Institution
Jagiellonian University
Education•Krakow, Poland•
About: Jagiellonian University is a education organization based out in Krakow, Poland. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Catalysis. The organization has 17438 authors who have published 44092 publications receiving 862633 citations. The organization is also known as: Academia Cracoviensis & Akademia Krakowska.
Topics: Population, Catalysis, Large Hadron Collider, Galaxy, European union
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Pennsylvania1, The Catholic University of America2, University of Southampton3, Technical University of Berlin4, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens5, University of Eastern Finland6, Jagiellonian University7, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven8, Carlos III Health Institute9, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery10, Dublin City University11, Karolinska Institutet12, Radboud University Nijmegen13
TL;DR: Differences in patient to nurse ratios and nurses' educational qualifications in nine of the 12 RN4CAST countries with similar patient discharge data were associated with variation in hospital mortality after common surgical procedures, implying an increased emphasis on bachelor's education for nurses could reduce preventable hospital deaths.
1,630 citations
••
TL;DR: KRAS mutational status was shown to be a highly predictive selection criterion in relation to the treatment decision regarding the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 for previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Abstract: Purpose This randomized study assessed whether the best overall response rate (ORR) of cetuximab combined with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX-4) was superior to that of FOLFOX-4 alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The influence of KRAS mutation status was investigated. Patients and Methods Patients received cetuximab (400 mg/m 2 initial dose followed by 250 mg/m 2 /wk thereafter) plus FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m 2 on day 1, plus leucovorin 200 mg/m 2 and fluorouracil as a 400 mg/m 2 bolus followed by a 600 mg/m 2 infusion during 22 hours on days 1 and 2; n 169) or FOLFOX-4 alone (n 168). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. KRAS mutation status was assessed in the subset of patients with assessable tumor samples (n 233). Results The confirmed ORR for cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 was higher than with FOLFOX-4 alone (46% v 36%). A statistically significant increase in the odds for a response with the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 could not be established (odds ratio 1.52; P .064). In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 was associated with a clinically significant increased chance of response (ORR 61% v 37%; odds ratio 2.54; P .011) and a lower risk of disease progression (hazard ratio 0.57; P .0163) compared with FOLFOX-4 alone. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 was generally well tolerated. Conclusion KRAS mutational status was shown to be a highly predictive selection criterion in relation to the treatment decision regarding the addition of cetuximab to FOLFOX-4 for previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:663-671. © 2008 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
1,587 citations
••
University of Pennsylvania1, The Catholic University of America2, University of London3, University of Southampton4, Carlos III Health Institute5, Karolinska Institutet6, Dublin City University7, Jagiellonian University8, University of Eastern Finland9, University of Basel10, Radboud University Nijmegen11, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens12
TL;DR: In European hospitals, improvement of hospital work environments might be a relatively low cost strategy to improve safety and quality in hospital care and to increase patient satisfaction.
Abstract: Objective To determine whether hospitals with a good organisation of care (such as improved nurse staffing and work environments) can affect patient care and nurse workforce stability in European countries. Design Cross sectional surveys of patients and nurses. Setting Nurses were surveyed in general acute care hospitals (488 in 12 European countries; 617 in the United States); patients were surveyed in 210 European hospitals and 430 US hospitals. Participants 33 659 nurses and 11 318 patients in Europe; 27 509 nurses and more than 120 000 patients in the US. Main outcome measures Nurse outcomes (hospital staffing, work environments, burnout, dissatisfaction, intention to leave job in the next year, patient safety, quality of care), patient outcomes (satisfaction overall and with nursing care, willingness to recommend hospitals). Results The percentage of nurses reporting poor or fair quality of patient care varied substantially by country (from 11% (Ireland) to 47% (Greece)), as did rates for nurses who gave their hospital a poor or failing safety grade (4% (Switzerland) to 18% (Poland)). We found high rates of nurse burnout (10% (Netherlands) to 78% (Greece)), job dissatisfaction (11% (Netherlands) to 56% (Greece)), and intention to leave (14% (US) to 49% (Finland, Greece)). Patients’ high ratings of their hospitals also varied considerably (35% (Spain) to 61% (Finland, Ireland)), as did rates of patients willing to recommend their hospital (53% (Greece) to 78% (Switzerland)). Improved work environments and reduced ratios of patients to nurses were associated with increased care quality and patient satisfaction. In European hospitals, after adjusting for hospital and nurse characteristics, nurses with better work environments were half as likely to report poor or fair care quality (adjusted odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.61) and give their hospitals poor or failing grades on patient safety (0.50, 0.44 to 0.56). Each additional patient per nurse increased the odds of nurses reporting poor or fair quality care (1.11, 1.07 to 1.15) and poor or failing safety grades (1.10, 1.05 to 1.16). Patients in hospitals with better work environments were more likely to rate their hospital highly (1.16, 1.03 to 1.32) and recommend their hospitals (1.20, 1.05 to 1.37), whereas those with higher ratios of patients to nurses were less likely to rate them highly (0.94, 0.91 to 0.97) or recommend them (0.95, 0.91 to 0.98). Results were similar in the US. Nurses and patients agreed on which hospitals provided good care and could be recommended. Conclusions Deficits in hospital care quality were common in all countries. Improvement of hospital work environments might be a relatively low cost strategy to improve safety and quality in hospital care and to increase patient satisfaction.
1,587 citations
••
Population Health Research Institute1, Centra2, Charles University in Prague3, University of Washington Medical Center4, Brigham and Women's Hospital5, National University of Ireland, Galway6, University College London7, Jagiellonian University8, University of Würzburg9, Semmelweis University10, Karolinska Institutet11, University of the Philippines12, University of La Frontera13, University of Cape Town14, Aalborg University15, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven16, Catholic University of Korea17, Monash University18, Universiti Teknologi MARA19, Paris Diderot University20
TL;DR: Among patients with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease, those assigned to rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin had better cardiovascular outcomes and more major bleeding events than those assign to aspirin alone.
Abstract: BackgroundWe evaluated whether rivaroxaban alone or in combination with aspirin would be more effective than aspirin alone for secondary cardiovascular prevention. MethodsIn this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 27,395 participants with stable atherosclerotic vascular disease to receive rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily), rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily), or aspirin (100 mg once daily). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The study was stopped for superiority of the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group after a mean follow-up of 23 months. ResultsThe primary outcome occurred in fewer patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group than in the aspirin-alone group (379 patients [4.1%] vs. 496 patients [5.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 0.86; P<0.001; z=−4.126), but major bleeding events occurred in more patients in the rivaroxaban-plus-aspirin group (288 patients [3.1%] vs. 170 patients [1....
1,587 citations
••
TL;DR: The number of adults with raised blood pressure increased from 594 million in 1975 to 1·13 billion in 2015, with the increase largely in low-income and middle-income countries, and the contributions of changes in prevalence versus population growth and ageing to the increase.
1,573 citations
Authors
Showing all 17729 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Roxana Mehran | 141 | 1378 | 99398 |
Brad Abbott | 137 | 1566 | 98604 |
M. Morii | 134 | 1664 | 102074 |
M. Franklin | 134 | 1581 | 95304 |
John Huth | 131 | 1087 | 85341 |
Wladyslaw Dabrowski | 129 | 990 | 79728 |
Rostislav Konoplich | 128 | 811 | 73790 |
Michel Vetterli | 128 | 901 | 76064 |
Francois Corriveau | 128 | 1022 | 75729 |
Christoph Falk Anders | 126 | 734 | 68828 |
Tomasz Bulik | 121 | 698 | 86211 |
Elzbieta Richter-Was | 118 | 793 | 69127 |
S. H. Robertson | 116 | 1311 | 58582 |
S. J. Chen | 116 | 1559 | 62804 |
David M. Stern | 107 | 271 | 47461 |