Institution
Paris Descartes University
Government•Paris, France•
About: Paris Descartes University is a government organization based out in Paris, France. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 20987 authors who have published 37456 publications receiving 1206222 citations. The organization is also known as: Université Paris V-Descartes & Université de Paris V.
Topics: Population, Transplantation, Immune system, Cancer, Pregnancy
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: There is little to choose between the atypical antipsychotic drugs, although olanzapine may cause fewer extrapyramidal adverse effects than other drugs in this category, and results between three to 12 months suggest a clinically important average gain of four kilograms for people given olanZapine.
Abstract: Background Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is reported to be effective without producing the disabling extrapyramidal side effects associated with the older, typical antipsychotic drugs. Objectives To determine the clinical effects and safety of olanzapine as compared with placebo, typical and other atypical antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and schizophreniform psychoses. Search strategy The reviewers undertook electronic searches of Biological Abstracts (1980-1999), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 1999), EMBASE (1980-1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), PsycLIT (1974-1999) and The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (October 2000). References of all identified studies were searched for further trials, and the reviewers contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies and authors of trials. Selection criteria All randomised clinical trials comparing olanzapine to placebo or any antipsychotic treatment for those with schizophrenia or schizophreniform psychoses. Data collection and analysis Data were independently extracted. For homogeneous dichotomous data the random effects relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence intervals (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data the reviewers calculated weighted mean differences. Main results Twenty one trials are included. Attrition from olanzapine versus placebo studies was so great (olanzapine - 61%, placebo - 73% by six weeks, RR 0.85 CI 0.7-0.98, NNT 8 CI 5-40) that interpretation of results is problematic. Olanzapine appeared superior to placebo at six weeks for the outcome of 'no important clinical response' (RR 0.88 CI 0.8-0.98, NNT 8 CI 5-27) and global mental state scores. Although dizziness and dry mouth were reported more frequently in the olanzapine-treated group, this did not reach statistical significance. Tthe olanzapine group gained more weight. When compared to typical antipsychotic drugs, data from several small trials are incomplete; but, for the short term outcome of 'no important clinical response', olanzapine seem as effective as typical antipsychotics (n=2778, RR 0.9 CI 0.76-1.06). Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) data tended to be equivocal but Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) rating of total score and negative and positive symptom sub-scores favoured olanzapine. With high attrition in both groups (olanzapine - 36%, typical drug - 49% by 6 weeks, n=2738, RR 0.85 CI 0.66-1.1; olanzapine - 83%, typical drug - 90% by 1 year, n=2738, RR 0.9 CI 0.86-1.02), the assumptions included in all continuous data are considerable. Participants allocated olanzapine experienced fewer extrapyramidal side effects than people given haloperidol. Weight change data for the short term are not conclusive (n=2455, WMD 0.8kg CI -0.6-2.2) but the three to 12 month results suggest an average gain of four kilograms (n=233, WMD 4 CI 0.3-7.8). It is difficult to distinguish between olanzapine and other atypical drugs, although it may cause fewer extrapyramidal side effects than risperidone (n=339, RR 0.6 CI 0.4-0.9, NNH 8 CI 4-29). Olanzapine did cause more weight gain than its comparators but current data are not statistically significant (3-12 months, n=535, WMD 2.2kg CI -0.6-5). One study (n=180) found no clear differences between olanzapine and clozapine for people with treatment-resistant illness. Reviewer's conclusions The large proportions of participants leaving the studies early, in the large multi-centre trials makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions on clinical effects. For people with schizophrenia olanzapine may offer antipsychotic efficacy with fewer extrapyramidal side effects than typical drugs but more weight gain. Large, long-term randomised trials with participants, interventions and primary outcomes that are familiar to those wishing to help those with schizophrenia are long overdue.
225 citations
••
TL;DR: The findings show the existence of an accurate mechanism to reduce the deleterious consequences of oxidative damage and point to an important role for PCNA and RP-A in determining a functional hierarchy among different DNA pols in lesion bypass.
Abstract: Specialized DNA polymerases (DNA pols) are required for lesion bypass in human cells. Auxiliary factors have an important, but so far poorly understood, role. Here we analyse the effects of human proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication protein A (RP-A) on six different human DNA pols--belonging to the B, Y and X classes--during in vitro bypass of different lesions. The mutagenic lesion 8-oxo-guanine (8-oxo-G) has high miscoding potential. A major and specific effect was found for 8-oxo-G bypass with DNA pols lambda and eta. PCNA and RP-A allowed correct incorporation of dCTP opposite a 8-oxo-G template 1,200-fold more efficiently than the incorrect dATP by DNA pol lambda, and 68-fold by DNA pol eta, respectively. Experiments with DNA-pol-lambda-null cell extracts suggested an important role for DNA pol lambda. On the other hand, DNA pol iota, together with DNA pols alpha, delta and beta, showed a much lower correct bypass efficiency. Our findings show the existence of an accurate mechanism to reduce the deleterious consequences of oxidative damage and, in addition, point to an important role for PCNA and RP-A in determining a functional hierarchy among different DNA pols in lesion bypass.
225 citations
••
TL;DR: The findings of this study raise a cautionary note regarding the safety of using combination antihypertensive therapy in frail elderly patients with low SBP, and dedicated, controlled interventional studies are warranted to assess the corresponding benefit to risk ratio in this growing population.
Abstract: Importance Clinical evidence supports the beneficial effects of lowering blood pressure (BP) levels in community-living, robust, hypertensive individuals older than 80 years. However, observational studies in frail elderly patients have shown no or even an inverse relationship between BP and morbidity and mortality. Objective To assess all-cause mortality in institutionalized individuals older than 80 years according to systolic BP (SBP) levels and number of antihypertensive drugs. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal study included elderly residents of nursing homes. The interaction between low ( Main Outcomes and Measures All-cause mortality over a 2-year follow-up period. Results A significant interaction was found between low SBP and treatment with 2 or more BP-lowering agents, resulting in a higher risk of mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.81; 95% CI, 1.36-2.41); adjusted HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.34-2.37; bothP Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study raise a cautionary note regarding the safety of using combination antihypertensive therapy in frail elderly patients with low SBP (
224 citations
••
Columbia University1, Columbia University Medical Center2, Cairo University3, University of Michigan4, Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital5, Charles University in Prague6, National Taiwan University7, Toronto General Hospital8, University of Toronto9, Papworth Hospital10, University of Queensland11, Montefiore Medical Center12, Cornell University13, Monash University14, Alfred Hospital15, Capital Medical University16, Abbott Northwestern Hospital17, Nippon Medical School18, Albert Einstein College of Medicine19, Maastricht University Medical Centre20, Royal Children's Hospital21, University Health System22, Auckland City Hospital23, Imperial College London24, Teikyo University25, University of Paris26, St. Michael's Hospital27, Paris Descartes University28
TL;DR: This document advocates for a multidisciplinary team of experts to guide institutional use of this therapy and the care of patients receiving it, and highlights key aspects of care delivery in this rapidly growing technology.
Abstract: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used increasingly for both respiratory and cardiac failure in adult patients. Indications for ECMO use in cardiac failure include severe refractory cardiogenic shock, refractory ventricular arrhythmia, active cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest, and acute or decompensated right heart failure. Evidence is emerging to guide the use of this therapy for some of these indications, but there remains a need for additional evidence to guide best practices. As a result, the use of ECMO may vary widely across centers. The purpose of this document is to highlight key aspects of care delivery, with the goal of codifying the current use of this rapidly growing technology. A major challenge in this field is the need to emergently deploy ECMO for cardiac failure, often with limited time to assess the appropriateness of patients for the intervention. For this reason, we advocate for a multidisciplinary team of experts to guide institutional use of this therapy and the care of patients receiving it. Rigorous patient selection and careful attention to potential complications are key factors in optimizing patient outcomes. Seamless patient transport and clearly defined pathways for transition of care to centers capable of providing heart replacement therapies (e.g., durable ventricular assist device or heart transplantation) are essential to providing the highest level of care for those patients stabilized by ECMO but unable to be weaned from the device. Ultimately, concentration of the most complex care at high-volume centers with advanced cardiac capabilities may be a way to significantly improve the care of this patient population.
224 citations
••
University of Glasgow1, University of Toronto2, Public Health Research Institute3, York University4, Medical Research Council5, University of Bristol6, University of London7, University of Ottawa8, Queen's University Belfast9, University of Victoria10, Université de Montréal11, Paris Descartes University12, University of British Columbia13, RMIT University14, University of Waterloo15
TL;DR: In this paper, Blake Poland, Valery Ridde, Jeannie Shoveller, Sarah Viehbeck, and Daniel Wight presented a method to identify the source of an attack.
Abstract: Additional co-authors: Blake Poland, Valery Ridde, Jeannie Shoveller, Sarah Viehbeck,and Daniel Wight
224 citations
Authors
Showing all 21023 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Guido Kroemer | 236 | 1404 | 246571 |
Cyrus Cooper | 204 | 1869 | 206782 |
Jean-Laurent Casanova | 144 | 842 | 76173 |
Alain Fischer | 143 | 770 | 81680 |
Maxime Dougados | 134 | 1054 | 69979 |
Carlos López-Otín | 126 | 494 | 83933 |
Giuseppe Viale | 123 | 740 | 72799 |
Thierry Poynard | 119 | 668 | 64548 |
Lorenzo Galluzzi | 118 | 477 | 71436 |
Shahrokh F. Shariat | 118 | 1637 | 58900 |
Richard E. Tremblay | 116 | 685 | 45844 |
Olivier Hermine | 111 | 1026 | 43779 |
Yehezkel Ben-Ari | 110 | 459 | 44293 |
Loïc Guillevin | 108 | 800 | 51085 |
Gérard Socié | 107 | 920 | 44186 |