scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

HealthcareNew York, New York, United States
About: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is a healthcare organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Cancer & Population. The organization has 30293 authors who have published 65381 publications receiving 4462534 citations. The organization is also known as: MSKCC & New York Cancer Hospital.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a set of recommendations specifically aimed at subsolid nodules, which are based on the original Fleischner Society guidelines for incidentally detected solid nodules.
Abstract: This report is to complement the original Fleischner Society recommendations for incidentally detected solid nodules by proposing a set of recommendations specifically aimed at subsolid nodules. The development of a standardized approach to the interpretation and management of subsolid nodules remains critically important given that peripheral adenocarcinomas represent the most common type of lung cancer, with evidence of increasing frequency. Following an initial consideration of appropriate terminology to describe subsolid nodules and a brief review of the new classification system for peripheral lung adenocarcinomas sponsored by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and European Respiratory Society (ERS), six specific recommendations were made, three with regard to solitary subsolid nodules and three with regard to multiple subsolid nodules. Each recommendation is followed first by the rationales underlying the recommendation and then by specific pertinent remarks. Finally, issues for which future research is needed are discussed. The recommendations are the result of careful review of the literature now available regarding subsolid nodules. Given the complexity of these lesions, the current recommendations are more varied than the original Fleischner Society guidelines for solid nodules. It cannot be overemphasized that these guidelines must be interpreted in light of an individual's clinical history. Given the frequency with which subsolid nodules are encountered in daily clinical practice, and notwithstanding continuing controversy on many of these issues, it is anticipated that further refinements and modifications to these recommendations will be forthcoming as information continues to emerge from ongoing research.

788 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The capacity of IFN gamma and lymphocytes to not only provide protection against tumor development but also to sculpt the immunogenic phenotype of tumors that develop in an immunocompetent host is presented and introduced as a "cancer immunoediting" process.

788 citations

Journal Article
TL;DR: It is shown that coadministration of ZD1839, as with anti-EGFR, will enhance the efficacy of cytotoxic agents against human vulvar (A431), lung (A549 and SK-LC-16 NSCL and LX-1), and prostate (PC-3 and TSU-PR1) tumors, and potentiated most cytot toxic agents in combination treatment against all of these tumors, irrespective of EGFR status.
Abstract: The blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) function with monoclonal antibodies has major antiproliferative effects against human tumors in vivo. Similar antiproliferative effects against some of these same tumors have also been observed with specific inhibitors of the EGFR-associated tyrosine kinase. One such inhibitor, the p.o. active ZD1839 (Iressa), has pronounced antiproliferative activity against human tumor xenografts. We now show that coadministration of ZD1839, as with anti-EGFR, will enhance the efficacy of cytotoxic agents against human vulvar (A431), lung (A549 and SK-LC-16 NSCL and LX-1), and prostate (PC-3 and TSU-PR1) tumors. Oral ZD1839 (five times daily x 2) and cytotoxic agents (i.p. every 3-4 days x 4) were given for a period of 2 weeks to mice with well-established tumors. On this schedule, the maximum tolerated dose (150 mg/kg) of ZD1839 induced partial regression of A431, a tumor that expresses high levels of EGFR, 70-80% inhibition among tumors with low but highly variable levels of EGFR expression (A549, SKLC-16, TSU-PR1, and PC-3), and 50-55% inhibition against the LX-1 tumor, which expresses very low levels of EGFR. ZD1839 was very effective in potentiating most cytotoxic agents in combination treatment against all of these tumors, irrespective of EGFR status, but dose reduction of ZD1839 below its single-agent maximum tolerated dose was required for optimum tolerance. The pronounced growth inhibitory action of the platinums, cisplatin and carboplatinum, as single agents against A431 vulvar, A549 and LX-1 lung, and TSU-PR1 and PC-3 prostate tumors was increased several-fold when ZD1839 was added, with some regression of A431 and PC-3 tumors. Although the taxanes, paclitaxel or docetaxel, as single agents markedly inhibited the growth of A431, LX-1, SK-LC-16, TSU-PR1, and PC-3, when combined with ZD1839, partial or complete regression was usually seen. Against A549, the growth inhibition of doxorubicin was increased 10-fold (>99%) with ZD1839. The folate analogue, edatrexate, was highly growth inhibitory against A549, LX-1, and TSU-PR1, whereas edatrexate combined with ZD1839 resulted in partial or complete regression in these tumors. Against the A431 tumor, paclitaxel alone either was highly growth inhibitory or induced some regression, but when combined with ZD1839, pronounced regression was obtained. Combination with gemcitabine neither added nor detracted from baseline cytotoxic efficacy, whereas ZD1839 combined with vinorelbine was poorly tolerated. Overall, these results suggest that potentiation of cytotoxic treatment with ZD1839 does not require high levels of EGFR expression in the target tumors. They also suggest significant clinical benefit from ZD1839 in combination with a variety of widely used cytotoxic agents.

787 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A user-friendly nomogram is developed that uses information commonly available to the surgeon to easily and accurately calculate the likelihood of having additional, non-SLN metastases for an individual patient.
Abstract: Background:The standard of care for breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases includes complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). However, many question the need for complete ALND in every patient with detectable SLN metastases, particularly those perceived to have a low risk of non-SLN metastases. Accurate estimates of the likelihood of additional disease in the axilla could assist greatly in decision-making regarding further treatment.

784 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The primary outcome was safety and tolerability, assessed in all treated patients, and data from the latter two cohorts, which were considered potentially suitable for further clinical development, are presented.
Abstract: Summary Background Nivolumab has shown improved survival in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. We assessed the safety and activity of combination nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy for NSCLC. Methods The open-label, phase 1, multicohort study (CheckMate 012) cohorts reported here were enrolled at eight US academic centres. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed recurrent stage IIIb or stage IV, chemotherapy-naive NSCLC. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by an interactive voice response system to receive nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 12 weeks, or nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal of consent. Data from the latter two cohorts, which were considered potentially suitable for further clinical development, are presented in this report; data from the other cohort (as well as several earlier cohorts) are described in the appendix. The primary outcome was safety and tolerability, assessed in all treated patients. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01454102. Findings Between May 15, 2014, and March 25, 2015, 78 patients were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab every 12 weeks (n=38) or nivolumab every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab every 6 weeks (n=40). One patient in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort was excluded before treatment; therefore 77 patients actually received treatment (38 in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort; 39 in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort). At data cut-off on Jan 7, 2016, 29 (76%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 32 (82%) in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort had discontinued treatment. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 14 (37%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 13 (33%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort; the most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased lipase (three [8%] and no patients), pneumonitis (two [5%] and one [3%] patients), adrenal insufficiency (one [3%] and two [5%] patients), and colitis (one [3%] and two [5%] patients). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 12 (32%) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 11 (28%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort. Treatment-related adverse events (any grade) prompted treatment discontinuation in four (11%) patients in the every-12-weeks cohort and five (13%) patients in the every-6-weeks cohort. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Confirmed objective responses were achieved in 18 (47% [95% CI 31–64]) patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 15 (38% [95% CI 23–55]) patients in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort; median duration of response was not reached in either cohort, with median follow-up times of 12·8 months (IQR 9·3–15·5) in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 11·8 months (6·7–15·9) in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort. In patients with PD-L1 of 1% or greater, confirmed objective responses were achieved in 12 (57%) of 21 patients in the ipilimumab every-12-weeks cohort and 13 (57%) of 23 patients in the ipilimumab every-6-weeks cohort. Interpretation In NSCLC, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab had a tolerable safety profile and showed encouraging clinical activity characterised by a high response rate and durable response. To our knowledge, the results of this study are the first suggestion of improved benefit compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy in patients with NSCLC, supporting further assessment of this combination in a phase 3 study. Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb.

784 citations


Authors

Showing all 30708 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Gordon H. Guyatt2311620228631
Edward Giovannucci2061671179875
Irving L. Weissman2011141172504
Craig B. Thompson195557173172
Joan Massagué189408149951
Gad Getz189520247560
Chris Sander178713233287
Richard B. Lipton1762110140776
Richard K. Wilson173463260000
George P. Chrousos1691612120752
Stephen J. Elledge162406112878
Murray F. Brennan16192597087
Lewis L. Lanier15955486677
David W. Bates1591239116698
Dan R. Littman157426107164
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
92.5K papers, 4.7M citations

99% related

Mayo Clinic
169.5K papers, 8.1M citations

95% related

Brigham and Women's Hospital
110.5K papers, 6.8M citations

95% related

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
75.2K papers, 4.4M citations

95% related

University of California, San Francisco
186.2K papers, 12M citations

94% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023163
2022413
20214,330
20204,389
20194,156
20183,686