Institution
New York City Fire Department
Government•New York, New York, United States•
About: New York City Fire Department is a government organization based out in New York, New York, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Poison control & Emergency medical services. The organization has 956 authors who have published 1099 publications receiving 25248 citations. The organization is also known as: The New York City Fire Department & FDNY.
Topics: Poison control, Emergency medical services, Population, Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, Resuscitation
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: Rapid defibrillation by nonmedical personnel using an automated external defibrillator can improve survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation.
Abstract: Background The use of automated external defibrillators by persons other than paramedics and emergency medical technicians is advocated by the American Heart Association and other organizations. However, there are few data on the outcomes when the devices are used by nonmedical personnel for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods We studied a prospective series of cases of sudden cardiac arrest in casinos. Casino security officers were instructed in the use of automated external defibrillators. The locations where the defibrillators were stored in the casinos were chosen to make possible a target interval of three minutes or less from collapse to the first defibrillation. Our protocol called for a defibrillation first (if feasible), followed by manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary outcome was survival to discharge from the hospital. Results Automated external defibrillators were used in 105 patients whose initial cardiac rhythm was ventricular fibrillation. Fifty-six of the patients (53 perc...
1,373 citations
••
TL;DR: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intravenous amiodarone in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest found no significant difference in the mean duration of the resuscitation attempt or the proportion of patients who required additional antiarrhythmic drugs after the administration of the study drug.
Abstract: Background Whether antiarrhythmic drugs improve the rate of successful resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has not been determined in randomized clinical trials. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intravenous amiodarone in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Patients who had cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation (or pulseless ventricular tachycardia) and who had not been resuscitated after receiving three or more precordial shocks were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of intravenous amiodarone (246 patients) or placebo (258 patients). Results The treatment groups had similar clinical profiles. There was no significant difference between the amiodarone and placebo groups in the mean (±SD) duration of the resuscitation attempt (42±16 and 43±16 minutes, respectively), the number of shocks delivered (4±3 and 6±5), or the proportion of patients who required additional antiarrhythmic drugs after the administration of the study drug (66...
741 citations
••
TL;DR: The routine provision of approximately 90 seconds of CPR prior to use of AED was associated with increased survival when response intervals were 4 minutes or longer, and among survivors, the proportion having favorable neurologic function at hospital discharge increased.
Abstract: ContextUse of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) by
first arriving emergency medical technicians (EMTs) is advocated to
improve the outcome for out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF).
However, adding AEDs to the emergency medical system in Seattle, Wash,
did not improve survival. Studies in animals have shown improved
outcomes when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was administered
prior to an initial shock for VF of several minutes' duration.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of providing 90 seconds of CPR
to persons with out-of-hospital VF prior to delivery of a shock by
first-arriving EMTs.DesignObservational, prospectively defined, population-based
study with 42 months of preintervention analysis (July 1, 1990-December
31, 1993) and 36 months of postintervention analysis (January 1,
1994-December 31, 1996).SettingSeattle fire department–based, 2-tiered emergency medical
system.ParticipantsA total of 639 patients treated for out-of-hospital
VF before the intervention and 478 after the intervention.InterventionModification of the protocol for use of AEDs,
emphasizing approximately 90 seconds of CPR prior to delivery of a
shock.Main Outcome MeasuresSurvival and neurologic status at hospital
discharge determined by retrospective chart review as a function of
early (<4 minutes) and later (≥4 minutes) response intervals.ResultsSurvival improved from 24% (155/639) to 30% (142/478)
(P=.04). That benefit was predominantly in
patients for whom the initial response interval was 4 minutes or longer
(survival, 17% [56/321] before vs 27% [60/220] after;
P = .01). In a multivariate logistic model, adjusting for
differences in patient and resuscitation factors between the periods,
the protocol intervention was estimated to improve survival
significantly (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.90;
P = .02). Overall, the proportion of victims who survived
with favorable neurologic recovery increased from 17% (106/634) to
23% (109/474) (P = .01). Among survivors, the proportion
having favorable neurologic function at hospital discharge increased
from 71% (106/150) to 79% (109/138) (P<.11).ConclusionThe routine provision of approximately 90 seconds of
CPR prior to use of AED was associated with increased survival when
response intervals were 4 minutes or longer.
730 citations
••
TL;DR: Automated external defibrillators deployed in readily accessible, well-marked public areas in Chicago airports were used effectively to assist patients with cardiac arrest, and most of the users had no duty to act and no prior training in the use of these devices.
Abstract: Background Automated external defibrillators save lives when they are used by designated personnel in certain public settings. We performed a two-year prospective study at three Chicago airports to assess whether random bystanders witnessing out-of-hospital cardiac arrests would retrieve and successfully use automated external defibrillators. Methods Defibrillators were installed a brisk 60-to-90-second walk apart throughout passenger terminals at O'Hare, Midway, and Meigs Field airports, which together serve more than 100 million passengers per year. The use of defibrillators was promoted by public-service videos in waiting areas, pamphlets, and reports in the media. We assessed the time from notification of the dispatchers to defibrillation, survival rate at 72 hours and at one year among persons with cardiac arrest, their neurologic status, and the characteristics of rescuers. Results Over a two-year period, 21 persons had nontraumatic cardiac arrest, 18 of whom had ventricular fibrillation. With two e...
707 citations
••
TL;DR: The overall survival rates for Chicago were significantly lower than those reported in most previous studies, all based on smaller communities; they were consistent with the rates reported in the one comparable study of a large city.
610 citations
Authors
Showing all 959 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Joseph P. Broderick | 130 | 504 | 72779 |
Michel Marre | 82 | 444 | 39052 |
Michael K. Copass | 68 | 128 | 16746 |
Charles B. Hall | 59 | 220 | 14128 |
Roger J. Lewis | 56 | 293 | 14437 |
Hillel W. Cohen | 54 | 241 | 10892 |
Michael R. Sayre | 52 | 167 | 11164 |
Frédéric Fumeron | 42 | 141 | 6490 |
David J. Prezant | 40 | 204 | 5764 |
Michael D. Weiden | 39 | 117 | 5525 |
Elizabeth T. Jacobs | 36 | 115 | 4528 |
Nerses Sanossian | 34 | 157 | 4251 |
Terence D. Valenzuela | 33 | 77 | 5091 |
Marc Eckstein | 31 | 117 | 3656 |
Mayris P. Webber | 31 | 103 | 3012 |