Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre

About: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre is a healthcare organization based out in Oxford, United Kingdom. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Arthroplasty. The organization has 2082 authors who have published 2920 publications receiving 145718 citations.

Lack of Association between Toll-Like Receptor 2 Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Severe Disease Caused by Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: To investigate a putative link between genetically determined variations in Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and the occurrence of severe Staphylococcus aureus infection, the functional Arg753Gln single-nucleotide polymorphism and the GT repeat microsatellite in the TLR2 gene were examined in a large case-control study. No associations with disease or mortality attributable to these features were found.

Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: A multicentre study of 1000 knees

Abstract: The Cementless Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (OUKR) was developed to address problems related to cementation, and has been demonstrated in a randomised study to have similar clinical outcomes with fewer radiolucencies than observed with the cemented device. However, before its widespread use it is necessary to clarify contraindications and assess the complications. This requires a larger study than any previously published. We present a prospective multicentre series of 1000 cementless OUKRs in 881 patients at a minimum follow-up of one year. All patients had radiological assessment aligned to the bone–implant interfaces and clinical scores. Analysis was performed at a mean of 38.2 months (19 to 88) following surgery. A total of 17 patients died (comprising 19 knees (1.9%)), none as a result of surgery; there were no tibial or femoral loosenings. A total of 19 knees (1.9%) had significant implant-related complications or required revision. Implant survival at six years was 97.2%, and there was a partial radiolucency at the bone–implant interface in 72 knees (8.9%), with no complete radiolucencies. There was no significant increase in complication rate compared with cemented fixation (p = 0.87), and no specific contraindications to cementless fixation were identified. Cementless OUKR appears to be safe and reproducible in patients with end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee, with radiological evidence of improved fixation compared with previous reports using cemented fixation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:181–7.

Theory and Practice of Meniscal Knee Replacement: Designing against Wear:

Abstract: This paper attributes the high rate of high-density polyethylene (HDP) wear in many knee prostheses to incongruity of their articular surfaces. The authors discuss the anatomical and kinematic features of the knee which have led most designers to choose incongruous surfaces and review the reasons for employing free bearings, analogues of the natural menisci, to provide congruity without restriction of movement. There are theoretical reasons against employing freely mobile bearing in the absence of a functioning anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the authors' experience has confirmed this limitation in practice. It is concluded that, in bicompartmental replacement, the movements of the meniscal bearing should be limited in the anteroposterior direction. For unicompartmental arthritis, an unconstrained bearing can be employed if, as is usually the case, all ligaments are intact.

A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis.

Abstract: We carried out a study to compare the sensitivity to change of disease specific compared with more generic health status instruments in relation to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A sample of 102 patients was recruited and assessed by means of 4 health status instruments and standard rheumatological measures on 3 occasions separated by 3 monthly intervals. Sensitivity to change for mobility, activities of daily living, household, pain, emotions and social dimensions were calculated. For some dimensions disease specific health status instruments performed less well. However overall there was no evidence of consistent differences between the 2 approaches. We conclude that generic instruments have a role in the assessment of RA.