scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

La Trobe University

EducationMelbourne, Victoria, Australia
About: La Trobe University is a education organization based out in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 13370 authors who have published 41291 publications receiving 1138269 citations. The organization is also known as: LaTrobe University & LTU.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a model for the growth of few layer graphene on SiC{0001} is developed, wherein each new graphene layer is formed at the bottom of the existing stack rather than on its top.
Abstract: Thermally induced growth of graphene on the two polar surfaces of $6H\text{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{Si}\mathrm{C}$ is investigated with emphasis on the initial stages of growth and interface structure. The experimental methods employed are angle-resolved valence band photoelectron spectroscopy, soft x-ray induced core-level spectroscopy, and low-energy electron diffraction. On the Si-terminated (0001) surface, the $(6\sqrt{3}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}6\sqrt{3})R30\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$ reconstruction is the precursor of the growth of graphene and it persists at the interface upon the growth of few layer graphene (FLG). The $(6\sqrt{3}\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}6\sqrt{3})R30\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$ structure is a carbon layer with graphene-like atomic arrangement covalently bonded to the substrate where it is responsible for the azimuthal ordering of FLG on SiC(0001). In contrast, the interaction between graphene and the C-terminated $(000\overline{1})$ surface is much weaker, which accounts for the low degree of order of FLG on this surface. A model for the growth of FLG on SiC{0001} is developed, wherein each new graphene layer is formed at the bottom of the existing stack rather than on its top. This model yields, in conjunction with the differences in the interfacial bonding strength, a natural explanation for the different degrees of azimuthal order observed for FLG on the two surfaces.

824 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Lorenzo Galluzzi1, J M Bravo-San Pedro2, Ilio Vitale, Stuart A. Aaronson3, John M. Abrams4, Dieter Adam5, Emad S. Alnemri6, Lucia Altucci7, David W. Andrews8, Margherita Annicchiarico-Petruzzelli, Eric H. Baehrecke9, Nicolas G. Bazan10, Mathieu J.M. Bertrand11, Mathieu J.M. Bertrand12, Katiuscia Bianchi13, Katiuscia Bianchi14, Mikhail V. Blagosklonny15, Klas Blomgren16, Christoph Borner17, Dale E. Bredesen18, Dale E. Bredesen19, Catherine Brenner20, Catherine Brenner21, Michelangelo Campanella22, Eleonora Candi23, Francesco Cecconi23, Francis Ka-Ming Chan9, Navdeep S. Chandel24, Emily H. Cheng25, Jerry E. Chipuk3, John A. Cidlowski26, Aaron Ciechanover27, Ted M. Dawson28, Valina L. Dawson28, V De Laurenzi29, R De Maria, Klaus-Michael Debatin30, N. Di Daniele23, Vishva M. Dixit31, Brian David Dynlacht32, Wafik S. El-Deiry33, Gian Maria Fimia34, Richard A. Flavell35, Simone Fulda36, Carmen Garrido37, Marie-Lise Gougeon38, Douglas R. Green, Hinrich Gronemeyer39, György Hajnóczky6, J M Hardwick28, Michael O. Hengartner40, Hidenori Ichijo41, Bertrand Joseph16, Philipp J. Jost42, Thomas Kaufmann43, Oliver Kepp2, Daniel J. Klionsky44, Richard A. Knight45, Richard A. Knight22, Sharad Kumar46, Sharad Kumar47, John J. Lemasters48, Beth Levine49, Beth Levine50, Andreas Linkermann5, Stuart A. Lipton, Richard A. Lockshin51, Carlos López-Otín52, Enrico Lugli, Frank Madeo53, Walter Malorni54, Jean-Christophe Marine55, Seamus J. Martin56, J-C Martinou57, Jan Paul Medema58, Pascal Meier, Sonia Melino23, Noboru Mizushima41, Ute M. Moll59, Cristina Muñoz-Pinedo, Gabriel Núñez44, Andrew Oberst60, Theocharis Panaretakis16, Josef M. Penninger, Marcus E. Peter24, Mauro Piacentini23, Paolo Pinton61, Jochen H. M. Prehn62, Hamsa Puthalakath63, Gabriel A. Rabinovich64, Kodi S. Ravichandran65, Rosario Rizzuto66, Cecília M. P. Rodrigues67, David C. Rubinsztein68, Thomas Rudel69, Yufang Shi70, Hans-Uwe Simon43, Brent R. Stockwell50, Brent R. Stockwell71, Gyorgy Szabadkai66, Gyorgy Szabadkai22, Stephen W.G. Tait72, H. L. Tang28, Nektarios Tavernarakis73, Nektarios Tavernarakis74, Yoshihide Tsujimoto, T Vanden Berghe12, T Vanden Berghe11, Peter Vandenabeele11, Peter Vandenabeele12, Andreas Villunger75, Erwin F. Wagner76, Henning Walczak22, Eileen White77, W. G. Wood78, Junying Yuan79, Zahra Zakeri80, Boris Zhivotovsky16, Boris Zhivotovsky81, Gerry Melino45, Gerry Melino23, Guido Kroemer1 
Paris Descartes University1, Institut Gustave Roussy2, Mount Sinai Hospital3, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center4, University of Kiel5, Thomas Jefferson University6, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli7, University of Toronto8, University of Massachusetts Medical School9, Louisiana State University10, Ghent University11, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology12, Cancer Research UK13, Queen Mary University of London14, Roswell Park Cancer Institute15, Karolinska Institutet16, University of Freiburg17, University of California, San Francisco18, Buck Institute for Research on Aging19, French Institute of Health and Medical Research20, Université Paris-Saclay21, University College London22, University of Rome Tor Vergata23, Northwestern University24, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center25, National Institutes of Health26, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology27, Johns Hopkins University28, University of Chieti-Pescara29, University of Ulm30, Genentech31, New York University32, Pennsylvania State University33, University of Salento34, Yale University35, Goethe University Frankfurt36, University of Burgundy37, Pasteur Institute38, University of Strasbourg39, University of Zurich40, University of Tokyo41, Technische Universität München42, University of Bern43, University of Michigan44, Medical Research Council45, University of Adelaide46, University of South Australia47, Medical University of South Carolina48, University of Texas at Dallas49, Howard Hughes Medical Institute50, St. John's University51, University of Oviedo52, University of Graz53, Istituto Superiore di Sanità54, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven55, Trinity College, Dublin56, University of Geneva57, University of Amsterdam58, Stony Brook University59, University of Washington60, University of Ferrara61, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland62, La Trobe University63, University of Buenos Aires64, University of Virginia65, University of Padua66, University of Lisbon67, University of Cambridge68, University of Würzburg69, Soochow University (Suzhou)70, Columbia University71, University of Glasgow72, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas73, University of Crete74, Innsbruck Medical University75, Carlos III Health Institute76, Rutgers University77, University of Minnesota78, Harvard University79, City University of New York80, Moscow State University81
TL;DR: The Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.
Abstract: Cells exposed to extreme physicochemical or mechanical stimuli die in an uncontrollable manner, as a result of their immediate structural breakdown. Such an unavoidable variant of cellular demise is generally referred to as ‘accidental cell death’ (ACD). In most settings, however, cell death is initiated by a genetically encoded apparatus, correlating with the fact that its course can be altered by pharmacologic or genetic interventions. ‘Regulated cell death’ (RCD) can occur as part of physiologic programs or can be activated once adaptive responses to perturbations of the extracellular or intracellular microenvironment fail. The biochemical phenomena that accompany RCD may be harnessed to classify it into a few subtypes, which often (but not always) exhibit stereotyped morphologic features. Nonetheless, efficiently inhibiting the processes that are commonly thought to cause RCD, such as the activation of executioner caspases in the course of apoptosis, does not exert true cytoprotective effects in the mammalian system, but simply alters the kinetics of cellular demise as it shifts its morphologic and biochemical correlates. Conversely, bona fide cytoprotection can be achieved by inhibiting the transduction of lethal signals in the early phases of the process, when adaptive responses are still operational. Thus, the mechanisms that truly execute RCD may be less understood, less inhibitable and perhaps more homogeneous than previously thought. Here, the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death formulates a set of recommendations to help scientists and researchers to discriminate between essential and accessory aspects of cell death.

809 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a meta-analysis of 29 studies confirms significant and positive relationships between disclosure levels and corporate size, listing status and leverage, while no significant association is found between corporate profitability or size of audit firm, with aggregate disclosure levels.
Abstract: Accounting researchers have investigated associations between corporate characteristics and disclosures in corporate annual reports since 1961. Findings have consistently shown corporate size and listing status to be significantly associated with disclosure levels, while mixed results have been reported for leverage, profitability, and audit firm size. The purpose of the present paper is to integrate prior disclosure studies and to identify the underlying factors that moderate the apparent variation in results. A meta-analysis of 29 studies confirms significant and positive relationships between disclosure levels and corporate size, listing status and leverage. No significant association is found between corporate profitability or size of audit firm, with aggregate disclosure levels. This study also found that in addition to sampling error, the results are moderated by differences in disclosure index construction, differences in definition of the explanatory variables, and differences in research settings.

806 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
10 Jan 2003-Cell
TL;DR: In mammals, the cytosolic chaperones Hsp90 and Hsp70 dock onto a specialized TPR domain in the import receptor Tom70 at the outer mitochondrial membrane to deliver a set of preproteins to the receptor for subsequent membrane translocation dependent on the Hsp 90 ATPase.

802 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
31 Mar 2011-Nature
TL;DR: It is concluded that by enabling linear ubiquitination in the TNF receptor signalling complex, SHARPIN interferes with TNF-induced cell death and, thereby, prevents inflammation.
Abstract: Members of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily have important functions in immunity and inflammation Recently linear ubiquitin chains assembled by a complex containing HOIL-1 and HOIP (also known as RBCK1 and RNF31, respectively) were implicated in TNF signalling, yet their relevance in vivo remained uncertain Here we identify SHARPIN as a third component of the linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex, recruited to the CD40 and TNF receptor signalling complexes together with its other constituents, HOIL-1 and HOIP Mass spectrometry of TNF signalling complexes revealed RIP1 (also known as RIPK1) and NEMO (also known as IKKγ or IKBKG) to be linearly ubiquitinated Mutation of the Sharpin gene (Sharpin(cpdm/cpdm)) causes chronic proliferative dermatitis (cpdm) characterized by inflammatory skin lesions and defective lymphoid organogenesis Gene induction by TNF, CD40 ligand and interleukin-1β was attenuated in cpdm-derived cells which were rendered sensitive to TNF-induced death Importantly, Tnf gene deficiency prevented skin lesions in cpdm mice We conclude that by enabling linear ubiquitination in the TNF receptor signalling complex, SHARPIN interferes with TNF-induced cell death and, thereby, prevents inflammation Our results provide evidence for the relevance of linear ubiquitination in vivo in preventing inflammation and regulating immune signalling

799 citations


Authors

Showing all 13601 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Rasmus Nielsen13555684898
C. N. R. Rao133164686718
James Whelan12878689180
Jacqueline Batley119121268752
Eske Willerslev11536743039
Jonathan E. Shaw114629108114
Ary A. Hoffmann11390755354
Mike Clarke1131037164328
Richard J. Simpson11385059378
Alan F. Cowman11137938240
David C. Page11050944119
Richard Gray10980878580
David S. Wishart10852376652
Alan G. Marshall107106046904
David A. Williams10663342058
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Queensland
155.7K papers, 5.7M citations

96% related

University of Sydney
187.3K papers, 6.1M citations

95% related

University of Melbourne
174.8K papers, 6.3M citations

95% related

Australian National University
109.2K papers, 4.3M citations

94% related

University of New South Wales
153.6K papers, 4.8M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023102
2022398
20213,407
20202,992
20192,661
20182,394