBloomington, Indiana, United States
About: Indiana University is a education organization based out in Bloomington, Indiana, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 64480 authors who have published 150058 publications receiving 6392902 citations. The organization is also known as: Indiana University system & indiana.edu.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a unified quantitative approach to modeling subjects' identification and categorization of multidimensional perceptual stimuli is proposed and tested, where subjects identify and categorize the same set of perceptually confusable stimuli varying on separable dimensions.
Abstract: A unified quantitative approach to modeling subjects' identification and categorization of multidimensional perceptual stimuli is proposed and tested. Two subjects identified and categorized the same set of perceptually confusable stimuli varying on separable dimensions. The identification data were modeled using Sbepard's (1957) multidimensional scaling-choice framework. This framework was then extended to model the subjects' categorization performance. The categorization model, which generalizes the context theory of classification developed by Medin and Schaffer (1978), assumes that subjects store category exemplars in memory. Classification decisions are based on the similarity of stimuli to the stored exemplars. It is assumed that the same multidimensional perceptual representation underlies performance in both the identification and Categorization paradigms. However, because of the influence of selective attention, similarity relationships change systematically across the two paradigrns. Some support was gained for the hypothesis that subjects distribute attention among component dimensions so as to optimize categorization performance. Evidence was also obtained that subjects may have augmented their category representations with inferred exemplars. Implications of the results for theories of multidimensional scaling and categorization are discussed. In their 1956 classic, A Study of Thinking, Bruner, Goodnow, and Austin marveled at the capacity of people to discriminate stimuli and to identify them as unique items. At the same time they stressed the importance of categorization, the process by which discriminably different things are classified into groups and are thereby rendered equivalent. In one sense the processes of identification and categorization seem diametrically opposed, the former dealing with the particular and the latter with the general. Yet similar principles may underlie subjects' identification and categorization of multidimensional stimuli, and performance in these tasks may be highly related. Indeed, the present research renews the issue explored previously by Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) and Shepard and Chang (1963)namely, Do the principles of stimulus generalization underlying identification performance also underlie categorization performance? Furthermore, given knowledge of performance in an identification paradigm, can one predict performance in a categorization paradigm using the same set of stimuli?

2,148 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors investigated the effects of word-of-mouth (WOM) communications and specific attribute information on product evaluations and found that a face-to-face WOM communication was more persuasive than a printed format.
Abstract: The effects of word-of-mouth (WOM) communications and specific attribute information on product evaluations were investigated. A face-to-face WOM communication was more persuasive than a printed format (experiment 1). Although a strong WOM effect was found, this effect was reduced or eliminated when a prior impression of the target brand was available from memory or when extremely negative attribute information was presented (experiment 2). The results suggest that diverse, seemingly unrelated judgmental phenomena—such as the vividness effect, the perseverance effect, and the negativity effect—can be explained through the accessibility-diagnosticity model.

2,145 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Three studies are described in which measures of perceived social support from friends and from family were developed and validated and the PSS measures were internally consistent and appeared to measure valid constructs that were separate from each other and from network measures.
Abstract: Three studies are described in which measures of perceived social support from friends (PSS-Fr) and from family (PSS-Fa) were developed and validated. The PSS measures were internally consistent and appeared to measure valid constructs that were separate from each other and from network measures. PSS-Fr and PSS-Fa were both inversely related to symptoms of distress and psychopathology but the relationship was stronger for PSS-Fa. PSS-Fr was more closely related to social competence. PSS-Fa was unaffected by either positive or negative mood states (self-statements), but the reporting of PSS-Fr was lowered by negative mood states. High PSS-Fr subjects were significantly lower in trait anxiety and talked about themselves more to friends and sibs than low PSS-Fr subjects. Low PSS-Fa subjects showed marked verbal inhibition with sibs.

2,141 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Seth Carbon1, Eric Douglass1, Nathan Dunn1, Benjamin M. Good1  +189 moreInstitutions (19)
TL;DR: GO-CAM, a new framework for representing gene function that is more expressive than standard GO annotations, has been released, and users can now explore the growing repository of these models.
Abstract: The Gene Ontology resource (GO; http://geneontology.org) provides structured, computable knowledge regarding the functions of genes and gene products. Founded in 1998, GO has become widely adopted in the life sciences, and its contents are under continual improvement, both in quantity and in quality. Here, we report the major developments of the GO resource during the past two years. Each monthly release of the GO resource is now packaged and given a unique identifier (DOI), enabling GO-based analyses on a specific release to be reproduced in the future. The molecular function ontology has been refactored to better represent the overall activities of gene products, with a focus on transcription regulator activities. Quality assurance efforts have been ramped up to address potentially out-of-date or inaccurate annotations. New evidence codes for high-throughput experiments now enable users to filter out annotations obtained from these sources. GO-CAM, a new framework for representing gene function that is more expressive than standard GO annotations, has been released, and users can now explore the growing repository of these models. We also provide the ‘GO ribbon’ widget for visualizing GO annotations to a gene; the widget can be easily embedded in any web page.

2,138 citations

BookDOI
03 Jan 1989

2,132 citations


Authors

Showing all 64884 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Frank B. Hu2501675253464
Stuart H. Orkin186715112182
Bruce M. Spiegelman179434158009
David R. Williams1782034138789
D. M. Strom1763167194314
Markus Antonietti1761068127235
Lei Jiang1702244135205
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx1701139119082
Nahum Sonenberg167647104053
Carl W. Cotman165809105323
Yang Yang1642704144071
Jaakko Kaprio1631532126320
Ralph A. DeFronzo160759132993
Gavin Davies1592036149835
Tyler Jacks158463115172
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

95% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

94% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

94% related

Yale University
220.6K papers, 12.8M citations

94% related

University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023127
2022694
20217,272
20207,310
20196,943
20186,496