Institution
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Nonprofit•Laxenburg, Austria•
About: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis is a nonprofit organization based out in Laxenburg, Austria. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Greenhouse gas. The organization has 1369 authors who have published 5075 publications receiving 280467 citations. The organization is also known as: IIASA.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, a general introduction to urn schemes, together with some new results, is presented, where the authors demonstrate the phenomena of multiple equilibria, different vonvergence rates for different limit patterns, locally positive and locally negative feedbacks, limit behavior associated with nonhomogeneity of economic environment where producers (firms) are operating.
Abstract: Adaptive (path dependent) processes of growth modeled by urn schemes are important for several fields of applications: biology, physics, chemistry, economics. In this paper we present a general introduction to urn schemes, together with some new results. We review the studies that have been done in the technological dynamics by means of such schemes. Also several other domains of economic dynamics are analysed by the same machinery and its new modifications allowing to tackle non-homogeneity of the phase space. We demonstrate the phenomena of multiple equilibria, different vonvergence rates for different limit patterns, locally positive and locally negative feedbacks, limit behavior associated with non-homogeneity of economic environment where producers (firms) are operating. It is also shown that the above urn processes represent a natural and convenient stochastic replicator dynamics which can be used in evolutionary games.
79 citations
••
TL;DR: This paper is intended to explore some of the algorithmic issues in LBD modeling for carbon dioxide abatement, and it should be possible for BARON or a similar approach to be extended to large-scale LBD models for climate change.
79 citations
••
TL;DR: Two major global health policy initiatives, the Global Fund against AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria and the bundling of long-standing international health goals in the form of Millennium Development Goals are examined, concluding that both initiatives are best interpreted in the context of traditional development assistance and have little to do with the challenge posed by GPGs for health.
Abstract: The 'global public good' (GPG) concept has gained increasing attention, in health as well as development circles. However, it has suffered in finding currency as a general tool for global resource mobilisation, and is at risk of being attached to almost anything promoting development. This overstretches and devalues the validity and usefulness of the concept. This paper first defines GPGs and describes the policy challenge that they pose. Second, it identifies two key areas, health R&D and communicable disease control, in which the GPG concept is clearly relevant and considers the extent to which it has been applied. We point out that that, while there have been many new initiatives, it is not clear that additional resources from non-traditional sources have been forthcoming. Yet achieving this is, in effect, the entire purpose of applying the GPG concept in global health. Moreover, the proliferation of disease-specific programs associated with GPG reasoning has tended to promote vertical interventions at the expense of more general health sector strengthening. Third, we examine two major global health policy initiatives, the Global Fund against AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) and the bundling of long-standing international health goals in the form of Millennium Development Goals (MDG), asking how the GPG perspective has contributed to defining objectives and strategies. We conclude that both initiatives are best interpreted in the context of traditional development assistance and, one-world rhetoric aside, have little to do with the challenge posed by GPGs for health. The paper concludes by considering how the GPG concept can be more effectively used to promote global health.
79 citations
••
TL;DR: First estimates of the potential direct impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on period life expectancy are provided, indicating that in regions with relatively high life expectancy, if the infection prevalence threshold exceeds 1 or 2%, the CO VID-19Pandemic will break the secular trend of increasing life expectancy; resulting in a decline in periodlife expectancy.
Abstract: Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant number of deaths worldwide. If the prevalence of the virus
infection continues to rise, it can potentially have an impact on life expectancy. This paper provides first
estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on period life expectancy.
Methods
From the estimates of bias-adjusted age-specific case fatality rates in Hubei (China) and a range of six
assumptions of prevalence rates ranging from 1% to 70%, we built a discrete-time microsimulation model
that simulates the number of infected by COVID-19, the number of dying from it and the number of dying
from all causes week by week for a period of one year. We applied our simulation to four broad regions:
North America and Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, South Eastern Asia, and Sub-Saharan African.
For each region, 100,000 individuals per each 5-year age group are simulated.
Results
At 10% prevalence rate, the loss in life expectancy at birth is likely above 1 year in North America and Europe
and in Latin America and the Caribbean. In South Eastern Asia and in Sub-Saharan Africa, one year lost in life
expectancy corresponds to a prevalence of infection of about 15% and 25%, respectively. Given the
uncertainty in fatality rates, with a prevalence of COVID-19 infections of 50% under 95% prediction intervals,
life expectancy would drop by 3 to 9 years in North America and Europe, by 3 to 8 years in Latin America and
the Caribbean, by 2 to 7 years in South Eastern Asia and by 1 to 4 in Sub-Saharan Africa. In all prevalence
scenarios, as long as the prevalence rate of COVID-19 infection remains below 1 or 2%, COVID-19 would not
affect life expectancy in a substantial manner.
Interpretation
In the regions with relatively high life expectancy, for a prevalence of infection threshold above 1 or 2%, the
COVID-19 pandemic will break the secular trend of increasing life expectancy resulting in a decline in period
life expectancy. With life expectancy being a key indicator of human development, mortality increase,
especially among the vulnerable subgroups of populations would set the country back on their path of human
development.
79 citations
••
University of Victoria1, Stockholm University2, Stockholm Resilience Centre3, University of Kansas4, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research5, Humboldt University of Berlin6, University of Tokyo7, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign8, Utrecht University9, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis10, University of Minnesota11, Ruhr University Bochum12, McGill University13, Colorado State University14, Aalto University15, University of Bristol16, University of Oxford17, Australian National University18, University of Saskatchewan19
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors highlight four core Earth System functions of water (hydroclimatic regulation, hydroecological regulation, storage, and transport) and propose a framework for detecting, monitoring, and establishing safe limits to water cycle modifications.
Abstract: Fresh water – the bloodstream of the biosphere – is at the centre of the planetary drama of the Anthropocene. Water fluxes and stores regulate the Earth’s climate and are essential for thriving aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, as well as water, food and energy security. But the water cycle is also being modified by humans at an unprecedented scale and rate. A holistic understanding of freshwater’s role for Earth System resilience and the detection and monitoring of anthropogenic water cycle modifications across scales is urgent, yet existing methods and frameworks are not well suited for this. In this paper we highlight four core Earth System functions of water (hydroclimatic regulation, hydroecological regulation, storage, and transport) and key related processes. Building on systems and resilience theory, we review the evidence of regional-scale regime shifts and disruptions of the Earth System functions of water. We then propose a framework for detecting, monitoring, and establishing safe limits to water cycle modifications, and identify four possible spatially explicit methods for their quantification. In sum, this paper presents an ambitious scientific and policy Grand Challenge that could substantially improve our understanding of the role of water in the Earth System and cross-scale management of water cycle modifications that would be a complementary approach to existing water management tools.
79 citations
Authors
Showing all 1418 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Martin A. Nowak | 148 | 591 | 94394 |
Paul J. Crutzen | 130 | 461 | 80651 |
Andreas Richter | 110 | 769 | 48262 |
David G. Streets | 106 | 364 | 42154 |
Drew Shindell | 102 | 340 | 49481 |
Wei Liu | 102 | 2927 | 65228 |
Jean-Francois Lamarque | 100 | 385 | 55326 |
Frank Dentener | 97 | 220 | 58666 |
James W. Vaupel | 89 | 434 | 34286 |
Keywan Riahi | 87 | 318 | 58030 |
Larry W. Horowitz | 85 | 253 | 28706 |
Robert J. Scholes | 84 | 253 | 37019 |
Mark A. Sutton | 83 | 423 | 30716 |
Brian Walsh | 82 | 233 | 29589 |
Börje Johansson | 82 | 871 | 30985 |