Institution
Monash University
Education•Melbourne, Victoria, Australia•
About: Monash University is a education organization based out in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 35920 authors who have published 100681 publications receiving 3027002 citations.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: π-Conjugated polymers that are electrochemically cycled in ionic liquids have enhanced lifetimes without failure and fast cycle switching speeds and anions such as tetrafluoroborate or hexafluorophosphate showed negligible loss in electroactivity.
Abstract: π-Conjugated polymers that are electrochemically cycled in ionic liquids have enhanced lifetimes without failure (up to 1 million cycles) and fast cycle switching speeds (100 ms). We report results for electrochemical mechanical actuators, electrochromic windows, and numeric displays made from three types of π-conjugated polymers: polyaniline, polypyrrole, and polythiophene. Experiments were performed under ambient conditions, yet the polymers showed negligible loss in electroactivity. These performance advantages were obtained by using environmentally stable, room-temperature ionic liquids composed of 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium cations together with anions such as tetrafluoroborate or hexafluorophosphate.
1,092 citations
••
11 Aug 2016
TL;DR: PCOS can impact women’s reproductive health, leading to anovulatory infertility and higher rate of early pregnancy loss, and the risks of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and endometrial cancer among PCOS patients are significantly increased.
Abstract: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is characterized by a constellation of clinical symptoms that include irregular menses due to chronic oligo-ovulation, phenotypic features of hyperandrogenism, and obesity The term “polycystic ovary” refers to ovarian morphology with increased ovarian stroma and a ring of cortical follicles Core biochemical features include hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance The pathogenesis of PCOS remains a topic of debate Treatment of PCOS typically focuses on mitigating the impact of hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance, and chronic oligo-ovulation and restoring fertility when desired
1,089 citations
••
Monash University1, National Health and Medical Research Council2, University of New South Wales3, University of Pennsylvania4, Erasmus University Rotterdam5, Oulu University Hospital6, University of Adelaide7, Odense University Hospital8, State University of New York System9, Australian Catholic University10, University Medical Center Utrecht11, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences12, University of Chile13, university of lille14, Utrecht University15, Imperial College London16, University of Western Australia17, Karolinska Institutet18, University of Rochester19, Pennsylvania State University20, Peking University21, Cornell University22, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland23, University of Hong Kong24, Columbia University Medical Center25, Pennington Biomedical Research Center26, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic27, Deakin University28, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul29, Victoria University, Australia30, University of Helsinki31, Queen Mary University of London32, Taipei Medical University Hospital33, University of Cape Town34, Norwegian University of Science and Technology35, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia36, University of Colombo37, University of Pittsburgh38, Boston Children's Hospital39, Hacettepe University40
TL;DR: The international guideline for the assessment and management of PCOS provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice based on the best available evidence, expert multidisciplinary input and consumer preferences to promote consistent, evidence-based care and improve the experience and health outcomes of women with PCOS.
Abstract: Study Question What is the recommended assessment and management of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), based on the best available evidence, clinical expertise, and consumer preference? Summary Answer International evidence-based guidelines including 166 recommendations and practice points, addressed prioritized questions to promote consistent, evidence-based care and improve the experience and health outcomes of women with PCOS. What Is Known Already Previous guidelines either lacked rigorous evidence-based processes, did not engage consumer and international multidisciplinary perspectives, or were outdated. Diagnosis of PCOS remains controversial and assessment and management are inconsistent. The needs of women with PCOS are not being adequately met and evidence practice gaps persist. Study Design, Size, Duration International evidence-based guideline development engaged professional societies and consumer organizations with multidisciplinary experts and women with PCOS directly involved at all stages. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II-compliant processes were followed, with extensive evidence synthesis. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was applied across evidence quality, feasibility, acceptability, cost, implementation and ultimately recommendation strength. Participants/Materials, Setting, Methods Governance included a six continent international advisory and a project board, five guideline development groups, and consumer and translation committees. Extensive health professional and consumer engagement informed guideline scope and priorities. Engaged international society-nominated panels included pediatrics, endocrinology, gynecology, primary care, reproductive endocrinology, obstetrics, psychiatry, psychology, dietetics, exercise physiology, public health and other experts, alongside consumers, project management, evidence synthesis, and translation experts. Thirty-seven societies and organizations covering 71 countries engaged in the process. Twenty face-to-face meetings over 15 months addressed 60 prioritized clinical questions involving 40 systematic and 20 narrative reviews. Evidence-based recommendations were developed and approved via consensus voting within the five guideline panels, modified based on international feedback and peer review, with final recommendations approved across all panels. Main Results and the Role of Chance The evidence in the assessment and management of PCOS is generally of low to moderate quality. The guideline provides 31 evidence based recommendations, 59 clinical consensus recommendations and 76 clinical practice points all related to assessment and management of PCOS. Key changes in this guideline include: i) considerable refinement of individual diagnostic criteria with a focus on improving accuracy of diagnosis; ii) reducing unnecessary testing; iii) increasing focus on education, lifestyle modification, emotional wellbeing and quality of life; and iv) emphasizing evidence based medical therapy and cheaper and safer fertility management. Limitations, Reasons for Caution Overall evidence is generally low to moderate quality, requiring significantly greater research in this neglected, yet common condition, especially around refining specific diagnostic features in PCOS. Regional health system variation is acknowledged and a process for guideline and translation resource adaptation is provided. Wider Implications of the Findings The international guideline for the assessment and management of PCOS provides clinicians with clear advice on best practice based on the best available evidence, expert multidisciplinary input and consumer preferences. Research recommendations have been generated and a comprehensive multifaceted dissemination and translation program supports the guideline with an integrated evaluation program. Study Funding/Competing Interest(S) The guideline was primarily funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) supported by a partnership with ESHRE and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guideline development group members did not receive payment. Travel expenses were covered by the sponsoring organizations. Disclosures of conflicts of interest were declared at the outset and updated throughout the guideline process, aligned with NHMRC guideline processes. Full details of conflicts declared across the guideline development groups are available at https://www.monash.edu/medicine/sphpm/mchri/pcos/guideline in the Register of disclosures of interest. Of named authors, Dr Costello has declared shares in Virtus Health and past sponsorship from Merck Serono for conference presentations. Prof. Laven declared grants from Ferring, Euroscreen and personal fees from Ferring, Euroscreen, Danone and Titus Healthcare. Prof. Norman has declared a minor shareholder interest in an IVF unit. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The guideline was peer reviewed by special interest groups across our partner and collaborating societies and consumer organizations, was independently assessed against AGREEII criteria and underwent methodological review. This guideline was approved by all members of the guideline development groups and was submitted for final approval by the NHMRC.
1,088 citations
••
Emory University1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre3, Medical University of Lublin4, Charles University in Prague5, University of Navarra6, Rabin Medical Center7, Ankara University8, Monash University9, Queen Mary University of London10, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center11, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine12, Dresden University of Technology13, Bristol-Myers Squibb14, Harvard University15
TL;DR: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who received a combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone had a significant relative reduction of 30% in the risk of disease progression or death.
Abstract: BackgroundElotuzumab, an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody targeting signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 (SLAMF7), showed activity in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in a phase 1b–2 study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. MethodsIn this phase 3 study, we randomly assigned patients to receive either elotuzumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (elotuzumab group) or lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (control group). Coprimary end points were progression-free survival and the overall response rate. Final results for the coprimary end points are reported on the basis of a planned interim analysis of progression-free survival. ResultsOverall, 321 patients were assigned to the elotuzumab group and 325 to the control group. After a median follow-up of 24.5 months, the rate of progression-free survival at 1 year in the elotuzumab group was 68%, as compared with 57% in the control group; at 2 years, the rates were 41% and 27%, respectively. Median progressi...
1,083 citations
••
University of Lisbon1, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation2, Virginia Tech College of Natural Resources and Environment3, California Institute of Technology4, Wageningen University and Research Centre5, Cardiff University6, American Museum of Natural History7, BirdLife International8, University of British Columbia9, Food and Agriculture Organization10, Australian Museum11, Leibniz Association12, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds13, University of Maryland, College Park14, Yale University15, Stanford University16, Monash University17, Kyoto University18, Zoological Society of London19, United States Geological Survey20, University of Sussex21, United Nations Environment Programme22, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources23, Office of Environment and Heritage24
TL;DR: With the first plenary meeting of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) soon under way, partners are developing—and seeking consensus around—Essential Biod diversity Variables (EBVs) that could form the basis of monitoring programs worldwide.
Abstract: Reducing the rate of biodiversity loss and averting dangerous biodiversity change are international goals, reasserted by the Aichi Targets for 2020 by Parties to the United Nations (UN) Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) after failure to meet the 2010 target (1, 2). However, there is no global, harmonized observation system for delivering regular, timely data on biodiversity change (3). With the first plenary meeting of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) soon under way, partners from the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) (4) are developing—and seeking consensus around—Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) that could form the basis of monitoring programs worldwide.
1,074 citations
Authors
Showing all 36568 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Bert Vogelstein | 247 | 757 | 332094 |
Kenneth W. Kinzler | 215 | 640 | 243944 |
David J. Hunter | 213 | 1836 | 207050 |
David R. Williams | 178 | 2034 | 138789 |
Yang Yang | 171 | 2644 | 153049 |
Lei Jiang | 170 | 2244 | 135205 |
Dongyuan Zhao | 160 | 872 | 106451 |
Christopher J. O'Donnell | 159 | 869 | 126278 |
Leif Groop | 158 | 919 | 136056 |
Mark E. Cooper | 158 | 1463 | 124887 |
Theo Vos | 156 | 502 | 186409 |
Mark J. Smyth | 153 | 713 | 88783 |
Rinaldo Bellomo | 147 | 1714 | 120052 |
Detlef Weigel | 142 | 516 | 84670 |
Geoffrey Burnstock | 141 | 1488 | 99525 |