Institution
Indiana University
Education•Bloomington, Indiana, United States•
About: Indiana University is a education organization based out in Bloomington, Indiana, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 64480 authors who have published 150058 publications receiving 6392902 citations. The organization is also known as: Indiana University system & indiana.edu.
Topics: Population, Poison control, Health care, Transplantation, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the methodology, sampling, coding, interviewing, statistical analyses, and then examine factors and sources of sexual outlet, based upon histories of approximately 5,300 males which were collected during a fifteen year period.
Abstract: When published in 1948 this volume encountered a storm of condemnation and acclaim. It is, however, a milestone on the path toward a scientific approach to the understanding of human sexual behavior. Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey and his fellow researchers sought to accumulate an objective body of facts regarding sex. They employed first hand interviews to gather this data. This volume is based upon histories of approximately 5,300 males which were collected during a fifteen year period. This text describes the methodology, sampling, coding, interviewing, statistical analyses, and then examines factors and sources of sexual outlet.
1,172 citations
••
TL;DR: The possibility of spontaneous breakdown of Lorentz symmetry in string theory is explored via covariant string field theory and a potential mechanism is suggested that may be generic in many string theories.
Abstract: The possibility of spontaneous breakdown of Lorentz symmetry in string theory is explored via covariant string field theory. A potential mechanism is suggested for the Lorentz breaking that may be generic in many string theories.
1,172 citations
••
TL;DR: Hahn et al. as mentioned in this paper presented CAFE (Computational Analysis of gene Family Evolution), a tool for the statistical analysis of the evolution of the size of gene families.
Abstract: Summary: We present CAFE (Computational Analysis of gene Family Evolution), a tool for the statistical analysis of the evolution of the size of gene families. It uses a stochastic birth and death process to model the evolution of gene family sizes over a phylogeny. For a specified phylogenetic tree, and given the gene family sizes in the extant species, CAFE can estimate the global birth and death rate of gene families, infer the most likely gene family size at all internal nodes, identify gene families that have accelerated rates of gain and loss (quantified by a p-value) and identify which branches cause the p-value to be small for significant families.
Availability: Software is available from http://www.bio.indiana.edu/~hahnlab/Software.html
Contact: mwh@indiana.edu
1,170 citations
••
University College London1, University of Duisburg-Essen2, University of Edinburgh3, University of New South Wales4, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven5, Mount Vernon Hospital6, Royal Melbourne Hospital7, Sheba Medical Center8, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center9, Indiana University10, AstraZeneca11, Harvard University12
TL;DR: The hypothesis that patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer with a BRCA mutation have the greatest likelihood of benefiting from olaparib treatment is supported.
Abstract: Summary Background Maintenance monotherapy with the PARP inhibitor olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer. We aimed to explore the hypothesis that olaparib is most likely to benefit patients with a BRCA mutation. Methods We present data from the second interim analysis of overall survival and a retrospective, preplanned analysis of data by BRCA mutation status from our randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study that assessed maintenance treatment with olaparib 400 mg twice daily (capsules) versus placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer who had received two or more platinum-based regimens and who had a partial or complete response to their most recent platinum-based regimen. Randomisation was by an interactive voice response system, stratified by time to progression on penultimate platinum-based regimen, response to the most recent platinum-based regimen before randomisation, and ethnic descent. The primary endpoint was PFS, analysed for the overall population and by BRCA status. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00753545. Findings Between Aug 28, 2008, and Feb 9, 2010, 136 patients were assigned to olaparib and 129 to placebo. BRCA status was known for 131 (96%) patients in the olaparib group versus 123 (95%) in the placebo group, of whom 74 (56%) versus 62 (50%) had a deleterious or suspected deleterious germline or tumour BRCA mutation. Of patients with a BRCA mutation, median PFS was significantly longer in the olaparib group than in the placebo group (11·2 months [95% CI 8·3–not calculable] vs 4·3 months [3·0–5·4]; HR 0·18 [0·10–0·31]; p BRCA , although the difference between groups was lower (7·4 months [5·5–10·3] vs 5·5 months [3·7–5·6]; HR 0·54 [0·34–0·85]; p=0·0075). At the second interim analysis of overall survival (58% maturity), overall survival did not significantly differ between the groups (HR 0·88 [95% CI 0·64–1·21]; p=0·44); similar findings were noted for patients with mutated BRCA (HR 0·73 [0·45–1·17]; p=0·19) and wild-type BRCA (HR 0·99 [0·63–1·55]; p=0·96). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the olaparib group were fatigue (in ten [7%] patients in the olaparib group vs four [3%] in the placebo group) and anaemia (seven [5%] vs one [ BRCA and the overall population. Interpretation These results support the hypothesis that patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent serous ovarian cancer with a BRCA mutation have the greatest likelihood of benefiting from olaparib treatment. Funding AstraZeneca.
1,168 citations
••
TL;DR: Modifications to the Gleason grading system are incorporated into the 2016 WHO section on grading of prostate cancer, and it is recommended that the percentage of pattern 4 should be reported for Gleason score 7.
1,166 citations
Authors
Showing all 64884 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Frank B. Hu | 250 | 1675 | 253464 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Bruce M. Spiegelman | 179 | 434 | 158009 |
David R. Williams | 178 | 2034 | 138789 |
D. M. Strom | 176 | 3167 | 194314 |
Markus Antonietti | 176 | 1068 | 127235 |
Lei Jiang | 170 | 2244 | 135205 |
Brenda W.J.H. Penninx | 170 | 1139 | 119082 |
Nahum Sonenberg | 167 | 647 | 104053 |
Carl W. Cotman | 165 | 809 | 105323 |
Yang Yang | 164 | 2704 | 144071 |
Jaakko Kaprio | 163 | 1532 | 126320 |
Ralph A. DeFronzo | 160 | 759 | 132993 |
Gavin Davies | 159 | 2036 | 149835 |
Tyler Jacks | 158 | 463 | 115172 |