scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Lund University

EducationLund, Sweden
About: Lund University is a education organization based out in Lund, Sweden. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 42345 authors who have published 124676 publications receiving 5016438 citations. The organization is also known as: Lunds Universitet & University of Lund.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that genomic-length DNA molecules imaged in nanochannels have an extension along the channel that scales linearly with the contour length of the polymer, in agreement with the scaling arguments developed by de Gennes for self-avoiding confined polymers.
Abstract: We show that genomic-length DNA molecules imaged in nanochannels have an extension along the channel that scales linearly with the contour length of the polymer, in agreement with the scaling arguments developed by de Gennes for self-avoiding confined polymers. This fundamental relationship allows us to measure directly the contour length of single DNA molecules confined in the channels, and the statistical analysis of the dynamics of the polymer in the nanochannel allows us to compute the SD of the mean of the extension. This statistical analysis allows us to measure the extension of λ DNA multimers with a 130-nm SD in 1 min.

515 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a review of membrane emulsification is presented, focusing mainly on investigations of process parameters such as, membrane type, average pore size and porosity, crossflow velocity, transmembrane pressure and emulsifier, with average droplet sizes ranging between 2 and 10 times the nominal pore diameter.

515 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Low level laser therapy with the suggested dose range significantly reduces pain and improves health status in chronic joint disorders, but the heterogeneity in patient samples, treatment procedures and trial design calls for cautious interpretation of the results.
Abstract: We investigated if low level laser therapy (LLLT) of the joint capsule can reduce pain in chronic joint disorders. A literature search identified 88 randomised controlled trials, of which 20 trials included patients with chronic joint disorders. Six trials were excluded for not irradiating the joint capsule. Three trials used doses lower than a dose range nominated a priori for reducing inflammation in the joint capsule. These trials found no significant difference between active and placebo treatments. The remaining 11 trials including 565 patients were of acceptable methodological quality with an average PEDro score of 6.9 (range 5–9). In these trials, LLLT within the suggested dose range was administered to the knee, temporomandibular or zygapophyseal joints. The results showed a mean weighted difference in change of pain on VAS of 29.8 mm (95% CI, 18.9 to 40.7) in favour of the active LLLT groups. Global health status improved for more patients in the active LLLT groups (relative risk of 0.52; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.76). Low level laser therapy with the suggested dose range significantly reduces pain and improves health status in chronic joint disorders, but the heterogeneity in patient samples, treatment procedures and trial design calls for cautious interpretation of the results.

514 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Nasim Mavaddat1, Daniel Barrowdale1, Irene L. Andrulis2, Susan M. Domchek3, Diana Eccles4, Heli Nevanlinna5, Susan J. Ramus6, Amanda B. Spurdle7, Mark E. Robson8, Mark E. Sherman9, Anna Marie Mulligan2, Fergus J. Couch10, Christoph Engel11, Lesley McGuffog1, Sue Healey7, Olga M. Sinilnikova12, Melissa C. Southey13, Mary Beth Terry8, David E. Goldgar14, Frances P. O'Malley2, Esther M. John15, Ramunas Janavicius16, Laima Tihomirova17, Thomas Hansen18, Finn Cilius Nielsen18, Ana Osorio, Alexandra V. Stavropoulou, Javier Benitez19, Siranoush Manoukian, Bernard Peissel, Monica Barile, Sara Volorio, Barbara Pasini20, Riccardo Dolcetti, Anna Laura Putignano21, Laura Ottini22, Paolo Radice, Ute Hamann23, Muhammad Usman Rashid24, Frans B. L. Hogervorst, Mieke Kriege25, Rob B. van der Luijt26, Susan Peock1, Debra Frost1, D. Gareth Evans, Carole Brewer27, Lisa Walker28, Mark T. Rogers29, Lucy Side30, C. E. Houghton, Jo Ellen Weaver31, Andrew K. Godwin32, Rita K. Schmutzler33, Barbara Wappenschmidt33, Alfons Meindl34, Karin Kast35, Norbert Arnold36, Dieter Niederacher37, Christian Sutter38, Helmut Deissler39, Doroteha Gadzicki40, Sabine Preisler-Adams41, Raymonda Varon-Mateeva42, Ines Schönbuchner43, Heidrun Gevensleben, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet44, Muriel Belotti, Laure Barjhoux12, Claudine Isaacs45, Beth N. Peshkin45, Trinidad Caldés19, Miguel De Al Hoya, Carmen Cañadas, Tuomas Heikkinen5, Päivi Heikkilä5, Kristiina Aittomäki5, Ignacio Blanco, Conxi Lázaro, Joan Brunet, Bjarni A. Agnarsson, Adalgeir Arason, Rosa B. Barkardottir, Martine Dumont46, Jacques Simard46, Marco Montagna, Simona Agata, Emma D'Andrea47, Max Yan, Stephen B. Fox48, Timothy R. Rebbeck, Wendy S. Rubinstein49, Nadine Tung, Judy Garber50, Xianshu Wang10, Zachary S. Fredericksen10, Vernon S. Pankratz10, Noralane M. Lindor10, Csilla Szabo51, Kenneth Offit8, Rita A. Sakr8, Mia M. Gaudet52, Christian F. Singer53, Muy Kheng Tea53, Christine Rappaport53, Phuong L. Mai9, Mark H. Greene9, Anna P. Sokolenko, Evgeny N. Imyanitov, Amanda E. Toland54, Leigha Senter54, Kevin Sweet54, Mads Thomassen55, Anne-Marie Gerdes18, Torben A Kruse55, Maria A. Caligo56, Paolo Aretini56, Johanna Rantala57, Anna Von Wachenfeld57, Karin M. Henriksson58, Linda Steele59, Susan L. Neuhausen59, Robert L. Nussbaum60, Mary S. Beattie60, Kunle Odunsi61, Lara Sucheston61, Simon A. Gayther6, Katherine L. Nathanson3, Jenny Gross62, Christine Walsh62, Beth Y. Karlan62, Georgia Chenevix-Trench7, Douglas F. Easton1, Antonis C. Antoniou1 
University of Cambridge1, University of Toronto2, University of Pennsylvania3, University of Southampton4, University of Helsinki5, University of Southern California6, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute7, Columbia University8, National Institutes of Health9, Mayo Clinic10, Leipzig University11, Claude Bernard University Lyon 112, University of Melbourne13, University of Utah14, Cancer Prevention Institute of California15, Vilnius University16, University of Latvia17, University of Copenhagen18, Complutense University of Madrid19, University of Turin20, University of Florence21, Sapienza University of Rome22, German Cancer Research Center23, Memorial Hospital of South Bend24, Erasmus University Rotterdam25, Utrecht University26, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital27, Churchill Hospital28, University Hospital of Wales29, University College London30, Fox Chase Cancer Center31, University of Kansas32, University of Cologne33, Technische Universität München34, Dresden University of Technology35, University of Kiel36, University of Düsseldorf37, Heidelberg University38, University of Ulm39, Hannover Medical School40, University of Münster41, Charité42, University of Würzburg43, University of Paris44, Georgetown University45, Laval University46, University of Padua47, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre48, University of Chicago49, Harvard University50, University of Delaware51, American Cancer Society52, Medical University of Vienna53, Ohio State University54, University of Southern Denmark55, University of Pisa56, Karolinska Institutet57, Lund University58, City of Hope National Medical Center59, University of California, San Francisco60, Roswell Park Cancer Institute61, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center62
TL;DR: Pathologic characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCa2 tumors may be useful for improving risk-prediction algorithms and informing clinical strategies for screening and prophylaxis.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Previously, small studies have found that BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast tumors differ in their pathology. Analysis of larger datasets of mutation carriers should allow further tumor characterization.METHODS: We used data from 4,325 BRCA1 and 2,568 BRCA2 mutation carriers to analyze the pathology of invasive breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancers.RESULTS: There was strong evidence that the proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast tumors decreased with age at diagnosis among BRCA1 (P-trend = 1.2 × 10(-5)), but increased with age at diagnosis among BRCA2, carriers (P-trend = 6.8 × 10(-6)). The proportion of triple-negative tumors decreased with age at diagnosis in BRCA1 carriers but increased with age at diagnosis of BRCA2 carriers. In both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, ER-negative tumors were of higher histologic grade than ER-positive tumors (grade 3 vs. grade 1; P = 1.2 × 10(-13) for BRCA1 and P = 0.001 for BRCA2). ER and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were independently associated with mutation carrier status [ER-positive odds ratio (OR) for BRCA2 = 9.4, 95% CI: 7.0-12.6 and PR-positive OR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.3-2.3, under joint analysis]. Lobular tumors were more likely to be BRCA2-related (OR for BRCA2 = 3.3, 95% CI: 2.4-4.4; P = 4.4 × 10(-14)), and medullary tumors BRCA1-related (OR for BRCA2 = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.18-0.35; P = 2.3 × 10(-15)). ER-status of the first breast cancer was predictive of ER-status of asynchronous contralateral breast cancer (P = 0.0004 for BRCA1; P = 0.002 for BRCA2). There were no significant differences in ovarian cancer morphology between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers (serous: 67%; mucinous: 1%; endometrioid: 12%; clear-cell: 2%).Conclusions/Impact: Pathologic characteristics of BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumors may be useful for improving risk-prediction algorithms and informing clinical strategies for screening and prophylaxis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1-14. ©2011 AACR.

514 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors quantified, across four countries of contrasting climatic and soil conditions in Europe, how differences in soil food web composition resulting from land use systems (intensive wheat rotation, extensive rotation, and permanent grassland) influence the functioning of soils and the ecosystem services that they deliver.
Abstract: Intensive land use reduces the diversity and abundance of many soil biota, with consequences for the processes that they govern and the ecosystem services that these processes underpin. Relationships between soil biota and ecosystem processes have mostly been found in laboratory experiments and rarely are found in the field. Here, we quantified, across four countries of contrasting climatic and soil conditions in Europe, how differences in soil food web composition resulting from land use systems (intensive wheat rotation, extensive rotation, and permanent grassland) influence the functioning of soils and the ecosystem services that they deliver. Intensive wheat rotation consistently reduced the biomass of all components of the soil food web across all countries. Soil food web properties strongly and consistently predicted processes of C and N cycling across land use systems and geographic locations, and they were a better predictor of these processes than land use. Processes of carbon loss increased with soil food web properties that correlated with soil C content, such as earthworm biomass and fungal/bacterial energy channel ratio, and were greatest in permanent grassland. In contrast, processes of N cycling were explained by soil food web properties independent of land use, such as arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacterial channel biomass. Our quantification of the contribution of soil organisms to processes of C and N cycling across land use systems and geographic locations shows that soil biota need to be included in C and N cycling models and highlights the need to map and conserve soil biodiversity across the world.

514 citations


Authors

Showing all 42777 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Yi Chen2174342293080
Fred H. Gage216967185732
Kari Stefansson206794174819
Mark I. McCarthy2001028187898
Ruedi Aebersold182879141881
Jie Zhang1784857221720
Feng Zhang1721278181865
Martin G. Larson171620117708
Michael Snyder169840130225
Unnur Thorsteinsdottir167444121009
Anders Björklund16576984268
Carl W. Cotman165809105323
Dennis R. Burton16468390959
Jaakko Kaprio1631532126320
Panos Deloukas162410154018
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
176.5K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

McGill University
162.5K papers, 6.9M citations

93% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

Imperial College London
209.1K papers, 9.3M citations

93% related

University of British Columbia
209.6K papers, 9.2M citations

93% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023246
2022698
20216,295
20206,032
20195,584
20185,249