Institution
Langley Research Center
Facility•Hampton, Virginia, United States•
About: Langley Research Center is a facility organization based out in Hampton, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Mach number & Wind tunnel. The organization has 15945 authors who have published 37602 publications receiving 821623 citations. The organization is also known as: NASA Langley & NASA Langley Research Center.
Topics: Mach number, Wind tunnel, Aerodynamics, Boundary layer, Supersonic speed
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
University of Iowa1, Andrés Bello National University2, Massachusetts Institute of Technology3, University of California, Irvine4, Langley Research Center5, Goddard Space Flight Center6, Colorado State University7, Carnegie Institution for Science8, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration9, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences10
TL;DR: This work successfully modeled the persistent vertical drawdown of atmospheric COS using the quantitative relation between COS and photosynthesis that has been measured in plant chamber experiments, and provides quantitative evidence that COS gradients in the continental growing season may have broad use as a measurement-based photosynthesis tracer.
Abstract: Climate models incorporate photosynthesis-climate feedbacks, yet we lack robust tools for large-scale assessments of these processes. Recent work suggests that carbonyl sulfide (COS), a trace gas consumed by plants, could provide a valuable constraint on photosynthesis. Here we analyze airborne observations of COS and carbon dioxide concentrations during the growing season over North America with a three-dimensional atmospheric transport model. We successfully modeled the persistent vertical drawdown of atmospheric COS using the quantitative relation between COS and photosynthesis that has been measured in plant chamber experiments. Furthermore, this drawdown is driven by plant uptake rather than other continental and oceanic fluxes in the model. These results provide quantitative evidence that COS gradients in the continental growing season may have broad use as a measurement-based photosynthesis tracer.
198 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, a GPS reflectometer installed on an HC130 aircraft during the Soil Moisture Experiment 2002 (SMEX02) near Ames, Iowa was used to estimate the strength of the reflected signals by either assuming an approximately specular surface reflection or inferring the surface slope probability density and associated normalization constants.
197 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the effect of sensor spatial resolution on satellite-derived estimates of cloud fractional coverage is quantified on the basis of Landsat satellite radiance data, and it is found that cloud fraction is found to depend on cloud algorithm as much as it depends on sensor spatial resolutions.
Abstract: The effect of sensor spatial resolution on satellite-derived estimates of cloud fractional coverage is quantified on the basis of Landsat satellite radiance data. Cloud fraction is found to depend on cloud algorithm as much as it depends on sensor spatial resolution. Even for 28.5-m spatial resolution data, large cloud fraction differences exist between algorithms. Satellite cloud retrieval algorithms depend strongly on sensor spatial resolution and/or on the optical depth of the cloud field. When present, spatial resolution effects are small (less than 0.01) for pixel diameter less than 1/4 km and are large for pixel diameter larger than 1 km. The International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project bispectral threshold gives an increase in cloud fraction of 0.11 as spatial resolution degrades from 20 m to 8 km. The spatial coherence algorithm underestimates boundary layer cloud fraction by 0.18. The use of functional box counting and an assumption of fractal scale invariance overestimates the dependence of cloud fraction for spatial scales below 1 km.
197 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined various first order approximation methods commonly used in structural optimization and proposed an adaptation of a first order method using an exponent adjusted to better fit the constraints and reduce the overall number of iterations needed to attain the optimum.
Abstract: This paper examines various first order approximation methods commonly used in structural optimization. It considers several attempts at improving the approximation by using previous analytical results and introduces an adaptation of a first order approximation method using an exponent adjusted to better fit the constraints and reduce the overall number of iterations needed to attain the optimum.
197 citations
••
TL;DR: The Independent Pixel approximation (IPA) is one of the simplest methods of computing solar radiative fluxes for inhomogencous clouds as discussed by the authors, which can be used to compute mean cloud albedo.
Abstract: The Independent Pixel approximation (IPA) is one of the simplest methods of computing solar radiative fluxes for inhomogencous clouds. It claims that if p(τ) is a normalized probability density function for cloud optical depth τ and Rpp(τ) is plane-parallel, homogeneous (PPH) albedo, mean cloud albedo can be approximated by integrating p(τ)Rpp(τ) over all τ. The purpose of this study is to assess the ability of the gamma distribution function to represent p(τ) for marine boundary layer clouds and to examine the accuracy of the ensuing gamma IPA albedos. In a separate study, pixel values of τ were inferred from high spatial resolution Landsat imagery of marine boundary layer clouds. The present study utilizes 45 images, each measuring (58 km)2. For each image, a density function pobs(τ) is estimated, and, using the mean τ¯ and variance of τ, a corresponding truncated gamma distribution function pγ(τ) is defined. For a diverse range of clouds, pγ(τ) usually approximate pobs(τ) well. The best result...
197 citations
Authors
Showing all 16015 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Daniel J. Jacob | 162 | 656 | 76530 |
Donald R. Blake | 118 | 727 | 49697 |
Veerabhadran Ramanathan | 100 | 301 | 47561 |
Raja Parasuraman | 91 | 402 | 41455 |
Robert W. Platt | 88 | 638 | 31918 |
James M. Russell | 87 | 691 | 29383 |
Daniel J. Inman | 83 | 918 | 37920 |
Antony Jameson | 79 | 474 | 31518 |
Ya-Ping Sun | 79 | 277 | 28722 |
Patrick M. Crill | 79 | 228 | 20850 |
Richard B. Miles | 78 | 759 | 25239 |
Patrick Minnis | 77 | 490 | 23403 |
Robert W. Talbot | 77 | 297 | 19783 |
Raphael T. Haftka | 76 | 773 | 28111 |
Jack E. Dibb | 75 | 344 | 18399 |