scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Ohio State University

EducationColumbus, Ohio, United States
About: Ohio State University is a education organization based out in Columbus, Ohio, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Cancer. The organization has 102421 authors who have published 222715 publications receiving 8373403 citations. The organization is also known as: Ohio State & The Ohio State University.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Brian Yanny1, Constance M. Rockosi2, Heidi Jo Newberg3, Gillian R. Knapp4, Jennifer K. Adelman-McCarthy1, Bonnie Alcorn1, S. Allam1, Carlos Allende Prieto5, Carlos Allende Prieto6, Deokkeun An7, K. S. J. Anderson8, K. S. J. Anderson9, Scott F. Anderson10, Coryn A. L. Bailer-Jones11, Steve Bastian1, Timothy C. Beers12, Eric F. Bell11, Vasily Belokurov13, Dmitry Bizyaev9, Norm Blythe9, John J. Bochanski10, William N. Boroski1, Jarle Brinchmann14, J. Brinkmann9, Howard Brewington9, Larry N. Carey10, Kyle M. Cudworth15, Michael L. Evans10, Nick Evans13, Evalyn Gates15, Boris T. Gänsicke16, Bruce Gillespie9, G. F. Gilmore13, Ada Nebot Gomez-Moran, Eva K. Grebel17, Jim Greenwell10, James E. Gunn4, Cathy Jordan9, Wendell Jordan9, Paul Harding18, Hugh C. Harris, John S. Hendry1, Diana Holder9, Inese I. Ivans4, Željko Ivezić10, Sebastian Jester11, Jennifer A. Johnson7, Stephen M. Kent1, S. J. Kleinman9, Alexei Y. Kniazev11, Jurek Krzesinski9, Richard G. Kron15, Nikolay Kuropatkin1, Svetlana Lebedeva1, Young Sun Lee12, R. French Leger1, Sébastien Lépine19, Steve Levine, Huan Lin1, Dan Long9, Craig P. Loomis4, Robert H. Lupton4, O. Malanushenko9, Viktor Malanushenko9, Bruce Margon2, David Martínez-Delgado11, P. M. McGehee20, Dave Monet, Heather L. Morrison18, Jeffrey A. Munn, Eric H. Neilsen1, Atsuko Nitta9, John E. Norris21, Daniel Oravetz9, Russell Owen10, Nikhil Padmanabhan22, Kaike Pan9, R. S. Peterson1, Jeffrey R. Pier, Jared Platson1, Paola Re Fiorentin11, Paola Re Fiorentin23, Gordon T. Richards24, Hans-Walter Rix11, David J. Schlegel22, Donald P. Schneider25, Matthias R. Schreiber26, Axel Schwope, Valena C. Sibley1, Audrey Simmons9, Stephanie A. Snedden9, J. Allyn Smith27, Larry Stark10, Fritz Stauffer9, Matthias Steinmetz, Christopher Stoughton1, Mark SubbaRao28, Mark SubbaRao15, Alexander S. Szalay29, Paula Szkody10, Aniruddha R. Thakar29, Sivarani Thirupathi12, Douglas L. Tucker1, A. Uomoto30, Daniel E. Vanden Berk25, S. Vidrih17, Yogesh Wadadekar31, Yogesh Wadadekar4, S. Watters9, R. Wilhelm32, Rosemary F. G. Wyse29, Jean Yarger9, Daniel B. Zucker13 
TL;DR: The Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (SEGUE) Survey as mentioned in this paper obtained approximately 240,000 moderate-resolution spectra from 3900 to 9000 of fainter Milky Way stars (14.0 10 per resolution element).
Abstract: The Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration (SEGUE) Survey obtained {approx}240,000 moderate-resolution (R {approx} 1800) spectra from 3900 {angstrom} to 9000 {angstrom} of fainter Milky Way stars (14.0 10 per resolution element, stellar atmospheric parameters are estimated, including metallicity, surface gravity, and effective temperature. SEGUE obtained 3500 deg{sup 2} of additional ugriz imaging (primarily at low Galactic latitudes) providing precise multicolor photometry ({sigma}(g, r, i) {approx} 2%), ({sigma}(u, z) {approx} 3%) and astrometry ({approx}0.1) for spectroscopic target selection. The stellar spectra, imaging data, and derived parameter catalogs for this survey are publicly available as part of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7.

1,133 citations

Book
17 Jul 2000
TL;DR: In this article, the Fourier series is used to measure the response of a single-degree-of-freedom system to initial and non-periodic oscillations, respectively.
Abstract: 1 Concepts from Vibrations 2 Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems to Initial Excitations 3 Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems to Harmonic and Periodic Excitations 4 Response of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Systems to Nonperiodic Excitations 5 Two-Degree-of-Freedom Systems 6 Elements of Analytical Dynamics 7 Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Systems 8 Distributed-Parameter Systems: Exact Solutions 9 Distributed-Parameter Systems: Approximate Mathods 10 The Finite Element Method 11 Nonlinear Oscilations 12 Random Vibrations Appendix A. Fourier Series Appendix B. Laplace Transformation Appendix C. Linear Algebra

1,133 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article explored the effect of spouses' contribution to family income on how housework is divided and found that women decrease their housework as their earnings increase, up to the point where both spouses contribute equally to income.
Abstract: Using data from Australia and the United States, the authors explore the effect of spouses’ contribution to family income on how housework is divided. Consistent with exchange‐bargaining theory, women decrease their housework as their earnings increase, up to the point where both spouses contribute equally to income. In other respects, gender trumps money. The base level of housework for women is much higher. Among the small percentage of couples who are in the range where women provide 51%–100% of household income, the change in housework is opposite what exchange theory predicts: couples that deviate from the normative income standard (men make more money than women) seem to compensate with a more traditional division of household work.

1,131 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations


Authors

Showing all 103197 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Paul M. Ridker2331242245097
George Davey Smith2242540248373
Carlo M. Croce1981135189007
Eric J. Topol1931373151025
Bernard Rosner1901162147661
David H. Weinberg183700171424
Anil K. Jain1831016192151
Michael I. Jordan1761016216204
Kay-Tee Khaw1741389138782
Richard K. Wilson173463260000
Yang Yang1642704144071
Brian L Winer1621832128850
Jian-Kang Zhu161550105551
Elaine R. Mardis156485226700
R. E. Hughes1541312110970
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Minnesota
257.9K papers, 11.9M citations

98% related

Cornell University
235.5K papers, 12.2M citations

96% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

96% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

95% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

95% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023261
20221,236
20219,948
20209,945
20199,052
20188,656