Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The results show that the NLNS Wiener filter produces better denoising results in terms of qualitative and quantitative measures compared with otherDenoising methods, such as classical Wiener Filter, the anisotropic diffusion filter, the total variation minimization and the nonlocal means filter.
61 citations
••
Ton Duc Thang University1, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore2, University of Malaya3, Kyungpook National University4, P A College of Engineering5, Center for Advanced Materials6, King Khalid University7, Jiangsu University8, Banha University9, King Abdulaziz University10, Menoufia University11, Taif University12
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated the emission and performance characteristics of a CI engine using biodiesel blends with three different nanoparticles, including CNT, TiO2 and Al2O3 nanoparticles.
59 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the optimum production yield of Food Industrial Waste Oil Methyl Ester (FIWOME, B100, FIWOB) was modelled using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) techniques.
59 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, the authors reviewed the role of tilt angles and particularly locating the optimum tilt angle using different methods, which can be categorized mainly into mathematical model based, experimental based, simulation based, or combination of any of these.
Abstract: With the growing demand of economically feasible, clean, and renewable energy, the use of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems is increasing. The PV panel performance to generate electrical energy depends on many factors among which tilt angle is also a crucial one. Among hundreds of research work performed pertinent to solar PV panels performance, this work critically reviews the role of tilt angles and particularly locating the optimum tilt angle using different methods. The past data collected for analysis can be categorized mainly into mathematical model based, experimental based, simulation based, or combination of any of these. Single-axis tracking, dual-axis tracking, simple glass cover, hydrophobic glass cover, soiled glass, clean glass, partial shadow, use of phase-change material, computational fluid dynamic analysis, etc., are the novel methods found in the literature for analysis and locating the optimum tilt angle. For illustration purpose, few figures are provided in which the optimum tilt angle obtained on monthly, seasonally, and annual basis is shown. Research works are growing in the field of computations and simulations using online software and codes. Pure mathematical-based calculations are also reported but the trend is to combine this method with the simulation method. As the PV panel performance is found to be affected by number of parameters, their consideration in any single study is not reported. In future, work is required to carry out the experiment or simulation considering the effect of soiling, glass material, temperature, and surrounding ambience on the location of optimum tilt angle. As a whole, the optimum tilt angles reported for locations exactly on the equator line, i.e., 0° latitude, ranges between − 2.5° and 2.5°, for locations just above the equator line, i.e., latitude 2.6°–30° N ranges between 5° and 28°, for 40°–70° N, it is 29°–40°, and for 71°–90° N, it is 41°–45°. For locations at 2.6°–30° S, optimum tilt angles range between − 4° and − 32°, 30°–46° S, it is − 33° to − 36°, 47°–65° S, it is − 34° to − 50°, and for 66°–90° S it is − 51° to − 62°.
58 citations
••
TL;DR: In this article, single and multi-objective optimization of thermal management characteristics, namely maximum temperature (Tb, max), average Nusselt number (Nuavg), and coefficient of friction (Fcavg) using Cuckoo search (CS) and artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm is attempted.
58 citations
Authors
Showing all 298 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Shafiqur Rehman | 46 | 212 | 9437 |
Asif Afzal | 23 | 156 | 1653 |
Balladka Kunhanna Sarojini | 22 | 291 | 2659 |
Mohammad Asif Hussain | 18 | 45 | 1665 |
Sher Afghan Khan | 18 | 248 | 1782 |
M.K. Ramis | 13 | 33 | 443 |
Perveiz Khalid | 13 | 63 | 492 |
M. Anaul Kabir | 12 | 20 | 477 |
Zahid Ansari | 10 | 33 | 404 |
P. R. Thyla | 10 | 44 | 293 |
Mohammad Fazle Azeem | 10 | 44 | 421 |
S. Pradeep | 9 | 19 | 893 |
D. Senthilkumar | 9 | 17 | 336 |
J. Mohan | 9 | 12 | 373 |
A. D. Mohammed Samee | 9 | 12 | 254 |