Institution
Østfold University College
Education•Halden, Norway•
About: Østfold University College is a education organization based out in Halden, Norway. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Competence (human resources). The organization has 438 authors who have published 1213 publications receiving 12510 citations. The organization is also known as: HiØ.
Topics: Population, Competence (human resources), Software development, Health care, Context (language use)
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented a Journal of Banking & Finance (JBankFin) journal article with the following abstracts and corresponding abstracts: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jbankfin.2008.11.009
Abstract: Accepted version of article published in the journal: Journal of Banking & Finance Published version available on Science Direct:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.11.009
603 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a method to solve the problem of the "missing link" problem in order to find the missing link between the source and the target. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.006
531 citations
••
21 May 2011TL;DR: Using largely qualitative questionnaire and interview methods, a range of technical, organizational and social factors that apparently influence organizational responses to MDE are investigated and its perception as a successful or unsuccessful organizational intervention is investigated.
Abstract: This paper presents some initial results from a twelve-month empirical research study of model driven engineering (MDE). Using largely qualitative questionnaire and interview methods we investigate and document a range of technical, organizational and social factors that apparently influence organizational responses to MDE: specifically, its perception as a successful or unsuccessful organizational intervention. We then outline a range of lessons learned. Whilst, as with all qualitative research, these lessons should be interpreted with care, they should also be seen as providing a greater understanding of MDE practice in industry, as well as shedding light on the varied, and occasionally surprising, social, technical and organizational factors that affect success and failure. We conclude by suggesting how the next phase of the research will attempt to investigate some of these issues from a different angle and in greater depth.
383 citations
••
University of Oxford1, University of York2, Queen Mary University of London3, Imperial College London4, University of London5, University of Plymouth6, University of Manchester7, University of Exeter8, McGill University9, Østfold University College10, University of Alberta11, Stony Brook University12, Rutgers University13, University of St Andrews14, Nottingham Trent University15, University of Leicester16, Dartmouth College17, University of Oslo18, King's College London19, University College London20, University of Southampton21, Laval University22, University of Wolverhampton23, University of Cape Town24, University of Sydney25, Radboud University Nijmegen26, University of Toronto27, Durham University28, University of Rochester29, Cardiff University30, University of Auckland31, University of Western Ontario32, University of Glasgow33, University of Birmingham34, University of Aberdeen35, Portland State University36, University of Utah37, University of Nottingham38, Bangor University39, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill40, RAND Corporation41, University of British Columbia42, Karolinska Institutet43, University of Stirling44, Brunel University London45
TL;DR: Seventy six senior academics from 11 countries invite The BMJ ’s editors to reconsider their policy of rejecting qualitative research on the grounds of low priority.
Abstract: Seventy six senior academics from 11 countries invite The BMJ ’s editors to reconsider their policy of rejecting qualitative research on the grounds of low priority. They challenge the journal to develop a proactive, scholarly, and pluralist approach to research that aligns with its stated mission
303 citations
••
TL;DR: This study analyzed various prospects of the country in renewable energy and discusses in-depth about the three Indian states, namely Karnataka, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, which pioneers the renewable energy production in India.
Abstract: Clean and environment-friendly energy harvesting are of prime interest today as it is one of the key enablers in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as well as accelerates social progress and enhances living standards. India, the second-most populous nation with a population of 1.353 billion, is one of the largest consumers of fossil fuels in the world which is responsible for global warming. An ever-increasing population is projected until 2050, and consequently, the energy demand in the upcoming decades will be co-accelerated by the rapid industrial growth. The Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) with the support of National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog is working to achieve the Indian Government's target of attaining 175 GW through renewable energy resources. Many Indian states are currently increasing their renewable energy capacity in an objective to meet future energy demand. The review paper discusses in-depth about the three Indian states, namely Karnataka, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, which pioneers the renewable energy production in India. The global energy scenario was discussed in detail with Indian contrast. Further, the barriers to the development of renewable energy generation and policies of the Indian government are discussed in detail to promote renewable energy generation throughout India as well as globally since the challenges are similar for other nations. This study analyzed various prospects of the country in renewable energy which has been done in a purpose to help the scholars, researchers, and policymakers of the nation, as it gives an insight into the present renewable energy scenario of the country.
254 citations
Authors
Showing all 452 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Per Morten Sandset | 54 | 325 | 11220 |
Anna-Lena Kjøniksen | 39 | 155 | 4591 |
Ricardo Colomo-Palacios | 37 | 311 | 4981 |
Camilla Ihlebæk | 33 | 77 | 3892 |
Julianne Cheek | 33 | 89 | 3421 |
Tomm Bernklev | 30 | 90 | 4190 |
Nand Kishor | 28 | 153 | 3476 |
Øystein Haugen | 27 | 121 | 2598 |
Turid Heiberg | 25 | 52 | 2945 |
Gisela Håkansson | 25 | 127 | 2084 |
Stefan Sütterlin | 22 | 91 | 1507 |
Guro Huby | 21 | 51 | 2414 |
Lars-Petter Jelsness-Jørgensen | 20 | 59 | 1022 |
Arne Løkketangen | 20 | 42 | 1923 |
Lucian Mihet-Popa | 19 | 115 | 1573 |