scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology

FacilitySingapore, Singapore
About: Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology is a facility organization based out in Singapore, Singapore. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Zebrafish & Golgi apparatus. The organization has 1618 authors who have published 1940 publications receiving 121275 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is now becoming clear that p53 can have a much broader role and can contribute to the development, life expectancy and overall fitness of an organism.
Abstract: p53 is best known as a tumour suppressor, although recent studies have challenged the view that this is its only role. Instead, p53 has important functions in organismal development, and might contribute to a number of diseases other than cancer.

2,096 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel Conroy-Beam1, David M. Buss2, Kelly Asao2, Agnieszka Sorokowska3, Agnieszka Sorokowska4, Piotr Sorokowski3, Toivo Aavik5, Grace Akello6, Mohammad Madallh Alhabahba7, Charlotte Alm8, Naumana Amjad9, Afifa Anjum9, Chiemezie S. Atama10, Derya Atamtürk Duyar11, Richard Ayebare, Carlota Batres12, Mons Bendixen13, Aicha Bensafia14, Boris Bizumic15, Mahmoud Boussena14, Marina Butovskaya16, Marina Butovskaya17, Seda Can18, Katarzyna Cantarero19, Antonin Carrier20, Hakan Cetinkaya21, Ilona Croy4, Rosa María Cueto22, Marcin Czub3, Daria Dronova17, Seda Dural18, İzzet Duyar11, Berna Ertuğrul23, Agustín Espinosa22, Ignacio Estevan24, Carla Sofia Esteves25, Luxi Fang26, Tomasz Frackowiak3, Jorge Contreras Garduño27, Karina Ugalde González, Farida Guemaz, Petra Gyuris28, Mária Halamová29, Iskra Herak20, Marina Horvat30, Ivana Hromatko31, Chin Ming Hui26, Jas Laile Suzana Binti Jaafar32, Feng Jiang33, Konstantinos Kafetsios34, Tina Kavčič35, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair13, Nicolas Kervyn20, Truong Thi Khanh Ha19, Imran Ahmed Khilji36, Nils C. Köbis37, Hoang Moc Lan19, András Láng28, Georgina R. Lennard15, Ernesto León22, Torun Lindholm8, Trinh Thi Linh19, Giulia Lopez38, Nguyen Van Luot19, Alvaro Mailhos24, Zoi Manesi39, Rocio Martinez40, Sarah L. McKerchar15, Norbert Meskó28, Girishwar Misra41, Conal Monaghan15, Emanuel C. Mora42, Alba Moya-Garófano40, Bojan Musil30, Jean Carlos Natividade43, Agnieszka Niemczyk3, George Nizharadze, Elisabeth Oberzaucher44, Anna Oleszkiewicz3, Anna Oleszkiewicz4, Mohd Sofian Omar-Fauzee45, Ike E. Onyishi10, Barış Özener11, Ariela Francesca Pagani38, Vilmante Pakalniskiene46, Miriam Parise38, Farid Pazhoohi47, Annette Pisanski42, Katarzyna Pisanski3, Katarzyna Pisanski48, Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano, Camelia Popa49, Pavol Prokop50, Pavol Prokop51, Muhammad Rizwan, Mario Sainz52, Svjetlana Salkičević31, Ruta Sargautyte46, Ivan Sarmány-Schuller53, Susanne Schmehl44, Shivantika Sharad41, Razi Sultan Siddiqui54, Franco Simonetti55, Stanislava Stoyanova56, Meri Tadinac31, Marco Antonio Correa Varella57, Christin-Melanie Vauclair25, Luis Diego Vega, Dwi Ajeng Widarini, Gyesook Yoo58, Marta Zaťková29, Maja Zupančič59 
University of California, Santa Barbara1, University of Texas at Austin2, University of Wrocław3, Dresden University of Technology4, University of Tartu5, Gulu University6, Middle East University7, Stockholm University8, University of the Punjab9, University of Nigeria, Nsukka10, Istanbul University11, Franklin & Marshall College12, Norwegian University of Science and Technology13, University of Algiers14, Australian National University15, Russian State University for the Humanities16, Russian Academy of Sciences17, İzmir University of Economics18, University of Social Sciences and Humanities19, Université catholique de Louvain20, Ankara University21, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru22, Cumhuriyet University23, University of the Republic24, ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon25, The Chinese University of Hong Kong26, National Autonomous University of Mexico27, University of Pécs28, University of Constantine the Philosopher29, University of Maribor30, University of Zagreb31, University of Malaya32, Central University of Finance and Economics33, University of Crete34, University of Primorska35, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology36, University of Amsterdam37, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart38, VU University Amsterdam39, University of Granada40, University of Delhi41, University of Havana42, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro43, University of Vienna44, Universiti Utara Malaysia45, Vilnius University46, University of British Columbia47, University of Sussex48, Romanian Academy49, Comenius University in Bratislava50, Slovak Academy of Sciences51, University of Monterrey52, SAS Institute53, DHA Suffa University54, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile55, South-West University "Neofit Rilski"56, University of São Paulo57, Kyung Hee University58, University of Ljubljana59
TL;DR: This work combines this large cross-cultural sample with agent-based models to compare eight hypothesized models of human mating markets and finds that this cross-culturally universal pattern of mate choice is most consistent with a Euclidean model of mate preference integration.
Abstract: Humans express a wide array of ideal mate preferences. Around the world, people desire romantic partners who are intelligent, healthy, kind, physically attractive, wealthy, and more. In order for these ideal preferences to guide the choice of actual romantic partners, human mating psychology must possess a means to integrate information across these many preference dimensions into summaries of the overall mate value of their potential mates. Here we explore the computational design of this mate preference integration process using a large sample of n = 14,487 people from 45 countries around the world. We combine this large cross-cultural sample with agent-based models to compare eight hypothesized models of human mating markets. Across cultures, people higher in mate value appear to experience greater power of choice on the mating market in that they set higher ideal standards, better fulfill their preferences in choice, and pair with higher mate value partners. Furthermore, we find that this cross-culturally universal pattern of mate choice is most consistent with a Euclidean model of mate preference integration.

1,827 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
16 Nov 2007-Cell
TL;DR: It is shown that apoptosis caused by an IAC is blocked by the caspase 8 inhibitor crmA and that IAP antagonists activate NF-κB signaling via inhibtion of cIAP1.

1,009 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is highlighted that there are a variety of enzymes with different specificities, suggesting that individual nucleases act on distinct subpopulations of transcripts within the cell and multiple mechanisms by which mRNA degradation could be regulated.
Abstract: The degradation of eukaryotic mRNAs plays important roles in the modulation of gene expression, quality control of mRNA biogenesis and antiviral defenses. In the past five years, many of the enzymes involved in this process have been identified and mechanisms that modulate their activities have begun to be identified. In this review, we describe the enzymes of mRNA degradation and their properties. We highlight that there are a variety of enzymes with different specificities, suggesting that individual nucleases act on distinct subpopulations of transcripts within the cell. In several cases, translation factors that bind mRNA inhibit these nucleases. In addition, recent work has begun to identify distinct mRNP complexes that recruit the nucleases to transcripts through different mRNA-interacting proteins. These properties and complexes suggest multiple mechanisms by which mRNA degradation could be regulated.

835 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Using the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a mobile artificial exon carried by a transposable P-element, a protein trap system is developed in Drosophila and it is observed that the subcellular localization of the fusion protein corresponds to the described distribution of the endogenous protein.
Abstract: In Drosophila, enhancer trap strategies allow rapid access to expression patterns, molecular data, and mutations in trapped genes. However, they do not give any information at the protein level, e.g., about the protein subcellular localization. Using the green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a mobile artificial exon carried by a transposable P-element, we have developed a protein trap system. We screened for individual flies, in which GFP tags full-length endogenous proteins expressed from their endogenous locus, allowing us to observe their cellular and subcellular distribution. GFP fusions are targeted to virtually any compartment of the cell. In the case of insertions in previously known genes, we observe that the subcellular localization of the fusion protein corresponds to the described distribution of the endogenous protein. The artificial GFP exon does not disturb upstream and downstream splicing events. Many insertions correspond to genes not predicted by the Drosophila Genome Project. Our results show the feasibility of a protein trap in Drosophila. GFP reveals in real time the dynamics of protein's distribution in the whole, live organism and provides useful markers for a number of cellular structures and compartments.

784 citations


Authors

Showing all 1623 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Nancy A. Jenkins155741101587
Neal G. Copeland154726100130
Stephen R. Quake13258977778
David P. Lane12956890787
Andromachi Tsirou129132083661
Noemi Beni128103076201
Zoltan Szillasi128121484392
Axel Ullrich12443661445
Gary S. Stein11887056438
Yi Zhang11643673227
Jean Paul Thiery10640351843
Sanjay Gupta9990235039
Sydney Brenner9534054977
Peng Li95154845198
Jerrold M. Ward9546739726
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Scripps Research Institute
32.8K papers, 2.9M citations

81% related

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
34.6K papers, 5.2M citations

81% related

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
6.6K papers, 1M citations

81% related

Genentech
17.1K papers, 1.4M citations

80% related

European Bioinformatics Institute
10.5K papers, 999.6K citations

80% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20233
20225
202141
202054
201934
201856