scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Nova Southeastern University

EducationFort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
About: Nova Southeastern University is a education organization based out in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Poison control. The organization has 6668 authors who have published 11018 publications receiving 344391 citations. The organization is also known as: Nova & NSU.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Aronson et al. as mentioned in this paper presented a pragmatic view of the thematic analysis of the interview transcripts, focusing on identifying identifiable themes and patterns of living and/or behavior in the interviews.
Abstract: Ethnographic interviews have become a commonly used qualitat ive methodology for collecting data (Aronson, 1992). Once the information is gathered, res earchers are faced with the decision on how to analyze the data. There are many ways to anal yze informants' talk about their experiences (Mahrer, 1988; Spradley, 1979; Taylor & Bogdan, 1984), a nd thematic analysis is one such way. Although thematic analysis has been described (Benner, 1985; Leininger, 1985; Taylor & Board, 1984), there is insufficient literature that outlines the pragmatic process of thematic analysis. This article attempts to outline the procedure for perform ing a thematic analysis. Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License. This article is available in The Qualitative Report: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol2/iss1/3 A Pragmatic View of Thematic Analysis by Jodi Aronson The Qualitative Report, Volume 2, Number 1, Spring, 1994 Ethnographic interviews have become a commonly used qualitative methodology for collecting data (Aronson, 1992). Once the information is gathered, researchers are faced with the decision on how to analyze the data. There are many ways to analyze informants' talk about their experiences (Mahrer, 1988; Spradley, 1979; Taylor & Bogdan, 1984), and thematic analysis is one such way. Although thematic analysis has been described (Benner, 1985; Leininger, 1985; Taylor & Board, 1984), there is insufficient literature that outlines the pragmatic process of thematic analysis. This article attempts to outline the procedure for performing a thematic analysis. Performing a Thematic Analysis The ethnographic interview is a commonly used interviewing process employed by researchclinicians (Kuehl & Newfield, 1991; Kuehl, Newfield & Joanning, 1990; Newfield, Joanning, Kuehl, & Quinn, 1990; Newfield, Kuehl, Joanning & Quinn, 1991; William, 1992). From the conversations that take place in a therapy session or those that are encouraged for the sake of researching a process, ideas emerge that can be better understood under the control of a thematic analysis. Thematic analysis focuses on identifiable themes and patterns of living and/or behavior. The first step is to collect the data. Audiotapes should be collected to study the talk of a session or of an enthnographic interview (Spradley, 1979). From the transcribed conversations, patterns of experiences can be listed. This can come from direct quotes or paraphrasing common ideas. The following is an example. A family was interviewed to get a better understanding of their experience with a juvenile justice system. The entire interview was transcribed. The first pattern of experience listed, was the process of the juvenile being arrested, and the different explanations from the various family members. The second pattern of experience listed was the attitude that each family member had toward the process (Aronson, 1992). The next step to a thematic analysis is to identify all data that relate to the already classified patterns. To continue the above example, the identified patterns are then expounded on. All of the talk that fits under the specific pattern is identified and placed with the corresponding pattern. For example, each family member somehow named their "attitude" while they were speaking. The father stated that he is "anti-statist," the mother said that she is "protective," and the son stated that "felt bad for what he had done" (Aronson, 1992). The next step to a thematic analysis is to combine and catalogue related patterns into sub-themes. Themes are defined as units derived from patterns such as "conversation topics, vocabulary, recurring activities, meanings, feelings, or folk sayings and proverbs" (Taylor & Bogdan, 1989, p.131). Themes are identified by "bringing together components or fragments of ideas or experiences, which often are meaningless when viewed alone" (Leininger, 1985, p. 60). Themes that emerge from the informants' stories are pieced together to form a comprehensive picture of their collective experience. The "coherence of ideas rests with the analyst who has rigorously studied how different ideas or components fit together in a meaningful way when linked together" (Leininger, 1985, p. 60). Constas (1992) reiterates this point and states that the "interpretative approach should be considered as a distinct point of origination" (p. 258). When gathering sub-themes to obtain a comprehensive view of the information, it is easy to see a pattern emerging. When patterns emerge it is best to obtain feedback from the informants about them. This can be done as the interview is taking place or by asking the informants to give feedback from the transcribed conversations. In the former, the interviewer uses the informants' feedback to establish the next questions in the interview. In the latter, the interviewer transcribes the interview or the session, and asks the informants to provide feedback that is then incorporated in the theme analysis. The next step is to build a valid argument for choosing the themes. This is done by reading the related literature. By referring back to the literature, the interviewer gains information that allows him or herself to make inferences from the interview or therapy session. Once the themes have been collected and the literature has been studied, the researcher is ready to formulate theme statements to develop a story line. When the literature is interwoven with the findings, the story that the interviewer constructs is one that stands with merit. A developed story line helps the reader to comprehend the process, understanding, and motivation of the interviewer. References Aronson, J. (1992). The interface of family therapy and a juvenile arbitration and mediation program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL. Benner, P. (1985). Quality of life: A phenomenological perspective on explanation, prediction, and understanding in nursing science. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(1), 1-14. Constas, M. A. (1992). Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 253-266. Kuehl, B. P., & Newfield, N. A. (1991). Family listeners among the Nacirema: Their curative ceremonies and how the natives view them. Family Therapy Case Studies, 6(1), 55-66. Kuehl, B. P., Newfield, N. A., & Joanning, H. (1990). Toward a client-based description of family therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 3(3), 310-321. Leininger, M. M. (1985). Ethnography and ethnonursing: Models and modes of qualitative data analysis. In M. M. Leininger (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in nursing (pp. 33-72). Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton. Mahrer, A. R. (1988). Discovery-oriented psychotherapy research. American Psychologist, 43(9), 694-702. Newfield, N. A., Kuehl, B. P., Joanning, H., & Quinn, W. H. (1990). A mini-ethnography of the family therapy of adolescent drug abuse: The ambiguous experience. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 7(2), 57-80. Newfield, N. A., Kuehl, B. P., Joanning, H., & Quinn, W. H. (1991). We can tell you about psychos and shrinks: An ethnography of the family therapy of adolescent substance abuse. In T. C. Todd & M. D. Selekman (Eds.), Family therapy approaches with adolescent substance abusers (pp. 277-310). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings. New York: John Wiley & Sons. William, J. L. (1992). Don't discuss it: Reconciling illness, dying, and death in a medical school anatomy laboratory. Family Systems Medicine, 10(1), 65-78. Jodi Aronson, Ph.D., LMFT is the Clinical Director of MCC Behavioral Care, 3313 West Commercial Boulevard, Suite 112, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309.

2,038 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the effective ways to conduct in-depth, qualitative interviews for novice investigators by employing a step-by-step process for implementation is discussed. But, the authors focus on the qualitative research design of the interview protocol, which can be complicated depending upon the level of experience a researcher may have with a particular type of methodology.
Abstract: Qualitative research design can be complicated depending upon the level of experience a researcher may have with a particular type of methodology. As researchers, many aspire to grow and expand their knowledge and experiences with qualitative design in order to better utilize diversified research paradigms for future investigations. One of the more popular areas of interest in qualitative research design is that of the interview protocol. Interviews provide in-depth information pertaining to participants’ experiences and viewpoints of a particular topic. Often times, interviews are coupled with other forms of data collection in order to provide the researcher with a well-rounded collection of information for analyses. This paper explores the effective ways to conduct in-depth, qualitative interviews for novice investigators by employing a step-by-step process for implementation. Key Words: Informal Conversational Interview, General Interview Guide, OpenEnded Interviews

2,008 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Seth Flaxman1, Rupert R A Bourne2, Serge Resnikoff3, Serge Resnikoff4, Peter Ackland5, Tasanee Braithwaite6, Maria V Cicinelli, Aditi Das7, Jost B. Jonas8, Jill E Keeffe9, John H. Kempen10, Janet L Leasher11, Hans Limburg, Kovin Naidoo3, Kovin Naidoo12, Konrad Pesudovs13, Alexander J Silvester, Gretchen A Stevens14, Nina Tahhan3, Nina Tahhan4, Tien Yin Wong15, Hugh R. Taylor16, Rupert R A Bourne2, Aries Arditi, Yaniv Barkana, Banu Bozkurt17, Alain M. Bron, Donald L. Budenz18, Feng Cai, Robert J Casson19, Usha Chakravarthy20, Jaewan Choi, Maria Vittoria Cicinelli, Nathan Congdon20, Reza Dana21, Rakhi Dandona22, Lalit Dandona23, Iva Dekaris, Monte A. Del Monte24, Jenny deva25, Laura E. Dreer26, Leon B. Ellwein27, Marcela Frazier26, Kevin D. Frick28, David S. Friedman28, João M. Furtado29, H. Gao30, Gus Gazzard31, Ronnie George32, Stephen Gichuhi33, Victor H. Gonzalez, Billy R. Hammond34, Mary Elizabeth Hartnett35, Minguang He16, James F. Hejtmancik, Flavio E. Hirai36, John J Huang37, April D. Ingram38, Jonathan C. Javitt28, Jost B. Jonas8, Charlotte E. Joslin39, John H Kempen10, Moncef Khairallah, Rohit C Khanna9, Judy E. Kim40, George N. Lambrou41, Van C. Lansingh, Paolo Lanzetta42, Jennifer I. Lim43, Kaweh Mansouri, Anu A. Mathew44, Alan R. Morse, Beatriz Munoz, David C. Musch24, Vinay Nangia, Maria Palaiou10, Maurizio Battaglia Parodi, Fernando Yaacov Pena, Tunde Peto20, Harry A. Quigley, Murugesan Raju45, Pradeep Y. Ramulu46, Zane Rankin15, Dana Reza21, Alan L. Robin23, Luca Rossetti47, Jinan B. Saaddine46, Mya Sandar15, Janet B. Serle48, Tueng T. Shen23, Rajesh K. Shetty49, Pamela C. Sieving27, Juan Carlos Silva50, Rita S. Sitorus51, Dwight Stambolian52, Gretchen Stevens14, Hugh Taylor16, Jaime Tejedor, James M. Tielsch28, Miltiadis K. Tsilimbaris53, Jan C. van Meurs, Rohit Varma54, Gianni Virgili55, Ya Xing Wang56, Ningli Wang56, Sheila K. West, Peter Wiedemann57, Tien Wong15, Richard Wormald6, Yingfeng Zheng15 
Imperial College London1, Anglia Ruskin University2, Brien Holden Vision Institute3, University of New South Wales4, International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness5, Moorfields Eye Hospital6, York Hospital7, Heidelberg University8, L V Prasad Eye Institute9, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary10, Nova Southeastern University11, University of KwaZulu-Natal12, National Health and Medical Research Council13, World Health Organization14, National University of Singapore15, University of Melbourne16, Selçuk University17, University of Miami18, University of Adelaide19, Queen's University Belfast20, Harvard University21, The George Institute for Global Health22, University of Washington23, University of Michigan24, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman25, University of Alabama at Birmingham26, National Institutes of Health27, Johns Hopkins University28, University of São Paulo29, Henry Ford Health System30, University College London31, Sankara Nethralaya32, University of Nairobi33, University of Georgia34, University of Utah35, Federal University of São Paulo36, Yale University37, Alberta Children's Hospital38, University of Illinois at Chicago39, Medical College of Wisconsin40, Novartis41, University of Udine42, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign43, Royal Children's Hospital44, University of Missouri45, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention46, University of Milan47, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai48, Mayo Clinic49, Pan American Health Organization50, University of Indonesia51, University of Pennsylvania52, University of Crete53, University of Southern California54, University of Florence55, Capital Medical University56, Leipzig University57
TL;DR: A series of regression models were fitted to estimate the proportion of moderate or severe vision impairment and blindness by cause, age, region, and year, and found that world regions varied markedly in the causes of blindness and vision impairment in this age group.

1,909 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factor study 2013 (GBD 2013) as mentioned in this paper provides a timely opportunity to update the comparative risk assessment with new data for exposure, relative risks, and evidence on the appropriate counterfactual risk distribution.

1,656 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Erich D. Jarvis1, Siavash Mirarab2, Andre J. Aberer3, Bo Li4, Bo Li5, Bo Li6, Peter Houde7, Cai Li6, Cai Li5, Simon Y. W. Ho8, Brant C. Faircloth9, Benoit Nabholz, Jason T. Howard1, Alexander Suh10, Claudia C. Weber10, Rute R. da Fonseca11, Jianwen Li, Fang Zhang Zhang, Hui Li, Long Zhou, Nitish Narula12, Nitish Narula7, Liang Liu13, Ganesh Ganapathy1, Bastien Boussau, Shamsuzzoha Bayzid2, Volodymyr Zavidovych1, Sankar Subramanian14, Toni Gabaldón15, Salvador Capella-Gutierrez, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Bhanu Rekepalli16, Bhanu Rekepalli17, Kasper Munch18, Mikkel H. Schierup18, Bent E. K. Lindow11, Wesley C. Warren19, David A. Ray, Richard E. Green20, Michael William Bruford21, Xiangjiang Zhan22, Xiangjiang Zhan21, Andrew Dixon, Shengbin Li4, Ning Li23, Yinhua Huang23, Elizabeth P. Derryberry24, Elizabeth P. Derryberry25, Mads F. Bertelsen26, Frederick H. Sheldon25, Robb T. Brumfield25, Claudio V. Mello27, Claudio V. Mello28, Peter V. Lovell28, Morgan Wirthlin28, Maria Paula Cruz Schneider27, Francisco Prosdocimi27, José Alfredo Samaniego11, Amhed Missael Vargas Velazquez11, Alonzo Alfaro-Núñez11, Paula F. Campos11, Bent O. Petersen29, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontén29, An Pas, Thomas L. Bailey, R. Paul Scofield30, Michael Bunce31, David M. Lambert14, Qi Zhou, Polina L. Perelman32, Amy C. Driskell33, Beth Shapiro20, Zijun Xiong, Yongli Zeng, Shiping Liu, Zhenyu Li, Binghang Liu, Kui Wu, Jin Xiao, Xiong Yinqi, Quiemei Zheng, Yong Zhang, Huanming Yang, Jian Wang, Linnéa Smeds10, Frank E. Rheindt34, Michael J. Braun35, Jon Fjeldså11, Ludovic Orlando11, F. Keith Barker6, Knud A. Jønsson6, Warren E. Johnson33, Klaus-Peter Koepfli33, Stephen J. O'Brien36, David Haussler, Oliver A. Ryder, Carsten Rahbek6, Eske Willerslev11, Gary R. Graves6, Gary R. Graves33, Travis C. Glenn13, John E. McCormack37, Dave Burt38, Hans Ellegren10, Per Alström, Scott V. Edwards39, Alexandros Stamatakis3, David P. Mindell40, Joel Cracraft6, Edward L. Braun41, Tandy Warnow42, Tandy Warnow2, Wang Jun, M. Thomas P. Gilbert6, M. Thomas P. Gilbert31, Guojie Zhang5, Guojie Zhang11 
12 Dec 2014-Science
TL;DR: A genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of 48 species representing all orders of Neoaves recovered a highly resolved tree that confirms previously controversial sister or close relationships and identifies the first divergence in Neoaves, two groups the authors named Passerea and Columbea.
Abstract: To better determine the history of modern birds, we performed a genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of 48 species representing all orders of Neoaves using phylogenomic methods created to handle genome-scale data. We recovered a highly resolved tree that confirms previously controversial sister or close relationships. We identified the first divergence in Neoaves, two groups we named Passerea and Columbea, representing independent lineages of diverse and convergently evolved land and water bird species. Among Passerea, we infer the common ancestor of core landbirds to have been an apex predator and confirm independent gains of vocal learning. Among Columbea, we identify pigeons and flamingoes as belonging to sister clades. Even with whole genomes, some of the earliest branches in Neoaves proved challenging to resolve, which was best explained by massive protein-coding sequence convergence and high levels of incomplete lineage sorting that occurred during a rapid radiation after the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event about 66 million years ago.

1,624 citations


Authors

Showing all 6722 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Jasvinder A. Singh1762382223370
John D. Minna169951106363
Yang Gao1682047146301
Stephen J. O'Brien153106293025
Carlos Escobar148118495346
David Price138168793535
António Amorim136147796519
James Mueller134119487738
Peter R Hobson133159094257
J. Boudreau1321606114745
Marzio Nessi129104678641
Riccardo-Maria Bianchi12687073816
Alan E. Kazdin12549864161
Johannes Erdmann12273266864
Harinder Singh Bawa12079866120
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
86.7K papers, 3.9M citations

85% related

State University of New York System
78K papers, 2.9M citations

85% related

Indiana University
150K papers, 6.3M citations

84% related

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
185.3K papers, 9.9M citations

84% related

University of Illinois at Chicago
110.5K papers, 4.2M citations

84% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202327
202278
2021967
2020786
2019691
2018599