scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Paris Dauphine University

EducationParis, France
About: Paris Dauphine University is a education organization based out in Paris, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Context (language use) & Population. The organization has 1766 authors who have published 6909 publications receiving 162747 citations. The organization is also known as: Paris Dauphine & Dauphine.


Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
23 Aug 2020
TL;DR: DetR as mentioned in this paper proposes a set-based global loss that forces unique predictions via bipartite matching, and a transformer encoder-decoder architecture to directly output the final set of predictions in parallel.
Abstract: We present a new method that views object detection as a direct set prediction problem. Our approach streamlines the detection pipeline, effectively removing the need for many hand-designed components like a non-maximum suppression procedure or anchor generation that explicitly encode our prior knowledge about the task. The main ingredients of the new framework, called DEtection TRansformer or DETR, are a set-based global loss that forces unique predictions via bipartite matching, and a transformer encoder-decoder architecture. Given a fixed small set of learned object queries, DETR reasons about the relations of the objects and the global image context to directly output the final set of predictions in parallel. The new model is conceptually simple and does not require a specialized library, unlike many other modern detectors. DETR demonstrates accuracy and run-time performance on par with the well-established and highly-optimized Faster R-CNN baseline on the challenging COCO object detection dataset. Moreover, DETR can be easily generalized to produce panoptic segmentation in a unified manner. We show that it significantly outperforms competitive baselines. Training code and pretrained models are available at https://github.com/facebookresearch/detr.

2,009 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel J. Benjamin1, James O. Berger2, Magnus Johannesson3, Magnus Johannesson1, Brian A. Nosek4, Brian A. Nosek5, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers6, Richard A. Berk7, Kenneth A. Bollen8, Björn Brembs9, Lawrence D. Brown7, Colin F. Camerer10, David Cesarini11, David Cesarini12, Christopher D. Chambers13, Merlise A. Clyde2, Thomas D. Cook14, Thomas D. Cook15, Paul De Boeck16, Zoltan Dienes17, Anna Dreber3, Kenny Easwaran18, Charles Efferson19, Ernst Fehr20, Fiona Fidler21, Andy P. Field17, Malcolm R. Forster22, Edward I. George7, Richard Gonzalez23, Steven N. Goodman24, Edwin J. Green25, Donald P. Green26, Anthony G. Greenwald27, Jarrod D. Hadfield28, Larry V. Hedges14, Leonhard Held20, Teck-Hua Ho29, Herbert Hoijtink30, Daniel J. Hruschka31, Kosuke Imai32, Guido W. Imbens24, John P. A. Ioannidis24, Minjeong Jeon33, James Holland Jones34, Michael Kirchler35, David Laibson36, John A. List37, Roderick J. A. Little23, Arthur Lupia23, Edouard Machery38, Scott E. Maxwell39, Michael A. McCarthy21, Don A. Moore40, Stephen L. Morgan41, Marcus R. Munafò42, Shinichi Nakagawa43, Brendan Nyhan44, Timothy H. Parker45, Luis R. Pericchi46, Marco Perugini47, Jeffrey N. Rouder48, Judith Rousseau49, Victoria Savalei50, Felix D. Schönbrodt51, Thomas Sellke52, Betsy Sinclair53, Dustin Tingley36, Trisha Van Zandt16, Simine Vazire54, Duncan J. Watts55, Christopher Winship36, Robert L. Wolpert2, Yu Xie32, Cristobal Young24, Jonathan Zinman44, Valen E. Johnson18, Valen E. Johnson1 
University of Southern California1, Duke University2, Stockholm School of Economics3, Center for Open Science4, University of Virginia5, University of Amsterdam6, University of Pennsylvania7, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill8, University of Regensburg9, California Institute of Technology10, Research Institute of Industrial Economics11, New York University12, Cardiff University13, Northwestern University14, Mathematica Policy Research15, Ohio State University16, University of Sussex17, Texas A&M University18, Royal Holloway, University of London19, University of Zurich20, University of Melbourne21, University of Wisconsin-Madison22, University of Michigan23, Stanford University24, Rutgers University25, Columbia University26, University of Washington27, University of Edinburgh28, National University of Singapore29, Utrecht University30, Arizona State University31, Princeton University32, University of California, Los Angeles33, Imperial College London34, University of Innsbruck35, Harvard University36, University of Chicago37, University of Pittsburgh38, University of Notre Dame39, University of California, Berkeley40, Johns Hopkins University41, University of Bristol42, University of New South Wales43, Dartmouth College44, Whitman College45, University of Puerto Rico46, University of Milan47, University of California, Irvine48, Paris Dauphine University49, University of British Columbia50, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich51, Purdue University52, Washington University in St. Louis53, University of California, Davis54, Microsoft55
TL;DR: The default P-value threshold for statistical significance is proposed to be changed from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries in order to reduce uncertainty in the number of discoveries.
Abstract: We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance from 0.05 to 0.005 for claims of new discoveries.

1,586 citations

Book
01 Jan 1991

1,535 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors classify image multiscale transforms into three categories: architectural requirements, structural requirements and morphological requirements, which correspond to shape-preserving properties (rotation invariance, scale invariance etc.).
Abstract: Image-processing transforms must satisfy a list of formal requirements. We discuss these requirements and classify them into three categories: “architectural requirements” like locality, recursivity and causality in the scale space, “stability requirements” like the comparison principle and “morphological requirements”, which correspond to shape-preserving properties (rotation invariance, scale invariance, etc.). A complete classification is given of all image multiscale transforms satisfying these requirements. This classification yields a characterization of all classical models and includes new ones, which all are partial differential equations. The new models we introduce have more invariance properties than all the previously known models and in particular have a projection invariance essential for shape recognition. Numerical experiments are presented and compared. The same method is applied to the multiscale analysis of movies. By introducing a property of Galilean invariance, we find a single multiscale morphological model for movie analysis.

1,104 citations

Book
01 Jan 1993
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a semi-group method for systems with unbounded control and Observation Operators Differential Systems with Delays (DOS) with delays.
Abstract: Preface to the Second Edition Preface to Volume I of the First Edition Preface to Volume II of the First Edition List of Figures Introduction Part I. Finite Dimensional Linear Control of Dynamical Systems Control of Linear Finite Dimensional Differential Systems Linear Quadratic Two-Person Zero-Sum Differential Games Part II. Representation of Infinite Dimensional Linear Control Dynamical Systems Semi-groups of Operators and Interpolation Variational Theory of Parabolic Systems Semi-group Methods for Systems with Unbounded Control and Observation Operators Differential Systems with Delays Part III. Qualitative Properties of Linear Control Dynamical Systems Controllability and Observability for a Class of Infinite Dimensional Systems Part IV. Quadratic Optimal Control: Finite Time Horizon Systems with Bounded Control Operators: Control Inside the Domain Systems with Unbounded Control Operators: Parabolic Equations with Control on the Boundary Systems with Unbounded Control Operators: Hyperbolic Equations with Control on the Boundary Part V. Quadratic Optimal Control: Infinite Time Horizon Systems with Bounded Control Operators: Control Inside the Domain Systems with Unbounded Control Operators: Parabolic Equations with Control on the Boundary Systems with Unbounded Control Operators: Hyperbolic Equations with Control on the Boundary Appendix A. An Isomorphism Result References Index

945 citations


Authors

Showing all 1819 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Pierre-Louis Lions9828357043
Laurent D. Cohen9441742709
Chris Bowler8728835399
Christian P. Robert7553536864
Albert Cohen7136819874
Gabriel Peyré6530316403
Kerrie Mengersen6573720058
Nader Masmoudi6224510507
Roland Glowinski6139320599
Jean-Michel Morel5930229134
Nizar Touzi5722411018
Jérôme Lang5727711332
William L. Megginson5516918087
Alain Bensoussan5541722704
Yves Meyer5312814604
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
École Polytechnique
39.2K papers, 1.2M citations

88% related

University of Paris
174.1K papers, 5M citations

87% related

Carnegie Mellon University
104.3K papers, 5.9M citations

86% related

Eindhoven University of Technology
52.9K papers, 1.5M citations

86% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202317
202291
2021371
2020408
2019415
2018392