Institution
Michigan State University
Education•East Lansing, Michigan, United States•
About: Michigan State University is a education organization based out in East Lansing, Michigan, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 60109 authors who have published 137074 publications receiving 5633022 citations. The organization is also known as: MSU & Michigan State.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors suggest that collaborating with customers and suppliers is a first step toward effective collaboration within the firm, and that this relationship may be the key to helping managers understand how best to facilitate behavioral change.
Abstract: Collaboration with external supply chain entities influences increased internal collaboration, which in turn improves service performance. This relationship may be the key to helping managers understand how best to facilitate behavioral change. The implication is that collaborating with customers and suppliers is a first step toward effective collaboration within the firm.
1,040 citations
••
TL;DR: ABF swimmers represent the first demonstration of microscopic artificial swimmers that use helical propulsion and are of interest in fundamental research and for biomedical applications.
Abstract: Inspired by the natural design of bacterial flagella, we report artificial bacterial flagella (ABF) that have a comparable shape and size to their organic counterparts and can swim in a controllable fashion using weak applied magnetic fields. The helical swimmer consists of a helical tail resembling the dimensions of a natural flagellum and a thin soft-magnetic “head” on one end. The swimming locomotion of ABF is precisely controlled by three orthogonal electromagnetic coil pairs. Microsphere manipulation is performed, and the thrust force generated by an ABF is analyzed. ABF swimmers represent the first demonstration of microscopic artificial swimmers that use helical propulsion. Self-propelled devices such as these are of interest in fundamental research and for biomedical applications.
1,040 citations
••
TL;DR: An eight-item Internet self-efficacy scale developed for the present study was found to be reliable and internally consistent and a path analysis model was tested within the theoretical framework of social cognitive theory.
Abstract: Internet self-efficacy, or the belief in one's capabilities to organize and execute courses of Internet actions required to produce given attainments, is a potentially important factor in efforts to close the digital divide that separates experienced Internet users from novices. Prior research on Internet self-efficacy has been limited to examining specific task performance and narrow behavioral domains rather than overall attainments in relation to general Internet use, and has not yielded evidence of reliability and construct validity. Survey data were collected to develop a reliable operational measure of Internet self-efficacy and to examine its construct validity. An eight-item Internet self-efficacy scale developed for the present study was found to be reliable and internally consistent. Prior Internet experience, outcome expectancies and Internet use were significantly and positively correlated to Internet self-efficacy judgments. Internet stress and self-disparagement were negatively related to Internet self-efficacy. A path analysis model was tested within the theoretical framework of social cognitive theory (Bandura (1997).
1,039 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that many current approaches to technology integration in teaching are technocentric, often omitting sufficient consideration of the dynamic and complex relationships among content, technology, pedagogy, and context.
Abstract: In this paper we critically analyze extant approaches to technology integration in teaching, arguing that many current methods are technocentric, often omitting sufficient consideration of the dynamic and complex relationships among content, technology, pedagogy, and context. We recommend using the technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK) framework as a way to think about effective technology integration, recognizing technology, pedagogy, content and context as interdependent aspects of teachers’ knowledge necessary to teach content-based curricula effectively with educational technologies. We offer TPACK-based “activity types,” rooted in previous research about content-specific activity structures, as an alternative to existing professional development approaches and explain how this new way of thinking may authentically and successfully assist teachers’ and teacher educators’ technology integration efforts.
1,038 citations
••
National Institutes of Health1, University of Pittsburgh2, Bayer Corporation3, CHDI Foundation4, Cornell University5, Rockefeller University6, Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation7, University of Massachusetts Medical School8, University of Nebraska Medical Center9, American Medical Association10, Michigan State University11, University of Rochester12, University of Melbourne13, Stanford University14, American Association for the Advancement of Science15, Harvard University16, Hoffmann-La Roche17, University of California, Los Angeles18, University of Edinburgh19, University of California, San Francisco20, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Therapy Development Institute21, University of California, Irvine22, Food and Drug Administration23
TL;DR: The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data.
Abstract: The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress.
1,037 citations
Authors
Showing all 60636 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
David Miller | 203 | 2573 | 204840 |
Anil K. Jain | 183 | 1016 | 192151 |
D. M. Strom | 176 | 3167 | 194314 |
Feng Zhang | 172 | 1278 | 181865 |
Derek R. Lovley | 168 | 582 | 95315 |
Donald G. Truhlar | 165 | 1518 | 157965 |
Donald E. Ingber | 164 | 610 | 100682 |
J. E. Brau | 162 | 1949 | 157675 |
Murray F. Brennan | 161 | 925 | 97087 |
Peter B. Reich | 159 | 790 | 110377 |
Wei Li | 158 | 1855 | 124748 |
Timothy C. Beers | 156 | 934 | 102581 |
Claude Bouchard | 153 | 1076 | 115307 |
Mercouri G. Kanatzidis | 152 | 1854 | 113022 |
James J. Collins | 151 | 669 | 89476 |