scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Livestrong Foundation

NonprofitAustin, Texas, United States
About: Livestrong Foundation is a nonprofit organization based out in Austin, Texas, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 70 authors who have published 231 publications receiving 16662 citations. The organization is also known as: Lance Armstrong Foundation.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This Review will discuss specific PDTX disease examples illustrating an overview of the opportunities and limitations of these models in cancer drug development, and describe concepts regarding predictive biomarker development and future applications.
Abstract: Progress in oncology drug development has been hampered by a lack of preclinical models that reliably predict clinical activity of novel compounds in cancer patients. In an effort to address these shortcomings, there has been a recent increase in the use of patient-derived tumour xenografts (PDTX) engrafted into immune-compromised rodents such as athymic nude or NOD/SCID mice for preclinical modelling. Numerous tumour-specific PDTX models have been established and, importantly, they are biologically stable when passaged in mice in terms of global gene-expression patterns, mutational status, metastatic potential, drug responsiveness and tumour architecture. These characteristics might provide significant improvements over standard cell-line xenograft models. This Review will discuss specific PDTX disease examples illustrating an overview of the opportunities and limitations of these models in cancer drug development, and describe concepts regarding predictive biomarker development and future applications.

1,093 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The recommended dose for disease-directed studies of OSI-774 administered orally on a daily, continuous, uninterrupted schedule is 150 mg/d, and several patients with epidermoid malignancies demonstrated either antitumor activity or relatively long periods of stable disease.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering OSI-774, to recommend a dose on a protracted, continuous daily schedule, to characterize its pharmacokinetic behavior, and to acquire preliminary evidence of anticancer activity PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of OSI-774 in three study parts (A to C) to evaluate progressively longer treatment intervals Part A patients received OSI-774 25 to 100 mg once daily, for 3 days each week, for 3 weeks every 4 weeks Part B patients received OSI-774 doses ranging from 50 to 200 mg given once daily for 3 weeks every 4 weeks to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) In part C, patients received this MTD on a continuous, uninterrupted schedule The pharmacokinetics of OSI-774 and its O-demethylated metabolite, OSI-420, were characterized RESULTS: Forty patients received a total of 123 28-day courses of OSI-774 No severe toxicities precluded dose escalation of OSI-774 from 25 to 100 mg/d in pa

995 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The development of the MMP inhibitors, like that of other targeted and predominantly antiproliferative compounds, poses a challenge because the paradigms that have governed the design of clinical oncology trials may be relevant to this new class of agents.
Abstract: The matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-dependent proteinases involved in the degradation of the extracellular matrix. The MMPs have been implicated in the processes of tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis; are frequently overexpressed in malignant tumors; and have been associated with an aggressive malignant phenotype and adverse prognosis in patients with cancer. A number of MMP inhibitors are being developed for the treatment of cancer. The most extensively studied class of MMP inhibitors includes collagen peptidomimetics and nonpeptidomimetic inhibitors of the MMP active site, tetracycline derivatives, and bisphosphonates. The hydroxamate peptidomimetic inhibitor batimastat and its orally bioavailable analogue marimastat, which bind covalently to the zinc atom at the MMP-active site, were the first MMP inhibitors to be studied in detail. Marimastat is currently being studied in randomized clinical trials. The nonpeptidic MMP inhibitors were synthesized in an attempt to improve the oral bioavailability and pharmaceutical properties of the peptidic inhibitors. Several members of this class of compounds are undergoing evaluation in phase III clinical trials. The tetracyclines and, particularly, the nonantibiotic chemically modified tetracyclines, interfere with several aspects of MMP expression and activation and inhibit tumor growth and metastases in preclinical models. A representative agent of this class, Col-3, is currently undergoing phase I clinical trials. The development of the MMP inhibitors, like that of other targeted and predominantly antiproliferative compounds, poses a challenge because the paradigms that have governed the design of clinical oncology trials may not be relevant to this new class of agents. The anticipated need for long-term administration of these drugs, together with their cytostatic mechanism of action, will require novel clinical trial design strategies.

774 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current and potential applications of metabolomics are reviewed, focusing on its use as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic evaluation.
Abstract: Metabolomics, an omic science in systems biology, is the global quantitative assessment of endogenous metabolites within a biological system. Either individually or grouped as a metabolomic profile, detection of metabolites is carried out in cells, tissues, or biofluids by either nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy or mass spectrometry. There is potential for the metabolome to have a multitude of uses in oncology, including the early detection and diagnosis of cancer and as both a predictive and pharmacodynamic marker of drug effect. Despite this, there is lack of knowledge in the oncology community regarding metabolomics and confusion about its methodologic processes, technical challenges, and clinical applications. Metabolomics, when used as a translational research tool, can provide a link between the laboratory and clinic, particularly because metabolic and molecular imaging technologies, such as positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, enable the discrimination of metabolic markers noninvasively in vivo. Here, we review the current and potential applications of metabolomics, focusing on its use as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic evaluation.

687 citations


Authors

Showing all 70 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Patricia A. Ganz12070157204
Lawrence H. Einhorn10156538536
David Thomas8884730583
William Matsui6218415192
S. Gail Eckhardt5923215426
Thomas E. Yankeelov502608559
Jeanne Kowalski411688120
Kyle M. Miller37696722
John Virostko1955994
David A. Hormuth1743766
Erin E. Hahn15441010
Carla L. Van Den Berg1521646
Ruth Rechis1429968
Angela M. Jarrett1237447
Sarah R. Arvey1118421
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

83% related

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
65.3K papers, 4.4M citations

83% related

Institut Gustave Roussy
20.7K papers, 1M citations

81% related

German Cancer Research Center
26.3K papers, 1.4M citations

81% related

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
30.9K papers, 2.2M citations

81% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20221
20214
20202
201910
20186
20176