Institution
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Healthcare•New York, New York, United States•
About: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is a healthcare organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 30293 authors who have published 65381 publications receiving 4462534 citations. The organization is also known as: MSKCC & New York Cancer Hospital.
Topics: Cancer, Population, Breast cancer, Prostate cancer, Radiation therapy
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre1, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center2, Institut Gustave Roussy3, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust4, Netherlands Cancer Institute5, University of Zurich6, University of California, Los Angeles7, University Health Network8, University of Tübingen9, University of Manchester10, Saint Louis University11, University of Pittsburgh12, Vanderbilt University13, Harvard University14, Genentech15, Hoffmann-La Roche16, University of Kiel17
TL;DR: An extended follow-up analysis of the total population and in the BRAF(V600E) and BRAF (V600K) mutation subgroups is presented, finding that overall survival and progression-free survival was significantly longer in the vemurafenib group than in the dacarbazine group.
Abstract: Summary Background In the BRIM-3 trial, vemurafenib was associated with risk reduction versus dacarbazine of both death and progression in patients with advanced BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. We present an extended follow-up analysis of the total population and in the BRAF V600E and BRAF V600K mutation subgroups. Methods Patients older than 18 years, with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma and whose tumour tissue was positive for BRAF V600 mutations were eligible. Patients also had to have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned by interactive voice recognition system to receive either vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m 2 of body surface area intravenously every 3 weeks). Coprimary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (n=675), with data censored at crossover. A sensitivity analysis was done. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01006980. Findings 675 eligible patients were enrolled from 104 centres in 12 countries between Jan 4, 2010, and Dec 16, 2010. 337 patients were randomly assigned to receive vemurafenib and 338 to receive dacarbazine. Median follow-up was 12·5 months (IQR 7·7–16·0) on vemurafenib and 9·5 months (3·1–14·7) on dacarbazine. 83 (25%) of the 338 patients initially randomly assigned to dacarbazine crossed over from dacarbazine to vemurafenib. Median overall survival was significantly longer in the vemurafenib group than in the dacarbazine group (13·6 months [95% CI 12·0–15·2] vs 9·7 months [7·9–12·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·57–0·87]; p=0·0008), as was median progression-free survival (6·9 months [95% CI 6·1–7·0] vs 1·6 months [1·6–2·1]; HR 0·38 [95% CI 0·32–0·46]; p BRAF V600E disease, median overall survival in the vemurafenib group was 13·3 months (95% CI 11·9–14·9) compared with 10·0 months (8·0–14·0) in the dacarbazine group (HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60–0·93]; p=0·0085); median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 6·2–7·0) and 1·6 months (1·6–2·1), respectively (HR 0·39 [95% CI 0·33–0·47]; p BRAF V600K disease, median overall survival in the vemurafenib group was 14·5 months (95% CI 11·2–not estimable) compared with 7·6 months (6·1–16·6) in the dacarbazine group (HR 0·43 [95% CI 0·21–0·90]; p=0·024); median progression-free survival was 5·9 months (95% CI 4·4–9·0) and 1·7 months (1·4–2·9), respectively (HR 0·30 [95% CI 0·16–0·56]; p Interpretation Inhibition of BRAF with vemurafenib improves survival in patients with the most common BRAF V600E mutation and in patients with the less common BRAF V600K mutation. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche-Genentech.
819 citations
••
Washington University in St. Louis1, Northwestern University2, Mayo Clinic3, University of Pisa4, University of Melbourne5, Harvard University6, Stanford University7, Cornell University8, University of Nebraska Medical Center9, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center10, University of New Mexico11, University of Pennsylvania12, Tulane University13, National Institutes of Health14, United States Department of Veterans Affairs15
TL;DR: Overall, 52 patients with lymphoproliferative disorders, 2 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, 1 patient with rheumatoid arthritis,1 patient with an idiopathic autoimmune pancytopenia, and 1 patientwith immune thrombocytopenIA developed PML after treatment with rituximab and other agents from 1997 to 2008.
818 citations
••
Brigham and Women's Hospital1, Queen Mary University of London2, Institut Gustave Roussy3, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León4, Washington University in St. Louis5, University of Pavia6, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center7, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital8, University of Colorado Denver9, Niigata University10, University of Tübingen11, Bristol-Myers Squibb12, Exelixis13, National Institutes of Health14, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center15
TL;DR: Nivolumab plus cabozantinib had significant benefits over sunitinib with respect to progression-free survival, overall survival, and likelihood of response in patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma.
Abstract: Background The efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus cabozantinib as compared with those of sunitinib in the treatment of previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma are not known. ...
816 citations
••
TL;DR: The pathways of ceramide generation and the interaction of Ceramide with caspases and other apoptotic signaling cascades are discussed.
Abstract: Ceramide is a sphingosine-based lipid signaling molecule that regulates cellular differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis. The emerging picture suggests that coupling of ceramide to specific signaling cascades is both stimulus and cell-type specific. Ceramide action is determined within the context of other stimuli and by the subcellular topology of its production. Here, we discuss the pathways of ceramide generation and the interaction of ceramide with caspases and other apoptotic signaling cascades.
813 citations
••
TL;DR: The framework and guidance is provided to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics, and the scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image-based definition of patient anatomy.
Abstract: In recent years, the sophistication and complexity of clinical treatment planning and treatment planning systems has increased significantly, particularly including three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning systems, and the use of conformal treatment planning and delivery techniques. This has led to the need for a comprehensive set of quality assurance (QA) guidelines that can be applied to clinical treatment planning. This document is the report of Task Group 53 of the Radiation Therapy Committee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. The purpose of this report is to guide and assist the clinical medical physicist in developing and implementing a comprehensive but viable program of quality assurance for modern radiotherapy treatment planning. The scope of the QA needs for treatment planning is quite broad, encompassing image-based definition of patient anatomy, 3D beam descriptions for complex beams including multileaf collimator apertures, 3D dose calculation algorithms, and complex plan evaluation tools including dose volume histograms. The Task Group recommends an organizational framework for the task of creating a QA program which is individualized to the needs of each institution and addresses the issues of acceptance testing, commissioning the planning system and planning process, routine quality assurance, and ongoing QA of the planning process. This report, while not prescribing specific QA tests, provides the framework and guidance to allow radiation oncology physicists to design comprehensive and practical treatment planning QA programs for their clinics.
812 citations
Authors
Showing all 30708 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Gordon H. Guyatt | 231 | 1620 | 228631 |
Edward Giovannucci | 206 | 1671 | 179875 |
Irving L. Weissman | 201 | 1141 | 172504 |
Craig B. Thompson | 195 | 557 | 173172 |
Joan Massagué | 189 | 408 | 149951 |
Gad Getz | 189 | 520 | 247560 |
Chris Sander | 178 | 713 | 233287 |
Richard B. Lipton | 176 | 2110 | 140776 |
Richard K. Wilson | 173 | 463 | 260000 |
George P. Chrousos | 169 | 1612 | 120752 |
Stephen J. Elledge | 162 | 406 | 112878 |
Murray F. Brennan | 161 | 925 | 97087 |
Lewis L. Lanier | 159 | 554 | 86677 |
David W. Bates | 159 | 1239 | 116698 |
Dan R. Littman | 157 | 426 | 107164 |