scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Mendoza College of Business

About: Mendoza College of Business is a based out in . It is known for research contribution in the topics: Earnings & Stock (geology). The organization has 188 authors who have published 765 publications receiving 54677 citations. The organization is also known as: Mendoza College of Business.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the ultimate ownership and control of 5,232 corporations in 13 Western European countries were analyzed, and the majority of firms were either widely held (36.93%) or family controlled (44.29%).

2,934 citations

Posted Content
TL;DR: This article developed an alternative negative word list, along with five other word lists, that better reflect tone in financial text and linked the word lists to 10 K filing returns, trading volume, return volatility, fraud, material weakness, and unexpected earnings.
Abstract: Previous research uses negative word counts to measure the tone of a text. We show that word lists developed for other disciplines misclassify common words in financial text. In a large sample of 10 Ks during 1994 to 2008, almost three-fourths of the words identified as negative by the widely used Harvard Dictionary are words typically not considered negative in financial contexts. We develop an alternative negative word list, along with five other word lists, that better reflect tone in financial text. We link the word lists to 10 K filing returns, trading volume, return volatility, fraud, material weakness, and unexpected earnings.

2,638 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The first new effect size index is described is a residual-based index that quantifies the amount of variance explained in both the mediator and the outcome and the second new effectsize index quantifying the indirect effect as the proportion of the maximum possible indirect effect that could have been obtained, given the scales of the variables involved.
Abstract: The statistical analysis of mediation effects has become an indispensable tool for helping scientists investigate processes thought to be causal. Yet, in spite of many recent advances in the estimation and testing of mediation effects, little attention has been given to methods for communicating effect size and the practical importance of those effect sizes. Our goals in this article are to (a) outline some general desiderata for effect size measures, (b) describe current methods of expressing effect size and practical importance for mediation, (c) use the desiderata to evaluate these methods, and (d) develop new methods to communicate effect size in the context of mediation analysis. The first new effect size index we describe is a residual-based index that quantifies the amount of variance explained in both the mediator and the outcome. The second new effect size index quantifies the indirect effect as the proportion of the maximum possible indirect effect that could have been obtained, given the scales of the variables involved. We supplement our discussion by offering easy-to-use R tools for the numerical and visual communication of effect size for mediation effects.

2,359 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors address the endogeneity of free trade agreements using instrumental-variable (IV) techniques, control function (CF) techniques and panel-data techniques; IV and CF approaches do not adjust for endogeneity well, but a panel data approach does.

2,163 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: An extended deterrence theory model is presented that combines work from criminology, social psychology, and information systems and suggests that user awareness of security countermeasures directly influences the perceived certainty and severity of organizational sanctions associated with IS misuse, which leads to reduced IS misuse intention.
Abstract: Intentional insider misuse of information systems resources (i.e., IS misuse) represents a significant threat to organizations. For example, industry statistics suggest that between 50%--75% of security incidents originate from within an organization. Because of the large number of misuse incidents, it has become important to understand how to reduce such behavior. General deterrence theory suggests that certain controls can serve as deterrent mechanisms by increasing the perceived threat of punishment for IS misuse. This paper presents an extended deterrence theory model that combines work from criminology, social psychology, and information systems. The model posits that user awareness of security countermeasures directly influences the perceived certainty and severity of organizational sanctions associated with IS misuse, which leads to reduced IS misuse intention. The model is then tested on 269 computer users from eight different companies. The results suggest that three practices deter IS misuse: user awareness of security policies; security education, training, and awareness (SETA) programs; and computer monitoring. The results also suggest that perceived severity of sanctions is more effective in reducing IS misuse than certainty of sanctions. Further, there is evidence that the impact of sanction perceptions vary based on one's level of morality. Implications for the research and practice of IS security are discussed.

1,070 citations


Authors

Showing all 188 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Timothy A. Judge11321270640
Dean A. Shepherd9430036740
Luis R. Gomez-Mejia6418524783
Alok Kumar5517013187
Martijn Cremers4813710673
Tim Loughran479722983
Mark C. Bolino427411019
Paul Schultz41808593
Mara Faccio417119125
Patrick E. Murphy391127087
Robert Audi382106108
John F. Sherry389611289
Ken Kelley36807381
Robert P. Vecchio35755085
Rajiv Kohli33887837
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Max M. Fisher College of Business
1.3K papers, 147.4K citations

90% related

INSEAD
4.8K papers, 369.4K citations

90% related

London Business School
5.1K papers, 437.9K citations

88% related

Stockholm School of Economics
4.8K papers, 285.5K citations

85% related

HEC Montréal
5.7K papers, 196.8K citations

84% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
20221
202181
202050
201946
201834
201738