Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre

About: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre is a healthcare organization based out in Oxford, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Arthroplasty. The organization has 2082 authors who have published 2920 publications receiving 145718 citations.

Arthrodesis of the hindfoot for valgus deformity. An entirely medial approach.

Abstract: Correction of valgus deformity of the hindfoot using a medial approach for a triple fusion has only recently been described for patients with tight lateral soft tissues which would be compromised using the traditional lateral approach. We present a series of eight patients with fixed valgus deformity of the hindfoot who had correction by hindfoot fusion using this approach. In addition, we further extended the indications to allow concomitant ankle fusion. The medial approach allowed us to excise medial ulcers caused by the prominent medial bony structures, giving simultaneous correction of the deformity and successful internal fixation. We had no problems with primary wound healing and experienced no subsequent infection or wound breakdown. From a mean fixed valgus deformity of 58.8 degrees (45 degrees to 66 degrees) pre-operatively, we achieved a mean post-operative valgus angulation of 13.6 degrees (7 degrees to 23 degrees). All the feet were subsequently accommodated in shoes. The mean time to arthrodesis was 5.25 months (3 to 9). We therefore recommend the medial approach for the correction of severe fixed valgus hindfoot deformities.

‘I can’t see any reason for stopping doing anything, but I might have to do it differently’ – restoring hope to patients with persistent non-specific low back pain – a qualitative study

Abstract: Purpose: To explore the differences in narrative between patients with persistent non-specific low back pain (PLBP) who benefited from a pain management programme, and those who did not benefit. Method: We conducted interviews with 20 patients attending a pain management programme; prior to attending the programme, immediately following the programme and at one year. Our analysis focused on a theoretical sample of patients who either described dramatic life improvements at one year, and who described themselves as much worse. We used the methods of grounded theory. Results: We found that finding hope was central to good outcome. Patients restored hope by making certain changes; (a) deconstructing specific fears, (b) constructing an acceptable explanatory model (c) reconstructing self identity by making acceptable changes. Those who had not restored hope retained fears of loss of self, remained committed to the biomedical model and were unable to make acceptable changes. Conclusions: Our findings may help ...