Institution
Langley Research Center
Facility•Hampton, Virginia, United States•
About: Langley Research Center is a facility organization based out in Hampton, Virginia, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Mach number & Wind tunnel. The organization has 15945 authors who have published 37602 publications receiving 821623 citations. The organization is also known as: NASA Langley & NASA Langley Research Center.
Topics: Mach number, Wind tunnel, Aerodynamics, Boundary layer, Supersonic speed
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The design of the airborne HSRL, the internal calibration and accuracy of the instrument, data products produced, and observations and calibration data from the first two field missions are discussed.
Abstract: A compact, highly robust airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar (HSRL) that provides measurements of aerosol backscatter and extinction coefficients and aerosol depolarization at two wavelengths has been developed, tested, and deployed on nine field experiments (over 650 flight hours). A unique and advantageous design element of the HSRL system is the ability to radiometrically calibrate the instrument internally, eliminating any reliance on vicarious calibration from atmospheric targets for which aerosol loading must be estimated. This paper discusses the design of the airborne HSRL, the internal calibration and accuracy of the instrument, data products produced, and observations and calibration data from the first two field missions: the Joint Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment--Phase B (INTEX-B)/Megacity Aerosol Experiment--Mexico City (MAX-Mex)/Megacities Impacts on Regional and Global Environment (MILAGRO) field mission (hereafter MILAGRO) and the Gulf of Mexico Atmospheric Composition and Climate Study/Texas Air Quality Study II (hereafter GoMACCS/TexAQS II).
426 citations
••
Massachusetts Institute of Technology1, University of Alaska Fairbanks2, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution3, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research4, University of Bremen5, California Institute of Technology6, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration7, Texas State University8, Pennsylvania State University9, Lund University10, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research11, VU University Amsterdam12, Utah State University13, United States Naval Academy14, Environment Canada15, University of Gothenburg16, University of Cambridge17, Naval Postgraduate School18, University of California, Irvine19, University of Washington20, University College London21, Langley Research Center22, University of Wisconsin-Madison23, Finnish Meteorological Institute24, Leipzig University25, Columbia University26, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology27
TL;DR: The Arctic has warmed more than twice as fast as the global average since the late twentieth century, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification (AA), and progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms that link it to midlatitude weather variability as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: The Arctic has warmed more than twice as fast as the global average since the late twentieth century, a phenomenon known as Arctic amplification (AA). Recently, there have been considerable advances in understanding the physical contributions to AA, and progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms that link it to midlatitude weather variability. Observational studies overwhelmingly support that AA is contributing to winter continental cooling. Although some model experiments support the observational evidence, most modelling results show little connection between AA and severe midlatitude weather or suggest the export of excess heating from the Arctic to lower latitudes. Divergent conclusions between model and observational studies, and even intramodel studies, continue to obfuscate a clear understanding of how AA is influencing midlatitude weather.
423 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider the selection of inflow values at boundaries far upstream of an aircraft, for one-and two-equation turbulence models, and show that floor values for the turbulence variables, outside the viscous sublayer, are physically justified.
Abstract: The selection of inflow values at boundaries far upstream of an aircraft is considered, for one- and two-equation turbulence models. Inflow values are distinguished from the ambient values near the aircraft, which may be much smaller. Ambient values should be selected first, and inflow values that will lead to them after the decay second; this is not always possible, especially for the time scale. The two-equation decay during the approach to the aircraft is shown; often, the time scale has been set too short for this decay to be calculated accurately on typical grids. A simple remedy for both issues is to impose floor values for the turbulence variables, outside the viscous sublayer, and it is argued that overriding the equations in this manner is physically justified. Selecting laminar ambient values is easy, if the boundary layers are to be tripped, but a more common practice is to seek ambient values that will cause immediate transition in boundary layers. This opens up a wide range of values, and selection criteria are discussed. The turbulent Reynolds number, or ratio of eddy viscosity to laminar viscosity has a huge dynamic range that makes it unwieldy; it has been widely mis-used, particularly by codes that set upper limits on it. The value of turbulent kinetic energy in a wind tunnel or the atmosphere is also of dubious value as an input to the model. Concretely, the ambient eddy viscosity must be small enough to preserve potential cores in small geometry features, such as flap gaps. The ambient frequency scale should also be small enough, compared with shear rates in the boundary layer. Specific values are recommended and demonstrated for airfoil flows
422 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used a global chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem) to estimate the impact of transpacific transport of mineral dust on aerosol concentrations in North America during 2001.
422 citations
••
01 Jan 1998TL;DR: In this paper, a low speed wind tunnel data have been acquired for planar panels covered by uniform, glow-discharge surface plasma in atmospheric pressure air known as the One Atmosphere Uniform Glow Discharge Plasma (OAUGDP).
Abstract: Low speed wind tunnel data have been acquired for planar panels covered by a uniform, glow-discharge surface plasma in atmospheric pressure air known as the One Atmosphere Uniform Glow Discharge Plasma (OAUGDP). Streamwise and spanwise arrays of flush, plasma-generating surface electrodes have been studied in laminar, transitional, and fully turbulent boundary layer flow. Plasma between symmetric streamwise electrode strips caused large increases in panel drag, whereas asymmetric spanwise electrode configurations produced a significant thrust. Smoke wire flow visualization and mean velocity diagnostics show the primary cause of the phenomena to be a combination of mass transport and vortical structures induced by strong paraelectric electrohydrodynamic (EHD) body forces on the flow.
421 citations
Authors
Showing all 16015 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Daniel J. Jacob | 162 | 656 | 76530 |
Donald R. Blake | 118 | 727 | 49697 |
Veerabhadran Ramanathan | 100 | 301 | 47561 |
Raja Parasuraman | 91 | 402 | 41455 |
Robert W. Platt | 88 | 638 | 31918 |
James M. Russell | 87 | 691 | 29383 |
Daniel J. Inman | 83 | 918 | 37920 |
Antony Jameson | 79 | 474 | 31518 |
Ya-Ping Sun | 79 | 277 | 28722 |
Patrick M. Crill | 79 | 228 | 20850 |
Richard B. Miles | 78 | 759 | 25239 |
Patrick Minnis | 77 | 490 | 23403 |
Robert W. Talbot | 77 | 297 | 19783 |
Raphael T. Haftka | 76 | 773 | 28111 |
Jack E. Dibb | 75 | 344 | 18399 |