Institution
Institute for Systems Biology
Nonprofit•Seattle, Washington, United States•
About: Institute for Systems Biology is a nonprofit organization based out in Seattle, Washington, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Proteomics. The organization has 1277 authors who have published 2777 publications receiving 353165 citations.
Topics: Population, Proteomics, Proteome, Systems biology, Gene
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The SBW architecture, a selection of current modules, including Jarnac, JDesigner, and SBWMeta-tool, and the close integration of SBW into BioSPICE, which enables both frameworks to share tools and compliment and strengthen each others capabilities are described.
Abstract: Researchers in quantitative systems biology make use of a large number of different software packages for modelling, analysis, visualization, and general data manipulation. In this paper, we describe the Systems Biology Workbench (SBW), a software framework that allows heterogeneous application components--written in diverse programming languages and running on different platforms--to communicate and use each others' capabilities via a fast binary encoded-message system. Our goal was to create a simple, high performance, opensource software infrastructure which is easy to implement and understand. SBW enables applications (potentially running on separate, distributed computers) to communicate via a simple network protocol. The interfaces to the system are encapsulated in client-side libraries that we provide for different programming languages. We describe in this paper the SBW architecture, a selection of current modules, including Jarnac, JDesigner, and SBWMeta-tool, and the close integration of SBW into BioSPICE, which enables both frameworks to share tools and compliment and strengthen each others capabilities.
308 citations
••
University of California, Santa Cruz1, University of Florida2, Mississippi State University3, Pompeu Fabra University4, University of Texas at Arlington5, University of Colorado Denver6, University UCINF7, Austral University of Chile8, Genetic Information Research Institute9, Institute for Systems Biology10, University of Georgia11, University of Münster12, Uppsala University13, University of Sydney14, University of the Republic15, Occidental College16, University of Arizona17, Harvard University18, North Carolina State University19, Howard Hughes Medical Institute20, University of Copenhagen21, University of Tokyo22, University of Iowa23, University of Delaware24, University of California, Los Angeles25, Louisiana State University26, Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies27, Texas Tech University28
TL;DR: An exceptionally slow rate of genome evolution within crocodilians at all levels is observed, consistent with a single underlying cause of a reduced rate of evolutionary change rather than intrinsic differences in base repair machinery.
Abstract: ?? To provide context for the diversification of archosaurs—the group that includes crocodilians, dinosaurs, and birds—we generated draft genomes of three crocodilians: Alligator mississippiensis (the American alligator), Crocodylus porosus (the saltwater crocodile), and Gavialis gangeticus (the Indian gharial). We observed an exceptionally slow rate of genome evolution within crocodilians at all levels, including nucleotide substitutions, indels, transposable element content and movement, gene family evolution, and chromosomal synteny. When placed within the context of related taxa including birds and turtles, this suggests that the common ancestor of all of these taxa also exhibited slow genome evolution and that the comparatively rapid evolution is derived in birds. The data also provided the opportunity to analyze heterozygosity in crocodilians, which indicates a likely reduction in population size for all three taxa through the Pleistocene. Finally, these data combined with newly published bird genomes allowed us to reconstruct the partial genome of the common ancestor of archosaurs, thereby providing a tool to investigate the genetic starting material of crocodilians, birds, and dinosaurs.
306 citations
••
TL;DR: This study supports the claim that the high degree of connectivity within biological and EF networks will enable the construction of similar models for any organism from relatively modest numbers of experiments.
302 citations
••
Northern Arizona University1, National Institutes of Health2, University of Minnesota3, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution4, University of California, Davis5, Massachusetts Institute of Technology6, University of Copenhagen7, University of Trento8, Chinese Academy of Sciences9, University of California, San Francisco10, University of Pennsylvania11, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory12, North Carolina State University13, University of Montana14, Institute for Systems Biology15, Dalhousie University16, University of British Columbia17, Statens Serum Institut18, Anschutz Medical Campus19, University of Washington20, University of California, San Diego21, Michigan State University22, Stanford University23, Harvard University24, Broad Institute25, Australian National University26, University of Düsseldorf27, University of New South Wales28, Sookmyung Women's University29, San Diego State University30, Howard Hughes Medical Institute31, Max Planck Society32, Cornell University33, Colorado State University34, Google35, Syracuse University36, Webster University37, United States Department of Agriculture38, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences39, Colorado School of Mines40, University of Southern Mississippi41, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration42, University of California, Merced43, Wageningen University and Research Centre44, University of Arizona45, Environment Agency46, University of Florida47, Merck & Co.48
TL;DR: An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Abstract: In the version of this article initially published, some reference citations were incorrect. The three references to Jupyter Notebooks should have cited Kluyver et al. instead of Gonzalez et al. The reference to Qiita should have cited Gonzalez et al. instead of Schloss et al. The reference to mothur should have cited Schloss et al. instead of McMurdie & Holmes. The reference to phyloseq should have cited McMurdie & Holmes instead of Huber et al. The reference to Bioconductor should have cited Huber et al. instead of Franzosa et al. And the reference to the biobakery suite should have cited Franzosa et al. instead of Kluyver et al. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
301 citations
••
TL;DR: In comparing the physiologies of the two halophilic archaea, in addition to the expected extensive similarity, it is discovered several differences in their metabolic strategies and physiological responses such as distinct pathways for arginine breakdown in each halophile.
Abstract: We report the complete sequence of the 4,274,642-bp genome of Haloarcula marismortui, a halophilic archaeal isolate from the Dead Sea. The genome is organized into nine circular replicons of varying G+C compositions ranging from 54% to 62%. Comparison of the genome architectures of Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 and H. marismortui suggests a common ancestor for the two organisms and a genome of significantly reduced size in the former. Both of these halophilic archaea use the same strategy of high surface negative charge of folded proteins as means to circumvent the salting-out phenomenon in a hypersaline cytoplasm. A multitiered annotation approach, including primary sequence similarities, protein family signatures, structure prediction, and a protein function association network, has assigned putative functions for at least 58% of the 4242 predicted proteins, a far larger number than is usually achieved in most newly sequenced microorganisms. Among these assigned functions were genes encoding six opsins, 19 MCP and/or HAMP domain signal transducers, and an unusually large number of environmental response regulators-nearly five times as many as those encoded in Halobacterium sp. NRC-1--suggesting H. marismortui is significantly more physiologically capable of exploiting diverse environments. In comparing the physiologies of the two halophilic archaea, in addition to the expected extensive similarity, we discovered several differences in their metabolic strategies and physiological responses such as distinct pathways for arginine breakdown in each halophile. Finally, as expected from the larger genome, H. marismortui encodes many more functions and seems to have fewer nutritional requirements for survival than does Halobacterium sp. NRC-1.
300 citations
Authors
Showing all 1292 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Younan Xia | 216 | 943 | 175757 |
Ruedi Aebersold | 182 | 879 | 141881 |
David Haussler | 172 | 488 | 224960 |
Steven P. Gygi | 172 | 704 | 129173 |
Nahum Sonenberg | 167 | 647 | 104053 |
Leroy Hood | 158 | 853 | 128452 |
Mark H. Ellisman | 117 | 637 | 55289 |
Wei Zhang | 112 | 1189 | 93641 |
John Ralph | 109 | 442 | 39238 |
Eric H. Davidson | 106 | 454 | 47058 |
James R. Heath | 103 | 425 | 58548 |
Alan Aderem | 99 | 246 | 46682 |
Anne-Claude Gingras | 97 | 336 | 40714 |
Trey Ideker | 97 | 306 | 72276 |
Michael H. Gelb | 94 | 506 | 34714 |