scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Marche Polytechnic University

EducationAncona, Italy
About: Marche Polytechnic University is a education organization based out in Ancona, Italy. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Prostate cancer. The organization has 5905 authors who have published 15769 publications receiving 382286 citations. The organization is also known as: Universitá Politecnica delle Marche & Universita Politecnica delle Marche.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The role of PD- 1/PD-L1 in RCC is discussed, focusing on the biological rationale, current clinical studies and promising therapeutic perspectives to target the PD-1 pathway.

160 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of low-toxicity chemical alternatives evaluated for control of postharvest diseases of temperate, subtropical and tropical fruit, and fruit-like vegetables is presented in this article.

160 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Pancreatic cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up S. Cascinu, M. Falconi, V. Valentini & S. Jelic.

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2016-Stroke
TL;DR: In patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage, higher neutrophils, lower lymphocytes, and higher NLRs predicted worse 3-month outcome, while the NLR resulted the best discriminating variable and the best predictive cut-off value was 4.58.
Abstract: Background and Purpose— Increasing evidence suggests that inflammatory mechanisms are involved in the intracerebral hemorrhage–induced brain injury. We evaluated the prognostic role of the peripheral leukocyte counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods— Patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage were retrospectively identified. Total white blood cells, absolute neutrophil count, and absolute lymphocyte count were obtained and the NLR computed from the admission blood work. The study end point was the occurrence of death or major disability at 3 months. Results— One hundred seventy-seven subjects were enrolled. Ninety-four (53.1%) had unfavorable outcome. The absolute neutrophil count, absolute lymphocyte count, and NLR were independently associated with the 3-month status. The NLR resulted the best discriminating variable and the best predictive cut-off value was 4.58. Conclusions— In patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage, higher neutrophils, lower lymphocytes, and higher NLRs predicted worse 3-month outcome.

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Puay Hoon Tan1, Liang Cheng2, Nathalie Rioux-Leclercq, Maria J. Merino3, George J. Netto4, Victor E. Reuter5, Steven S. Shen6, David J. Grignon2, Rodolfo Montironi7, Lars Egevad8, John R. Srigley9, Brett Delahunt10, Holger Moch11, Anila Abraham, Adebowale J. Adeniran, Khalid Ahmed, Hikmat Al Ahmadie, Ferran Algaba, Robert W. Allan, Mahul B. Amin, Pedram Argani, Ulrika Axcrona, Marc Barry, Dilek Ertoy Baydar, Louis R. Bégin, Daniel M. Berney, Peter Bethwaite, Athanase Billis, Ruth Birbe, Stephen M. Bonsib, David G. Bostwick, Fadi Brimo, Helen P. Cathro, Ying-Bei Chen, John C. Cheville, Yong Mee Cho, Ai Ying Chuang, Cynthia Cohen, Henry Crist, Warick Delprado, Fang Ming Deng, Jonathan I. Epstein, Andrew Evans, Oluwole Fadare, Daniel A. Fajardo, Sara M. Falzarano, Samson W. Fine, Stewart Fleming, Eddie Fridman, Bungo Furusato, Masoud Ganji, Masoumeh Ghayouri, Giovanna A. Giannico, Neriman Gokden, David J. Griffiths, Nilesh S. Gupta, Omar Hameed, Ondrej Hes, Michelle S. Hirsch, Jiaoti Huang, Wei Huang, Christina Hulsbergen Van De Kaa, Peter A. Humphrey, Sundus Hussein, Kenneth A. Iczkowski, Rafael E. Jimenez, Edward C. Jones, Laura Irene Jufe, James G. Kench, Masatoshi Kida, Glen Kristiansen, Lakshmi P. Kunju, Zhaoli Lane, Mathieu Latour, Claudio Lewin, Kathrine Lie, Josep Lloreta, Barbara Loftus, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Fiona Maclean, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Guido Martignoni, Teresa McHale, Jesse K. McKenney, Rose Miller, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Hedwig Murphy, John N. Nacey, Tipu Nazeer, Gabriella Nesi, Peter W. Nichols, Marie O'Donnell, Semra Olgac, Roberto Orozco, Adeboye O. Osunkoya, Aysim Ozagari, Chin Chen Pan, Anil V. Parwani, Joanna Perry-Keene, Constantina Petraki, Maria M. Picken, Maria Pyda-Karwicka, Katayoon Rezaei, Brian D. Robinson, Stephen Rohan, Ruben Ronchetti, Laurie Russell, Hemamali Samaratunga, Marina Scarpelli, Ahmed Shabaik, Rajal B. Shah, Jonathan H Shanks, Maria Shevchuk, Mathilde Sibony, Bhuvana Srinivasan, Martin Susani, Sueli Suzigan, Joan Sweet, Hiroyuki Takahashi, Pheroze Tamboli, Satish K. Tickoo, Isabel Trias, Kiril Trpkov, Larry True, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Funda Vakar-Lopez, Theo H. van der Kwast, Cheng Wang, Anne Y. Warren, Jorge L. Yao, Asli Yilmaz, Jin Zhao, Ming Zhou, Debra L. Zynger 
TL;DR: The role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and assessment of prognosis of renal tumors is addressed and the use of immunohistochemical markers and the approach to specific differential diagnostic scenarios is focused upon.
Abstract: The International Society of Urological Pathology convened a consensus conference on renal cancer, preceded by an online survey, to address issues relating to the diagnosis and reporting of renal neoplasia. In this report, the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis and assessment of prognosis of renal tumors is addressed. In particular we focused upon the use of immunohistochemical markers and the approach to specific differential diagnostic scenarios. We enquired whether cytogenetic and molecular tools were applied in practice and asked for views on the perceived prognostic role of biomarkers. Both the survey and conference voting results demonstrated a high degree of consensus in participants' responses regarding prognostic/predictive markers and molecular techniques, whereas it was apparent that biomarkers for these purposes remained outside the diagnostic realm pending clinical validation. Although no individual antibody or panel of antibodies reached consensus for classifying renal tumors, or for confirming renal metastatic disease, it was noted from the online survey that 87% of respondents used immunohistochemistry to subtype renal tumors sometimes or occasionally, and a majority (87%) used immunohistochemical markers (Pax 2 or Pax 8, renal cell carcinoma [RCC] marker, panel of pan-CK, CK7, vimentin, and CD10) in confirming the diagnosis of metastatic RCC. There was consensus that immunohistochemistry should be used for histologic subtyping and applied before reaching a diagnosis of unclassified RCC. At the conference, there was consensus that TFE3 and TFEB analysis ought to be requested when RCC was diagnosed in a young patient or when histologic appearances were suggestive of the translocation subtype; whereas Pax 2 and/or Pax 8 were considered to be the most useful markers in the diagnosis of a renal primary.

159 citations


Authors

Showing all 6013 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jonathan I. Epstein138112180975
Antoni Ribas13266099227
Francesco Fiori128103276699
Claudio Franceschi12085659868
Robert E. Coleman10372449796
Carmine Zoccali9981336774
Massimo Falconi9466741966
Mario Plebani91132943055
Roberto Danovaro8441523735
Rodolfo Montironi8395830957
Diego Centonze8146322857
Saverio Cinti7825632760
Michele Brignole7639926758
Jürgen P. Rabe7639120174
Jean-Jacques Body7038419608
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Florence
79.5K papers, 2.3M citations

95% related

University of Bologna
115.1K papers, 3.4M citations

95% related

University of Padua
114.8K papers, 3.6M citations

94% related

Sapienza University of Rome
155.4K papers, 4.3M citations

94% related

University of Pisa
73.1K papers, 2.1M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202376
2022181
20211,353
20201,390
20191,289
20181,148