scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Oklahoma State University–Stillwater

EducationStillwater, Oklahoma, United States
About: Oklahoma State University–Stillwater is a education organization based out in Stillwater, Oklahoma, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Large Hadron Collider. The organization has 18267 authors who have published 36743 publications receiving 1107500 citations. The organization is also known as: Oklahoma State University & OKState.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a foundation for an understanding of the dynamics of venture capital from the entrepreneur's point of view, and discuss some of the key issues of which entrepreneurs need to be aware when dealing with venture capitalists during each of these three investment phases.
Abstract: Executive Overview This article provides a foundation for an understanding of the dynamics of venture capital from the entrepreneur's point of view. An important aspect of understanding venture capital involves the different sources of risk capital for the entrepreneur, i.e., (classic) venture capitalists (VCs), business angels, and corporate venture capitalists. Furthermore, whatever source of risk capital entrepreneurs choose, they have to take into account the different phases of the investment cycle, i.e., the pre-investment, post-investment, and exit phases. We discuss some of the key issues of which entrepreneurs need to be aware when dealing with venture capitalists during each of these three investment phases. Furthermore, we provide hands-on advice to help entrepreneurs maximize the value of their relationship with VCs throughout the investment cycle, and we point to trouble spots which can endanger value creation. For instance, in the pre-investment phase, the challenges of finding an (adequate)...

223 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Helen Phillips1, Carlos A. Guerra2, Marie Luise Carolina Bartz3, Maria J. I. Briones4, George G. Brown5, Thomas W. Crowther6, Olga Ferlian1, Konstantin B. Gongalsky7, Johan van den Hoogen6, Julia Krebs1, Alberto Orgiazzi, Devin Routh6, Benjamin Schwarz8, Elizabeth M. Bach, Joanne M. Bennett2, Ulrich Brose9, Thibaud Decaëns, Birgitta König-Ries9, Michel Loreau, Jérôme Mathieu, Christian Mulder10, Wim H. van der Putten11, Kelly S. Ramirez, Matthias C. Rillig12, David J. Russell13, Michiel Rutgers, Madhav P. Thakur, Franciska T. de Vries, Diana H. Wall14, David A. Wardle, Miwa Arai15, Fredrick O. Ayuke16, Geoff H. Baker17, Robin Beauséjour, José Camilo Bedano18, Klaus Birkhofer19, Eric Blanchart, Bernd Blossey20, Thomas Bolger21, Robert L. Bradley, Mac A. Callaham22, Yvan Capowiez, Mark E. Caulfield11, Amy Choi23, Felicity Crotty24, Andrea Dávalos25, Andrea Dávalos20, Darío J. Díaz Cosín, Anahí Domínguez18, Andrés Esteban Duhour26, Nick van Eekeren, Christoph Emmerling27, Liliana B. Falco26, Rosa Fernández, Steven J. Fonte14, Carlos Fragoso, André L.C. Franco, Martine Fugère, Abegail T Fusilero28, Shaieste Gholami29, Michael J. Gundale, Mónica Gutiérrez López, Davorka K. Hackenberger30, Luis M. Hernández, Takuo Hishi31, Andrew R. Holdsworth32, Martin Holmstrup33, Kristine N. Hopfensperger34, Esperanza Huerta Lwanga11, Veikko Huhta, Tunsisa T. Hurisso14, Tunsisa T. Hurisso35, Basil V. Iannone, Madalina Iordache36, Monika Joschko, Nobuhiro Kaneko37, Radoslava Kanianska38, Aidan M. Keith39, Courtland Kelly14, Maria Kernecker, Jonatan Klaminder, Armand W. Koné40, Yahya Kooch41, Sanna T. Kukkonen, H. Lalthanzara42, Daniel R. Lammel12, Daniel R. Lammel43, Iurii M. Lebedev7, Yiqing Li44, Juan B. Jesús Lidón, Noa Kekuewa Lincoln45, Scott R. Loss46, Raphaël Marichal, Radim Matula, Jan Hendrik Moos47, Gerardo Moreno48, Alejandro Morón-Ríos, Bart Muys49, Johan Neirynck50, Lindsey Norgrove, Marta Novo, Visa Nuutinen51, Victoria Nuzzo, Mujeeb Rahman P, Johan Pansu17, Shishir Paudel46, Guénola Pérès, Lorenzo Pérez-Camacho52, Raúl Piñeiro, Jean-François Ponge, Muhammad Rashid53, Muhammad Rashid54, Salvador Rebollo52, Javier Rodeiro-Iglesias4, Miguel Á. Rodríguez52, Alexander M. Roth55, Guillaume Xavier Rousseau56, Anna Rożen57, Ehsan Sayad29, Loes van Schaik58, Bryant C. Scharenbroch59, Michael Schirrmann60, Olaf Schmidt21, Boris Schröder61, Julia Seeber62, Maxim Shashkov63, Maxim Shashkov64, Jaswinder Singh65, Sandy M. Smith23, Michael Steinwandter, José Antonio Talavera66, Dolores Trigo, Jiro Tsukamoto67, Anne W. de Valença, Steven J. Vanek14, Iñigo Virto68, Adrian A. Wackett55, Matthew W. Warren, Nathaniel H. Wehr, Joann K. Whalen69, Michael B. Wironen70, Volkmar Wolters71, Irina V. Zenkova, Weixin Zhang72, Erin K. Cameron73, Nico Eisenhauer1 
Leipzig University1, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg2, Universidade Positivo3, University of Vigo4, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária5, ETH Zurich6, Moscow State University7, University of Freiburg8, University of Jena9, University of Catania10, Wageningen University and Research Centre11, Free University of Berlin12, Senckenberg Museum13, Colorado State University14, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization15, University of Nairobi16, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation17, National Scientific and Technical Research Council18, Brandenburg University of Technology19, Cornell University20, University College Dublin21, United States Forest Service22, University of Toronto23, Aberystwyth University24, State University of New York at Cortland25, National University of Luján26, University of Trier27, University of the Philippines Mindanao28, Razi University29, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek30, Kyushu University31, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency32, Aarhus University33, Northern Kentucky University34, Lincoln University (Missouri)35, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad36, Fukushima University37, Matej Bel University38, Lancaster University39, Université d'Abobo-Adjamé40, Tarbiat Modares University41, Pachhunga University College42, University of São Paulo43, University of Hawaii at Hilo44, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources45, Oklahoma State University–Stillwater46, Forest Research Institute47, University of Extremadura48, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven49, Research Institute for Nature and Forest50, Natural Resources Institute Finland51, University of Alcalá52, King Abdulaziz University53, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology54, University of Minnesota55, Federal University of Maranhão56, Jagiellonian University57, Technical University of Berlin58, University of Wisconsin-Madison59, Leibniz Association60, Braunschweig University of Technology61, University of Innsbruck62, Keldysh Institute of Applied Mathematics63, Russian Academy of Sciences64, Khalsa College, Amritsar65, University of La Laguna66, Kōchi University67, Universidad Pública de Navarra68, McGill University69, The Nature Conservancy70, University of Giessen71, Henan University72, University of Saint Mary73
25 Oct 2019-Science
TL;DR: It was found that local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, displaying patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms, which suggest that climate change may have serious implications for earthworm communities and for the functions they provide.
Abstract: Soil organisms, including earthworms, are a key component of terrestrial ecosystems. However, little is known about their diversity, their distribution, and the threats affecting them. We compiled a global dataset of sampled earthworm communities from 6928 sites in 57 countries as a basis for predicting patterns in earthworm diversity, abundance, and biomass. We found that local species richness and abundance typically peaked at higher latitudes, displaying patterns opposite to those observed in aboveground organisms. However, high species dissimilarity across tropical locations may cause diversity across the entirety of the tropics to be higher than elsewhere. Climate variables were found to be more important in shaping earthworm communities than soil properties or habitat cover. These findings suggest that climate change may have serious implications for earthworm communities and for the functions they provide.

223 citations

01 Jan 2011
TL;DR: In this paper, a journal article appeared in a journal published by Wiley-Blackwell, where the authors were not permitted to make work available in an institutional repository. But they did not specify why.
Abstract: This article appeared in a journal published by Wiley-Blackwell. Under Wiley's copyright, mandated authors are not permitted to make work available in an institutional repository.

222 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is shown that fire is an important component of large ungulate behavior with a strong influence on site selection that drives the fire–grazing interaction, an ecosystem process that supersedes fire and grazing as separate factors, shaping grassland landscapes.
Abstract: The interactions between fire and grazing are widespread throughout fire-dependent landscapes. The utilization of burned areas by grazing animals establishes the fire–grazing interaction, but the preference for recently burned areas relative to other influences (water, topography, etc.) is unknown. In this study, we determine the strength of the fire–grazing interaction by quantifying the influence of fire on ungulate site selection. We compare the preference for recently burned patches relative to the influence of other environmental factors that contribute to site selection; compare that preference between native and introduced ungulates; test relationships between area burned and herbivore preference; and determine forage quality and quantity as mechanisms of site selection. We used two large ungulate species at two grassland locations within the southern Great Plains, USA. At each location, spatially distinct patches were burned within larger areas through time, allowing animals to select among burned and unburned areas. Using fine scale ungulate location data, we estimated resource selection functions to examine environmental factors in site selection. Ungulates preferred recently burned areas and avoided areas with greater time since fire, regardless of the size of landscape, herbivore species, or proportion of area burned. Forage quality was inversely related to time since fire, while forage quantity was positively related. We show that fire is an important component of large ungulate behavior with a strong influence on site selection that drives the fire–grazing interaction. This interaction is an ecosystem process that supersedes fire and grazing as separate factors, shaping grassland landscapes. Inclusion of the fire–grazing interaction into ecological studies and conservation practices of fire-prone systems will aid in better understanding and managing these systems.

222 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Compared with cigarettes, G2 and G3 e-cigarettes resulted in significantly lower levels of exposure to a potent lung carcinogen and cardiovascular toxicant and have significant implications for understanding the addiction potential of these devices and their viability/suitability as aids to smoking cessation.
Abstract: Introduction Electronic cigarettes’ (e-cigarettes) viability as a public health strategy to end smoking will likely be determined by their ability to mimic the pharmacokinetic profile of a cigarette while also exposing users to significantly lower levels of harmful/potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs). The present study examined the nicotine delivery profile of third- (G3) versus second-generation (G2) e-cigarette devices and their users9 exposure to nicotine and select HPHCs compared with cigarette smokers. Methods 30 participants (10 smokers, 9 G2 and 11 G3 users) completed baseline questionnaires and provided exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO), saliva and urine samples. Following a 12-hour nicotine abstinence, G2 and G3 users completed a 2-hour vaping session (ie, 5 min, 10-puff bout followed by ad libitum puffing for 115 min). Blood samples, subjective effects, device characteristics and e-liquid consumption were assessed. Results Smokers, G2 and G3 users had similar baseline levels of cotinine, but smokers had 4 and 7 times higher levels of eCO (p Discussion Under normal use conditions, both G2 and G3 devices deliver cigarette-like amounts of nicotine, but G3 devices matched the amount and speed of nicotine delivery of a conventional cigarette. Compared with cigarettes, G2 and G3 e-cigarettes resulted in significantly lower levels of exposure to a potent lung carcinogen and cardiovascular toxicant. These findings have significant implications for understanding the addiction potential of these devices and their viability/suitability as aids to smoking cessation.

222 citations


Authors

Showing all 18403 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Gerald I. Shulman164579109520
James M. Tiedje150688102287
Robert J. Sternberg149106689193
Josh Moss139101989255
Brad Abbott137156698604
Itsuo Nakano135153997905
Luis M. Liz-Marzán13261661684
Flera Rizatdinova130124289525
Bernd Stelzer129120981931
Alexander Khanov129121987089
Dugan O'Neil128100080700
Michel Vetterli12890176064
Josu Cantero12684673616
Nicholas A. Kotov12357455210
Wei Chen122194689460
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign
225.1K papers, 10.1M citations

94% related

Pennsylvania State University
196.8K papers, 8.3M citations

93% related

Purdue University
163.5K papers, 5.7M citations

93% related

University of California, Davis
180K papers, 8M citations

93% related

University of Florida
200K papers, 7.1M citations

92% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202336
2022254
20211,902
20201,780
20191,633
20181,529