Institution
John Radcliffe Hospital
Healthcare•Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom•
About: John Radcliffe Hospital is a healthcare organization based out in Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Antigen. The organization has 14491 authors who have published 23670 publications receiving 1459015 citations.
Topics: Population, Antigen, Transplantation, Gene, Immune system
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: A historical perspective of their discovery is provided and their established functions in sensing and responding to genotoxic stress are discussed, as well as emerging non-canonical roles and how knowledge of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK is being translated to benefit human health.
1,175 citations
••
TL;DR: The results provide reliable evidence of benefit from screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms, and the Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study was designed to assess whether or not such screening is beneficial.
1,156 citations
••
Mayo Clinic1, New York University2, University of Hamburg3, George Washington University4, University of Girona5, Johns Hopkins University6, St George's, University of London7, Harvard University8, University of Ottawa9, Hospital for Sick Children10, University of Miami11, Paris Descartes University12, University College London13, University of Sydney14, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center15, John Radcliffe Hospital16, University of Amsterdam17, Indiana University18
TL;DR: This international consensus statement provides the state of genetic testing for the channelopathy and cardiomyopathies and summarizes the opinion of the international writing group members based on their own experience and on a general review of the literature with respect to the use and role of geneticTesting for these potentially heritable cardiac conditions.
Abstract: This international consensus statement provides the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. It summarizes the opinion of the international writing group members based on their own experience and on a general review of the literature with respect to the use and role of genetic testing for these potentially heritable cardiac conditions. This document focuses primarily on the state of genetic testing for the 13 distinct entities detailed and the relative diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic impact of the genetic test result for each entity. It does not focus on the therapeutic management of the various channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. Treatment/management issues are only discussed for those diseases (i.e., LQTS, HCM, DCM + CCD, RCM) in which the genetic test result could potentially influence treatment considerations.
Writing recommendations for genetic diseases require adaptation of the methodology normally adopted to prepare guidelines for clinical practice. Documents produced by other scientific societies have acknowledged the need to define the criteria used to rank the strength of recommendation for genetic diseases.1
The most obvious difference is that randomized and/or blinded studies do not exist. Instead, most of the available data are derived from registries that have followed patients and recorded outcome information. The authors of this statement have therefore defined specific criteria for Class I, Class IIa or b, and Class III recommendations and have used the conventional language adopted by AHA/ACC/ESC Guidelines to express each class. All recommendations are level of evidence (LOE) C (i.e., based on experts' opinions).
A Class I recommendation ( “is recommended” ) was applied for genetic testing in index cases with a sound clinical suspicion for the presence of a channelopathy or a cardiomyopathy when the positive predictive value of a genetic test is high (likelihood of positive result >40% and signal/noise ratio >10; Table 3), AND/OR when …
1,147 citations
••
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven1, Gdańsk Medical University2, University of Valencia3, Ghent University4, Charles University in Prague5, University of Glasgow6, University of Naples Federico II7, Utrecht University8, Linköping University9, University of Münster10, University of Oslo11, Complutense University of Madrid12, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg13, John Radcliffe Hospital14, Tallinn University of Technology15, University of Lausanne16
TL;DR: The 2013 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines continue to adhere to some fundamental principles that inspired the 2003 and 2007 guidelines, namely to base recommendations on properly conducted studies identified from an ext
Abstract: 1. INTRODUCTION1.1 PrinciplesThe 2013 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines continue to adhere to some fundamental principles that inspired the 2003 and 2007 guidelines, namely to base recommendations on properly conducted studies identified from an ext
1,139 citations
••
TL;DR: It is believed that this strategy can be successfully applied at present in order to unravel the contribution of rare variants to the multifactorial inheritance of common diseases, which could lead to the implementation of much needed preventative screening schemes.
Abstract: Here, we give a historical overview of the search for genetic variants that influence the susceptibility of an individual to a chronic disease, from RA Fisher's seminal work to the current excitement of whole-genome association studies (WGAS). We then discuss the concepts behind the identification of common variants as disease causal factors and contrast them to the basic ideas that underlie the rare variant hypothesis. The identification of rare variants involves the careful selection of candidate genes to examine, the availability of highly efficient resequencing techniques and the appropriate assessment of the functional consequences of the implicated variant. We believe that this strategy can be successfully applied at present in order to unravel the contribution of rare variants to the multifactorial inheritance of common diseases, which could lead to the implementation of much needed preventative screening schemes.
1,131 citations
Authors
Showing all 14542 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Douglas G. Altman | 253 | 1001 | 680344 |
Salim Yusuf | 231 | 1439 | 252912 |
David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
Mark I. McCarthy | 200 | 1028 | 187898 |
Stuart H. Orkin | 186 | 715 | 112182 |
Richard Peto | 183 | 683 | 231434 |
Ralph M. Steinman | 171 | 453 | 121518 |
Adrian L. Harris | 170 | 1084 | 120365 |
Rory Collins | 162 | 489 | 193407 |
Nicholas J. White | 161 | 1352 | 104539 |
David W. Johnson | 160 | 2714 | 140778 |
David Cella | 156 | 1258 | 106402 |
Edmund T. Rolls | 153 | 612 | 77928 |
Martin A. Nowak | 148 | 591 | 94394 |
Kypros H. Nicolaides | 147 | 1302 | 87091 |