Institution
Jagiellonian University
Education•Krakow, Poland•
About: Jagiellonian University is a education organization based out in Krakow, Poland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Catalysis. The organization has 17438 authors who have published 44092 publications receiving 862633 citations. The organization is also known as: Academia Cracoviensis & Akademia Krakowska.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: It is suggested that urbanization and/or other population-level habitat differences may not only influence the expression of personality traits but also alter their inter-individual variability and the relationships among them, changing the structure of behavioral syndromes.
Abstract: Urbanization creates novel environments for wild animals where selection pressures may differ drastically from those in natural habitats. Adaptation to urban life involves changes in various traits, including behavior. Behavioral traits often vary consistently among individuals, and these so-called personality traits can be correlated with each other, forming behavioral syndromes. Despite their adaptive significance and potential to act as constraints, little is known about the role of animal personality and behavioral syndromes in animals' adaptation to urban habitats. In this study we tested whether differently urbanized habitats select for different personalities and behavioral syndromes by altering the population mean, inter-individual variability, and correlations of personality traits. We captured house sparrows (Passer domesticus) from four different populations along the gradient of urbanization and assessed their behavior in standardized test situations. We found individual consistency in neophobia, risk taking, and activity, constituting three personality axes. On the one hand, urbanization did not consistently affect the mean and variance of these traits, although there were significant differences between some of the populations in food neophobia and risk taking (both in means and variances). On the other hand, both urban and rural birds exhibited a behavioral syndrome including object neophobia, risk taking and activity, whereas food neophobia was part of the syndrome only in rural birds. These results indicate that there are population differences in certain aspects of personality in house sparrows, some of which may be related to habitat urbanization. Our findings suggest that urbanization and/or other population-level habitat differences may not only influence the expression of personality traits but also alter their inter-individual variability and the relationships among them, changing the structure of behavioral syndromes.
153 citations
••
TL;DR: The interaction of phenolics with proteins affects antioxidant efficacy and protein digestibility; thus, they have multiple effects on food quality and pro-health properties.
153 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the internal substructure of jets generated by QCD radiation is tested on an inclusive sample of jets recorded with the ATLAS detector in 2010, which corresponds to 35 pb(-1) of pp collisions delivered by the LHC at root s = 7 TeV.
Abstract: Recent studies have highlighted the potential of jet substructure techniques to identify the hadronic decays of boosted heavy particles. These studies all rely upon the assumption that the internal substructure of jets generated by QCD radiation is well understood. In this article, this assumption is tested on an inclusive sample of jets recorded with the ATLAS detector in 2010, which corresponds to 35 pb(-1) of pp collisions delivered by the LHC at root s = 7 TeV. In a subsample of events with single pp collisions, measurements corrected for detector efficiency and resolution are presented with full systematic uncertainties. Jet invariant mass, k(t) splitting scales and N-subjettiness variables are presented for anti-k(t) R = 1.0 jets and Cambridge-Aachen R = 1.2 jets. Jet invariant-mass spectra for Cambridge-Aachen R = 1.2 jets after a splitting and filtering procedure are also presented. Leading-order parton-shower Monte Carlo predictions for these variables are found to be broadly in agreement with data. The dependence of mean jet mass on additional pp interactions is also explored.
153 citations
••
TL;DR: Advice on the use of the minimal important difference (MID) is short, indeed much too short and it is advocated that dichotomizing the scores of patient-reported outcome measures facilitate interpretability of clinical trial results for those who need to understand trial results after a labelling claim has been granted.
Abstract: The evaluation and use of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures requires detailed understanding of the meaning of the outcome of interest. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently presented its draft guidance and view on the use of PRO measures as endpoints in clinical trials. One section of the guidance document specifically deals with advice about the use of the minimal important difference (MID) that we redefined as the smallest difference in score in the outcome of interest that informed patients or informed proxies perceive as important. The advice, however, is short, indeed much too short. We believe that expanding the section and making it more specific will benefit all stakeholders: patients, clinicians, other clinical decision makers, those designing trials and making claims, payers and the FDA. There is no "gold standard" methodology of estimating the MID or achieving the meaningfulness of clinical trial results based on patient reported outcomes. There are many methods of estimating the MID usually grouped into two distinct categories: anchor-based methods, that examine the relationship between scores on the target instrument and some independent measure, and distribution-based methods resorting to the statistical characteristics of the obtained scores. Estimation of an MID and interpretation of clinical trial results that present patient important outcomes is demanding but vital for informing the decision to recommend approve a given intervention. Investigators are encouraged to use reliable and valid methods to achieve meaningfulness of their results, preferably those that rely on patients to estimate what constitutes a minimal important, small, moderate, or large difference. However, acquiring the meaningfulness of PRO measures transcends beyond a concept of the MID and we advocate that dichotomizing the scores of patient-reported outcome measures facilitate interpretability of clinical trial results for those who need to understand trial results after a labelling claim has been granted. Irrespective of the strategy investigators use to estimate these values, from the individual patient perspective it is much more relevant if investigators report both the estimated thresholds and the proportion of patients achieving that benefit.
153 citations
••
University of Brescia1, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust2, Mansoura University3, Ahmadu Bello University4, Başkent University5, Mustafa Kemal University6, Sakarya University7, Medical University Plovdiv8, Hadassah Medical Center9, UCLA Medical Center10, Sapienza University of Rome11, University of California, San Diego12, Central University, India13, Qatar Airways14, State University of Campinas15, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens16, Karadeniz Technical University17, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram18, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki19, Erzincan University20, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics21, University of Belgrade22, Turku University Hospital23, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute24, Jagiellonian University Medical College25, LAC+USC Medical Center26, Inje University27, Edendale Hospital28, Mahidol University29, University Hospital Centre Zagreb30, University of the West Indies31, AHEPA University Hospital32, University of Ilorin33, King Abdullah University Hospital34, University of Valle35, SIDI36, King George's Medical University37, Bharati Vidyapeeth University38, Russells Hall Hospital39, Tan Tock Seng Hospital40, Russian Railways41, Jagiellonian University42, Tbilisi State Medical University43, University of Pécs44, Kocaeli University45, Memorial Hospital of South Bend46, Nankai University47
TL;DR: The results of the present study confirm the clinical value of imaging techniques and prognostic scores and confirm that appendectomy remains the most effective treatment of acute appendicitis.
Abstract: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical disease, and appendectomy is the treatment of choice in the majority of cases. A correct diagnosis is key for decreasing the negative appendectomy rate. The management can become difficult in case of complicated appendicitis. The aim of this study is to describe the worldwide clinical and diagnostic work-up and management of AA in surgical departments. This prospective multicenter observational study was performed in 116 worldwide surgical departments from 44 countries over a 6-month period (April 1, 2016–September 30, 2016). All consecutive patients admitted to surgical departments with a clinical diagnosis of AA were included in the study. A total of 4282 patients were enrolled in the POSAW study, 1928 (45%) women and 2354 (55%) men, with a median age of 29 years. Nine hundred and seven (21.2%) patients underwent an abdominal CT scan, 1856 (43.3%) patients an US, and 285 (6.7%) patients both CT scan and US. A total of 4097 (95.7%) patients underwent surgery; 1809 (42.2%) underwent open appendectomy and 2215 (51.7%) had laparoscopic appendectomy. One hundred eighty-five (4.3%) patients were managed conservatively. Major complications occurred in 199 patients (4.6%). The overall mortality rate was 0.28%. The results of the present study confirm the clinical value of imaging techniques and prognostic scores. Appendectomy remains the most effective treatment of acute appendicitis. Mortality rate is low.
153 citations
Authors
Showing all 17729 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Roxana Mehran | 141 | 1378 | 99398 |
Brad Abbott | 137 | 1566 | 98604 |
M. Morii | 134 | 1664 | 102074 |
M. Franklin | 134 | 1581 | 95304 |
John Huth | 131 | 1087 | 85341 |
Wladyslaw Dabrowski | 129 | 990 | 79728 |
Rostislav Konoplich | 128 | 811 | 73790 |
Michel Vetterli | 128 | 901 | 76064 |
Francois Corriveau | 128 | 1022 | 75729 |
Christoph Falk Anders | 126 | 734 | 68828 |
Tomasz Bulik | 121 | 698 | 86211 |
Elzbieta Richter-Was | 118 | 793 | 69127 |
S. H. Robertson | 116 | 1311 | 58582 |
S. J. Chen | 116 | 1559 | 62804 |
David M. Stern | 107 | 271 | 47461 |