Institution
National University of Mar del Plata
Education•Mar del Plata, Argentina•
About: National University of Mar del Plata is a education organization based out in Mar del Plata, Argentina. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Ctenomys talarum. The organization has 3504 authors who have published 6361 publications receiving 93181 citations. The organization is also known as: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
Topics: Population, Ctenomys talarum, Intertidal zone, Holocene, Salt marsh
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
Columbia University1, University of Pittsburgh2, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health3, Stanford University4, German Cancer Research Center5, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich6, Yale University7, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center8, Dresden University of Technology9, Wistar Institute10, National University of Mar del Plata11, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio12, Guangzhou Medical University13, University of Connecticut Health Center14, Nagoya University15, New York University16, University of Arizona17
TL;DR: The mechanisms underlying ferroptosis are reviewed, connections to other areas of biology and medicine are highlighted, and tools and guidelines for studying this emerging form of regulated cell death are recommended.
3,356 citations
••
Grenoble Institute of Technology1, National University of Mar del Plata2, Case Western Reserve University3, University of Fribourg4, University of Nottingham5, Virginia Tech6, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna7, University of Leoben8, Kyoto University9, Oregon State University10, Portland State University11, Imperial College London12, Queen Mary University of London13
TL;DR: An overview of recent progress in the area of cellulose nanofibre-based nanocomposites is given in this article, with particular emphasis on applications, such as reinforced adhesives, to make optically transparent paper for electronic displays, to create DNA-hybrid materials, to generate hierarchical composites and for use in foams, aerogels and starch nanocom composites.
Abstract: This paper provides an overview of recent progress made in the area of cellulose nanofibre-based nanocomposites. An introduction into the methods used to isolate cellulose nanofibres (nanowhiskers, nanofibrils) is given, with details of their structure. Following this, the article is split into sections dealing with processing and characterisation of cellulose nanocomposites and new developments in the area, with particular emphasis on applications. The types of cellulose nanofibres covered are those extracted from plants by acid hydrolysis (nanowhiskers), mechanical treatment and those that occur naturally (tunicate nanowhiskers) or under culturing conditions (bacterial cellulose nanofibrils). Research highlighted in the article are the use of cellulose nanowhiskers for shape memory nanocomposites, analysis of the interfacial properties of cellulose nanowhisker and nanofibril-based composites using Raman spectroscopy, switchable interfaces that mimic sea cucumbers, polymerisation from the surface of cellulose nanowhiskers by atom transfer radical polymerisation and ring opening polymerisation, and methods to analyse the dispersion of nanowhiskers. The applications and new advances covered in this review are the use of cellulose nanofibres to reinforce adhesives, to make optically transparent paper for electronic displays, to create DNA-hybrid materials, to generate hierarchical composites and for use in foams, aerogels and starch nanocomposites and the use of all-cellulose nanocomposites for enhanced coupling between matrix and fibre. A comprehensive coverage of the literature is given and some suggestions on where the field is likely to advance in the future are discussed.
2,214 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the feasibility of extracting cellulose from sisal fiber, by means of two different procedures was carried out, including usual chemical procedures such as acid hydrolysis, chlorination, alkaline extraction, and bleaching.
Abstract: In this work a study on the feasibility of extracting cellulose from sisal fiber, by means of two different procedures was carried out. These processes included usual chemical procedures such as acid hydrolysis, chlorination, alkaline extraction, and bleaching. The final products were characterized by means of Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM). The extraction procedures that were used led to purified cellulose. Advantages and disadvantages of both procedures were also analyzed. Finally, nanocellulose was produced by the acid hydrolysis of obtained cellulose and characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).
1,186 citations
••
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz2, Sara Abdelfatah3, Mahmoud Abdellatif4 +2980 more•Institutions (777)
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
1,129 citations
••
Institut national de la recherche agronomique1, Broad Institute2, Wageningen University and Research Centre3, University of Salamanca4, University of Provence5, Utrecht University6, University of Nottingham7, SupAgro8, Kaiserslautern University of Technology9, University of Toronto10, La Trobe University11, University of Lyon12, Tel Aviv University13, National University of Mar del Plata14, Landcare Research15, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis16, University of Paris-Sud17, University of La Laguna18, University of Melbourne19, Agro ParisTech20, Andrés Bello National University21, University of Exeter22, Plant & Food Research23, Hebrew University of Jerusalem24, University of Florida25, Texas A&M University26
TL;DR: Comparative genome analysis revealed the basis of differing sexual mating compatibility systems between S. sclerotiorum and B. cinerea, and shed light on the evolutionary and mechanistic bases of the genetically complex traits of necrotrophic pathogenicity and sexual mating.
Abstract: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Botrytis cinerea are closely related necrotrophic plant pathogenic fungi notable for their wide host ranges and environmental persistence. These attributes have made these species models for understanding the complexity of necrotrophic, broad host-range pathogenicity. Despite their similarities, the two species differ in mating behaviour and the ability to produce asexual spores. We have sequenced the genomes of one strain of S. sclerotiorum and two strains of B. cinerea. The comparative analysis of these genomes relative to one another and to other sequenced fungal genomes is provided here. Their 38-39 Mb genomes include 11,860-14,270 predicted genes, which share 83% amino acid identity on average between the two species. We have mapped the S. sclerotiorum assembly to 16 chromosomes and found large-scale co-linearity with the B. cinerea genomes. Seven percent of the S. sclerotiorum genome comprises transposable elements compared to ,1% of B. cinerea. The arsenal of genes associated with necrotrophic processes is similar between the species, including genes involved in plant cell wall degradation and oxalic acid production. Analysis of secondary metabolism gene clusters revealed an expansion in number and diversity of B. cinerea-specific secondary metabolites relative to S. sclerotiorum. The potential diversity in secondary metabolism might be involved in adaptation to specific ecological niches. Comparative genome analysis revealed the basis of differing sexual mating compatibility systems between S. sclerotiorum and B. cinerea. The organization of the mating-type loci differs, and their structures provide evidence for the evolution of heterothallism from homothallism. These data shed light on the evolutionary and mechanistic bases of the genetically complex traits of necrotrophic pathogenicity and sexual mating. This resource should facilitate the functional studies designed to better understand what makes these fungi such successful and persistent pathogens of agronomic crops.
855 citations
Authors
Showing all 3539 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Jose Maria Kenny | 91 | 630 | 29865 |
Daniel E. Resasco | 80 | 370 | 23758 |
Victor O. Sadras | 65 | 281 | 12602 |
Martin Crespi | 61 | 197 | 11420 |
Lorenzo Lamattina | 59 | 156 | 13306 |
Fernando H. Andrade | 56 | 122 | 8156 |
Matthijs Tollenaar | 50 | 86 | 7860 |
Oscar Iribarne | 44 | 221 | 7664 |
Roberto J. J. Williams | 44 | 212 | 7536 |
Cecilia Gotor | 40 | 100 | 9483 |
Joseph C. Polacco | 39 | 77 | 3791 |
Mirta Ines Aranguren | 39 | 120 | 6919 |
Vera Alejandra Alvarez | 38 | 221 | 6410 |
R.L. Baldwin | 37 | 96 | 4006 |
Roberto Sanchez | 37 | 84 | 8973 |