Institution
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Healthcare•New York, New York, United States•
About: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is a healthcare organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 30293 authors who have published 65381 publications receiving 4462534 citations. The organization is also known as: MSKCC & New York Cancer Hospital.
Topics: Cancer, Population, Breast cancer, Radiation therapy, Prostate cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: As compared with interferon alfa, temsirolimus improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis.
Abstract: Background Interferon alfa is widely used for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma but has limited efficacy and tolerability. Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, may benefit patients with this disease. Methods In this multicenter, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 626 patients with previously untreated, poor-prognosis metastatic renal-cell carcinoma to receive 25 mg of intravenous temsirolimus weekly, 3 million U of interferon alfa (with an increase to 18 million U) subcutaneously three times weekly, or combination therapy with 15 mg of temsirolimus weekly plus 6 million U of interferon alfa three times weekly. The primary end point was overall survival in comparisons of the temsirolimus group and the combination-therapy group with the interferon group. Results Patients who received temsirolimus alone had longer overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.92; P=0.008) and progression-free survival (P<0.001) than did patie...
3,474 citations
••
TL;DR: It is suggested that reporting discrimination and calibration will always be important for a prediction model and decision-analytic measures should be reported if the predictive model is to be used for clinical decisions.
Abstract: The performance of prediction models can be assessed using a variety of methods and metrics. Traditional measures for binary and survival outcomes include the Brier score to indicate overall model performance, the concordance (or c) statistic for discriminative ability (or area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve), and goodness-of-fit statistics for calibration.Several new measures have recently been proposed that can be seen as refinements of discrimination measures, including variants of the c statistic for survival, reclassification tables, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). Moreover, decision-analytic measures have been proposed, including decision curves to plot the net benefit achieved by making decisions based on model predictions.We aimed to define the role of these relatively novel approaches in the evaluation of the performance of prediction models. For illustration, we present a case study of predicting the presence of residual tumor versus benign tissue in patients with testicular cancer (n = 544 for model development, n = 273 for external validation).We suggest that reporting discrimination and calibration will always be important for a prediction model. Decision-analytic measures should be reported if the predictive model is to be used for clinical decisions. Other measures of performance may be warranted in specific applications, such as reclassification metrics to gain insight into the value of adding a novel predictor to an established model.
3,473 citations
••
TL;DR: Suggestions include additional cutoffs for tumor size, with tumors >7 cm moving from T2 to T3; reassigning the category given to additional pulmonary nodules in some locations; and reclassifying pleural effusion as an M descriptor.
3,466 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide clarification and correction to their article "Genetic Basis for Clinical Response to CTLA-4 Blockade in Melanoma" (Dec. 4, 2014, issue).
Abstract: To the Editor: We are writing to provide clarification and correction to our article “Genetic Basis for Clinical Response to CTLA-4 Blockade in Melanoma” (Dec. 4, 2014, issue).1 Along with the publication, additional information on the data and methods that we used were posted in an online Supplementary Appendix, available with the full text of the article at NEJM.org. Some readers were confused by our incomplete description of part of the data analysis and our use of the term “validation set.” We acknowledge that our use of “validation set” was not appropriate in the context of the search for a . . .
3,451 citations
••
TL;DR: There is a need for clearly defined and widely applicable clinical criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit from hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer and studies of preoperative staging techniques or of adjuvant therapies should consider using such a score for stratification of patients.
Abstract: ObjectiveThere is a need for clearly defined and widely applicable clinical criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit from hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. Such criteria would also be useful for stratification of patients in clinical trials for this disease.MethodsCli
3,441 citations
Authors
Showing all 30708 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Gordon H. Guyatt | 231 | 1620 | 228631 |
Edward Giovannucci | 206 | 1671 | 179875 |
Irving L. Weissman | 201 | 1141 | 172504 |
Craig B. Thompson | 195 | 557 | 173172 |
Joan Massagué | 189 | 408 | 149951 |
Gad Getz | 189 | 520 | 247560 |
Chris Sander | 178 | 713 | 233287 |
Richard B. Lipton | 176 | 2110 | 140776 |
Richard K. Wilson | 173 | 463 | 260000 |
George P. Chrousos | 169 | 1612 | 120752 |
Stephen J. Elledge | 162 | 406 | 112878 |
Murray F. Brennan | 161 | 925 | 97087 |
Lewis L. Lanier | 159 | 554 | 86677 |
David W. Bates | 159 | 1239 | 116698 |
Dan R. Littman | 157 | 426 | 107164 |