scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Lehigh University

EducationBethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
About: Lehigh University is a education organization based out in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Catalysis & Fracture mechanics. The organization has 12684 authors who have published 26550 publications receiving 770061 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identified the following eight success factors for manufacturing networks of SMEs, which are ranked by perceived degree of importance to the success of the network: (1) participant character,. (2) chief executive officer (CEO) support; (3) confidence; (4) dedication; (5) capabilities; (6) external relationships; (7) intermediary; and (8) information technology.
Abstract: While networking among small and medium-sized manufacturing firms (SMEs) is a growing phenomenon, there has been little empirical study of the factors that lead to the success of these networks. This study identifies the following eight success factors for manufacturing networks of SMEs, which are ranked by perceived degree of importance to the success of the network: (1) participant character,. (2) chief executive officer (CEO) support; (3) confidence; (4) dedication; (5) capabilities; (6) external relationships; (7) intermediary; and (8) information technology. Four success factors were perceived to be significantly more important in joint production and marketing networks compared to joint learning and resource sharing networks: (1) participant character; (2) confidence; (3) external relationships; and (4) information technology. Introduction Manufacturing networks, groups of firms that combine forces to achieve competitive advantages that would be difficult to achieve individually, are growing among small manufacturing firms (Selz 1992; Port 1995; Malecki and Tootle 1996; Suarez-Villa 1998). Networking offers material benefits such as increased sales and/or lower costs, psychological benefits (recognition that problems are shared), and developmental benefits such as learning to adapt to changing economic environments (U.S. Net 1995). Coordination among these groups of firms is characterized by informal systems rather than by formal contractual relationships to manage complex products or services in uncertain and competitive environments (Jones, Hersterly, and Borgatti 1997). There are different forms of collaboration among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) (U.S. Net 1995). For many years businesses joined traditional industry associations such as American Meat Institute and the Woodworking Machinery Industry Association. These associations charged dues, represented the industry's interests to government and regulatory agencies, and provided opportunities for a certain level of joint problem solving by sponsoring conferences and trade shows. However, members' business success did not depend significantly upon the actions of others in the association. Today many manufacturing companies are joining networks in which participation has a much more direct impact on business success. For example, the members of Agile Web, Inc. jointly produce products. Each participant's effort affects the business success of all members (Sherer and Adams 2001). Learning and resource networks, referred to as "soft networks," bring firms together to learn about changes needed to improve competitiveness and to share resources such as training, waste management, or health insurance (Bosworth 1995; U.S. Net 1995). Comarketing and coproduction networks (including supply chain networks) have been referred to as "hard networks" (Bosworth 1995) because they require a higher level of interdependence compared to soft networks and hence have greater risk. There has been little empirical study on critical success factors in these networks and no comparison of success factors in networks with different objectives. Much of the research on networks has been either on large firm strategic alliances (Human and Provan 1997) or on informal and social networks (Dubini and Aldrich 1991). Based on a review of the predominant success factors identified in the literature as well as case studies of small manufacturing networks, this paper identifies critical factors that are expected to affect SME networks and then ranks these factors in terms of perceived importance. Since the risks differ between hard and soft networks, it is expected that network type moderates the impact of these factors on network success, with greater importance of the critical success factors for hard networks compared to soft networks. The Growth Of Manufacturing Networks Large companies have long formed strategic alliances--agreements to share the costs, risks, and benefits associated with new business opportunities--either through formal joint ventures or long-term contracts (Hill and Jones 1995). …

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the process by which customers recover from self-service technology failures using their own effort and explore their decisions to stay with or switch from the SST.

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, an ethnographic approach was employed to study a bank in the northeastern U.S. that underwent organizational change and transformation in response to the dema-cation crisis.
Abstract: This article reports research in which an ethnographic approach was employed to study a bank in the northeastern U.S. that underwent organizational change and transformation in response to the dema...

171 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the slip band at the tip of a small fatigue crack interacting with grain boundaries is modelled for four cases: a slip band not reaching the grain boundary, a slip-band blocked by the boundary, slip band propagated into an adjacent grain, and then blocked by a second grain boundary.

170 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2003-Polymer
TL;DR: In this paper, the static fracture toughness behavior of glass filled epoxies was studied using single-edge-notched 3 point bend (SEN-3PB) tests using three different types of glass reinforcements, large glass spheres, small glass spheres (SGS), and glass fibers (GF), were examined.

170 citations


Authors

Showing all 12785 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yang Yang1712644153049
Gang Chen1673372149819
Yi Yang143245692268
Mark D. Griffiths124123861335
Michael Gill12181086338
Masaki Mori110220066676
Kai Nan An10995351638
James R. Rice10827868943
Vinayak P. Dravid10381743612
Andrew M. Jones10376437253
Israel E. Wachs10342732029
Demetrios N. Christodoulides10070451093
Bert M. Weckhuysen10076740945
José Luis García Fierro100102747228
Mordechai Segev9972940073
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

94% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

94% related

University of Maryland, College Park
155.9K papers, 7.2M citations

94% related

Purdue University
163.5K papers, 5.7M citations

94% related

Massachusetts Institute of Technology
268K papers, 18.2M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202338
2022140
20211,040
20201,054
2019933
2018935