Institution
Ochsner Medical Center
Healthcare•New Orleans, Louisiana, United States•
About: Ochsner Medical Center is a healthcare organization based out in New Orleans, Louisiana, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Medicine. The organization has 980 authors who have published 1159 publications receiving 49961 citations. The organization is also known as: Ochsner Hospital & Ochsner Foundation Hospital.
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: It is hypothesized that after the patient's splenectomy, a colonic focus of heterotrophic spleen became hyperplastic and led to a clinically apparent lesion.
14 citations
••
TL;DR: The lifetime prevalence of depression, suicidal thoughts, suicidal attempts, violent behavior, and trouble concentrating was consistently higher for those who misused alcohol.
Abstract: Of 1936 primary care patients screened using the alcohol portion of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, 100 met criteria for “alcohol abuse and/or dependence.” Sixty of the individuals who misused alcohol were matched to 60 who did not. All 160 patients answered questions about psychiatric symptoms and psychotropic drug use. The lifetime prevalence of depression, suicidal thoughts, suicidal attempts, violent behavior, and trouble concentrating was consistently higher for those who misused alcohol. Depression and trouble concentrating were more likely to be experienced by alcohol misusers during the past month. Gender differences were also noted for prevalence of psychiatric symptoms.
14 citations
••
TL;DR: In this ED population, the T2Bacteria assay was a rapid and sensitive detector of bacteremia from common ESKAPE pathogens and showed the theoretical potential to influence subsequent patient therapy, ranging from antibiotic de-escalation to faster time to effective therapy.
Abstract: Background Bacteremia causes a major worldwide burden, in terms of financial and productivity costs, as well the morbidity and mortality it can ultimately cause. Proper treatment of bacteremia is a challenge because of the species-dependent response to antibiotics. The T2Bacteria Panel is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration–cleared and culture-independent assay for detection of bacteremia, including common ESKAPE pathogens—Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa—and provides species identification in as little as 3.6 h directly from blood. Objective Our aim was to evaluate the T2Bacteria assay performance and potential to affect patient care in the emergency department (ED). Methods ED patients from a Louisiana and Florida center were enrolled as part of the T2Bacteria Panel clinical study, which was prospective and noninterventional. Blood samples for blood culture (BC) and T2Bacteria were matched in time and anatomic location. Results Data from 137 ED patients were evaluated. Relative to BC, T2Bacteria showed 100% positive percent agreement and 98.4% negative percent agreement. In addition, for species on the T2Bacteria Panel, the T2Bacteria assay detected 25% more positives associated with infection, and on average identified the infectious species 56.6 h faster. The T2Bacteria assay covered 70.5% of all species detected by BC. Finally, relative to actual care, the T2Bacteria assay could have potentially focused therapy in 8 patients, reduced time to a species-directed therapy in 4 patients, and reduced time to effective therapy in 4 patients. Conclusions In this ED population, the T2Bacteria assay was a rapid and sensitive detector of bacteremia from common ESKAPE pathogens and showed the theoretical potential to influence subsequent patient therapy, ranging from antibiotic de-escalation to faster time to effective therapy.
14 citations
••
TL;DR: This paper presents a meta-modelling study that shows clear trends in prognosis for heart disease in smokers and cardiologists over a long period of time and shows clear patterns of decline in cigarette smoking and alcohol abuse.
14 citations
••
Nanjing Medical University1, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai2, Dartmouth College3, Mount Sinai Hospital4, Durham University5, Christiana Care Health System6, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center7, Cleveland Clinic8, University of Pittsburgh9, Aurora Health Care10, Ochsner Medical Center11, Eli Lilly and Company12, Daiichi Sankyo13, University of London14
TL;DR: To investigate the prevalence, predictors and associations between guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT) and clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from eight academic centers in the United States, data are analyzed.
Abstract: Objectives: To investigate the prevalence, predictors and associations between guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from eight academic centers in the United States. Background: Evidence for GDMT in patients with AMI comes from randomized controlled trials. The use of GDMT in clinical practice is unknown in this setting. Methods: PROMETHEUS is a multicenter observational registry comprising 19,914 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI. Patients with AMI were divided into two groups based on the prescription of GDMT or not (non-GDMT) at discharge. GDMT was defined according to American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) class I recommendations, specifically, dual antiplatelet therapy, statin and beta-blocker for all AMI patients, and additional ACEI/ARB in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40%, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke or unplanned target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year. Results: Out of 4,834 patients with AMI, 3,356 (69.4%) patients were discharged on GDMT. Patients receiving GDMT were more often younger and male. Compared with non-GDMT patients, GDMT patients had a significantly lower frequency of comorbidities. Predictors of greater GDMT prescription at discharge were ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and increased body mass index (BMI), whereas hypertension, prior PCI, anemia and CKD were associated with less GDMT prescription. At 1 year, the use of GDMT was associated with a significantly lower incidence of MACE (13.7% vs. 22.5%; adjusted HR 0.68; 95%CI 0.58–0.80; P < 0.001), death (3.7% vs. 9.4%; adjusted HR 0.61; 95%CI 0.46–0.80; P < 0.001), and unplanned TVR (8.4% vs. 11.3%; adjusted HR 0.76; 95%CI 0.61–0.96; P = 0.020). However, there were no significant differences in the incidence of MI (4.3% vs. 7.0%; adjusted HR 0.75; 95%CI 0.56–1.01; P = 0.056), stroke (1.5% vs. 2.0%; adjusted HR 0.79; 95%CI 0.47–1.34; P = 0.384) between the two groups. Conclusion: In a contemporary practice setting in the United States, GDMT was utilized in just over two-thirds of AMI patients undergoing PCI. Predictors of GDMT prescription at discharge included STEMI, BMI and absence of hypertension, CKD, anemia or prior PCI. Use of GDMT was associated with significantly lower risk of 1-year MACE and mortality.
14 citations
Authors
Showing all 993 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Carl J. Lavie | 106 | 1135 | 49318 |
Michael R. Jaff | 82 | 442 | 28891 |
Michael F. O'Rourke | 81 | 451 | 35355 |
Mandeep R. Mehra | 80 | 644 | 31939 |
Richard V. Milani | 80 | 454 | 23410 |
Christopher J. White | 77 | 621 | 25767 |
Bruce A. Reitz | 74 | 333 | 18457 |
Robert C. Bourge | 69 | 273 | 24397 |
Sana M. Al-Khatib | 69 | 377 | 17370 |
Hector O. Ventura | 66 | 478 | 16379 |
Andrew Mason | 63 | 360 | 15198 |
Aaron S. Dumont | 60 | 386 | 13020 |
Philip J. Kadowitz | 55 | 379 | 11951 |
David W. Dunn | 54 | 195 | 8999 |
Lydia A. Bazzano | 51 | 267 | 13581 |