scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Maastricht University

EducationMaastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
About: Maastricht University is a education organization based out in Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 19263 authors who have published 53291 publications receiving 2266866 citations. The organization is also known as: Universiteit Maastricht & UM.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The data suggest that high potency marijuana consistently impairs executive function and motor control and use of higher doses of THC in controlled studies may offer a reliable indication of THC induced impairment as compared to lower doses that have traditionally been used in performance studies.

349 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article summarizes the discussion of the dedicated Task Force during the first Conference of Consensus on Arterial Stiffness held in June 2000 (Paris, France) and analyses methods and devices used worldwide to evaluate the arterial stiffness.

349 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first multidisciplinary consensus conference about cancer of the colon and rectum was held in December 2012 as mentioned in this paper, where the expert panel consisted of representatives of European scientific organisations involved in cancer care of patients with colon and Rectal cancer and representatives of national colorectal registries.

348 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is suggested that automatic approach tendencies in response to appetitive stimuli could play a role in the etiology of addictive behaviors and related disorders.
Abstract: This study investigated whether automatic approach action tendencies for alcohol-related stimuli were associated with variation in the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1), previously related to rewarding effects of alcohol and craving. An adapted approach avoidance task was used, in which participants pulled or pushed a joystick in reaction to the format of a picture shown on the computer screen (e.g. pull landscape pictures and push portrait pictures). Picture size on the screen changed upon joystick movement, so that upon a pull movement picture size increased (creating a sense of approach) and upon a push movement picture size decreased (avoidance). Participants reacted to four categories of pictures: alcohol-related, other appetitive, general positive and general negative. The sample consisted of 84 heavy drinking young men without a g-allele in the A118G (or A355G) single nucleotide polymorphism of the OPRM1 gene and 24 heavy drinking young men with at least one g-allele. Heavy drinking carriers of a g-allele showed relatively strong automatic approach tendencies for alcohol (approach bias). Unexpectedly, they also showed an approach bias for other appetitive stimuli. No approach bias was found for general positive or negative stimuli. These results suggest that automatic approach tendencies in response to appetitive stimuli could play a role in the etiology of addictive behaviors and related disorders. Further research is needed to investigate the specificity of this approach bias and possible gender differences.

348 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Despite the diminishing effectiveness of SCS over time, 95% of patients with an implant would repeat the treatment for the same result, and results similar to those following PT for pain relief and all other measured variables at 5 years posttreatment.
Abstract: Object Chronic complex regional pain syndrome–Type I (CRPS-I) is a painful, disabling disorder for which no treatment with proven effect is available. In the present randomized controlled trial, the authors assessed the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in reducing pain due to CRPS-I at the 5-year follow-up. Methods The authors performed a randomized trial in a 2:1 ratio in which 36 patients with CRPS-I were allocated to receive SCS and physical therapy (PT) and 18 patients to receive PT alone. Twenty-four patients who received SCS+PT also underwent placement of a permanent spinal cord stimulator after successful test stimulation; the remaining 12 patients did not receive a permanent stimulator. The authors assessed pain intensity, global perceived effect, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life. Patients were examined before randomization, before implantation, and every year until 5 years thereafter. Ten patients were excluded from the final analysis. Results At 5 years po...

348 citations


Authors

Showing all 19492 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Edward Giovannucci2061671179875
Julie E. Buring186950132967
Aaron R. Folsom1811118134044
John J.V. McMurray1781389184502
Alvaro Pascual-Leone16596998251
Lex M. Bouter158767103034
David T. Felson153861133514
Walter Paulus14980986252
Michael Conlon O'Donovan142736118857
Randy L. Buckner141346110354
Philip Scheltens1401175107312
Anne Tjønneland139134591556
Ewout W. Steyerberg139122684896
James G. Herman138410120628
Andrew Steptoe137100373431
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Pittsburgh
201K papers, 9.6M citations

94% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

93% related

Utrecht University
139.3K papers, 6.2M citations

93% related

Emory University
122.4K papers, 6M citations

93% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023107
2022344
20214,522
20203,881
20193,367
20183,019