scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Michigan State University

EducationEast Lansing, Michigan, United States
About: Michigan State University is a education organization based out in East Lansing, Michigan, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 60109 authors who have published 137074 publications receiving 5633022 citations. The organization is also known as: MSU & Michigan State.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify an agreed-upon definition of engagement, investigate its uniqueness, and clarify its nomological network of constructs using a conceptual framework based on Macey and Schneider (2008).
Abstract: Many researchers have concerns about work engagement's distinction from other constructs and its theoretical merit. The goals of this study were to identify an agreed-upon definition of engagement, to investigate its uniqueness, and to clarify its nomological network of constructs. Using a conceptual framework based on Macey and Schneider (2008; Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3–30), we found that engagement exhibits discriminant validity from, and criterion related validity over, job attitudes. We also found that engagement is related to several key antecedents and consequences. Finally, we used meta-analytic path modeling to test the role of engagement as a mediator of the relation between distal antecedents and job performance, finding support for our conceptual framework. In sum, our results suggest that work engagement is a useful construct that deserves further attention.

2,170 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Christopher J L Murray1, Jerry Puthenpurakal Abraham2, Mohammed K. Ali3, Miriam Alvarado1, Charles Atkinson1, Larry M. Baddour4, David Bartels5, Emelia J. Benjamin6, Kavi Bhalla5, Gretchen L. Birbeck7, Ian Bolliger1, Roy Burstein1, Emily Carnahan1, Honglei Chen8, David Chou1, Sumeet S. Chugh9, Aaron Cohen10, K. Ellicott Colson1, Leslie T. Cooper11, William G. Couser12, Michael H. Criqui13, Kaustubh Dabhadkar3, Nabila Dahodwala14, Goodarz Danaei5, Robert P. Dellavalle15, Don C. Des Jarlais16, Daniel Dicker1, Eric L. Ding5, E. Ray Dorsey17, Herbert C. Duber1, Beth E. Ebel12, Rebecca E. Engell1, Majid Ezzati18, David T. Felson6, Mariel M. Finucane5, Seth Flaxman19, Abraham D. Flaxman1, Thomas D. Fleming1, Mohammad H. Forouzanfar1, Greg Freedman1, Michael Freeman1, Sherine E. Gabriel4, Emmanuela Gakidou1, Richard F. Gillum20, Diego Gonzalez-Medina1, Richard A. Gosselin21, Bridget F. Grant8, Hialy R. Gutierrez22, Holly Hagan23, Rasmus Havmoeller24, Rasmus Havmoeller9, Howard J. Hoffman8, Kathryn H. Jacobsen25, Spencer L. James1, Rashmi Jasrasaria1, Sudha Jayaraman5, Nicole E. Johns1, Nicholas J Kassebaum12, Shahab Khatibzadeh5, Lisa M. Knowlton5, Qing Lan, Janet L Leasher26, Stephen S Lim1, John K Lin5, Steven E. Lipshultz27, Stephanie J. London8, Rafael Lozano, Yuan Lu5, Michael F. Macintyre1, Leslie Mallinger1, Mary M. McDermott28, Michele Meltzer29, George A. Mensah8, Catherine Michaud30, Ted R. Miller31, Charles Mock12, Terrie E. Moffitt32, Ali A. Mokdad1, Ali H. Mokdad1, Andrew E. Moran22, Dariush Mozaffarian5, Dariush Mozaffarian33, Tasha B. Murphy1, Mohsen Naghavi1, K.M. Venkat Narayan3, Robert G. Nelson8, Casey Olives12, Saad B. Omer3, Katrina F Ortblad1, Bart Ostro34, Pamela M. Pelizzari35, David Phillips1, C. Arden Pope36, Murugesan Raju37, Dharani Ranganathan1, Homie Razavi, Beate Ritz38, Frederick P. Rivara12, Thomas Roberts1, Ralph L. Sacco27, Joshua A. Salomon5, Uchechukwu K.A. Sampson39, Ella Sanman1, Amir Sapkota40, David C. Schwebel41, Saeid Shahraz42, Kenji Shibuya43, Rupak Shivakoti17, Donald H. Silberberg14, Gitanjali M Singh5, David Singh44, Jasvinder A. Singh41, David A. Sleet, Kyle Steenland3, Mohammad Tavakkoli5, Jennifer A. Taylor45, George D. Thurston23, Jeffrey A. Towbin46, Monica S. Vavilala12, Theo Vos1, Gregory R. Wagner47, Martin A. Weinstock48, Marc G. Weisskopf5, James D. Wilkinson27, Sarah Wulf1, Azadeh Zabetian3, Alan D. Lopez49 
14 Aug 2013-JAMA
TL;DR: To measure the burden of diseases, injuries, and leading risk factors in the United States from 1990 to 2010 and to compare these measurements with those of the 34 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), systematic analysis of descriptive epidemiology was used.
Abstract: Importance Understanding the major health problems in the United States and how they are changing over time is critical for informing national health policy. Objectives To measure the burden of diseases, injuries, and leading risk factors in the United States from 1990 to 2010 and to compare these measurements with those of the 34 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Design We used the systematic analysis of descriptive epidemiology of 291 diseases and injuries, 1160 sequelae of these diseases and injuries, and 67 risk factors or clusters of risk factors from 1990 to 2010 for 187 countries developed for the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study to describe the health status of the United States and to compare US health outcomes with those of 34 OECD countries. Years of life lost due to premature mortality (YLLs) were computed by multiplying the number of deaths at each age by a reference life expectancy at that age. Years lived with disability (YLDs) were calculated by multiplying prevalence (based on systematic reviews) by the disability weight (based on population-based surveys) for each sequela; disability in this study refers to any short- or long-term loss of health. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were estimated as the sum of YLDs and YLLs. Deaths and DALYs related to risk factors were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of exposure data and relative risks for risk-outcome pairs. Healthy life expectancy (HALE) was used to summarize overall population health, accounting for both length of life and levels of ill health experienced at different ages. Results US life expectancy for both sexes combined increased from 75.2 years in 1990 to 78.2 years in 2010; during the same period, HALE increased from 65.8 years to 68.1 years. The diseases and injuries with the largest number of YLLs in 2010 were ischemic heart disease, lung cancer, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and road injury. Age-standardized YLL rates increased for Alzheimer disease, drug use disorders, chronic kidney disease, kidney cancer, and falls. The diseases with the largest number of YLDs in 2010 were low back pain, major depressive disorder, other musculoskeletal disorders, neck pain, and anxiety disorders. As the US population has aged, YLDs have comprised a larger share of DALYs than have YLLs. The leading risk factors related to DALYs were dietary risks, tobacco smoking, high body mass index, high blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose, physical inactivity, and alcohol use. Among 34 OECD countries between 1990 and 2010, the US rank for the age-standardized death rate changed from 18th to 27th, for the age-standardized YLL rate from 23rd to 28th, for the age-standardized YLD rate from 5th to 6th, for life expectancy at birth from 20th to 27th, and for HALE from 14th to 26th. Conclusions and Relevance From 1990 to 2010, the United States made substantial progress in improving health. Life expectancy at birth and HALE increased, all-cause death rates at all ages decreased, and age-specific rates of years lived with disability remained stable. However, morbidity and chronic disability now account for nearly half of the US health burden, and improvements in population health in the United States have not kept pace with advances in population health in other wealthy nations.

2,159 citations

Book
03 Jun 1998
TL;DR: This paper defines Content Analysis as a Social Science Tool as a social science tool and designs a content analysis system based on data collected in this study.
Abstract: Contents: Preface. Introduction. Defining Content Analysis as a Social Science Tool. Designing a Content Analysis. Measurement. Sampling. Reliability. Validity. Data Analysis. Computers.

2,131 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II), previously described by Maidak et al. (2000), continued during the past year to add new rRNA sequences to the aligned data and to improve the analysis commands.
Abstract: The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) is a curated database that offers ribosome-related data, analysis services and associated computer programs. The offerings include phylogenetically ordered alignments of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences, derived phylogenetic trees, rRNA secondary structure diagrams, and various software for handling, analyzing and displaying alignments and trees. The data are available via anonymous FTP (rdp.life.uiuc.edu), electronic mail (server@rdp.life.uiuc.edu), gopher (rdpgopher.life.uiuc.edu) and WWW (http://rdpwww.life.uiuc.edu/ ). The electronic mail and WWW servers provide ribosomal probe checking, approximate phylogenetic placement of user-submitted sequences, screening for possible chimeric rRNA sequences, automated alignment, and a suggested placement of an unknown sequence on an existing phylogenetic tree.

2,106 citations


Authors

Showing all 60636 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
David Miller2032573204840
Anil K. Jain1831016192151
D. M. Strom1763167194314
Feng Zhang1721278181865
Derek R. Lovley16858295315
Donald G. Truhlar1651518157965
Donald E. Ingber164610100682
J. E. Brau1621949157675
Murray F. Brennan16192597087
Peter B. Reich159790110377
Wei Li1581855124748
Timothy C. Beers156934102581
Claude Bouchard1531076115307
Mercouri G. Kanatzidis1521854113022
James J. Collins15166989476
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of California, Davis
180K papers, 8M citations

97% related

University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

97% related

University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

97% related

University of Wisconsin-Madison
237.5K papers, 11.8M citations

97% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

97% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023250
2022752
20217,041
20206,870
20196,548
20185,779