scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Pompeu Fabra University

EducationBarcelona, Spain
About: Pompeu Fabra University is a education organization based out in Barcelona, Spain. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Context (language use). The organization has 8093 authors who have published 23570 publications receiving 858431 citations. The organization is also known as: Universitat Pompeu Fabra & UPF.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Gregory A. Roth1, Gregory A. Roth2, Degu Abate3, Kalkidan Hassen Abate4  +1025 moreInstitutions (333)
TL;DR: Non-communicable diseases comprised the greatest fraction of deaths, contributing to 73·4% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 72·5–74·1) of total deaths in 2017, while communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional causes accounted for 18·6% (17·9–19·6), and injuries 8·0% (7·7–8·2).

5,211 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Daniel J. Klionsky1, Kotb Abdelmohsen2, Akihisa Abe3, Joynal Abedin4  +2519 moreInstitutions (695)
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macro-autophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation, it is imperative to target by gene knockout or RNA interference more than one autophagy-related protein. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways implying that not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

5,187 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
14 Jun 2007-Nature
TL;DR: Functional data from multiple, diverse experiments performed on a targeted 1% of the human genome as part of the pilot phase of the ENCODE Project are reported, providing convincing evidence that the genome is pervasively transcribed, such that the majority of its bases can be found in primary transcripts.
Abstract: We report the generation and analysis of functional data from multiple, diverse experiments performed on a targeted 1% of the human genome as part of the pilot phase of the ENCODE Project. These data have been further integrated and augmented by a number of evolutionary and computational analyses. Together, our results advance the collective knowledge about human genome function in several major areas. First, our studies provide convincing evidence that the genome is pervasively transcribed, such that the majority of its bases can be found in primary transcripts, including non-protein-coding transcripts, and those that extensively overlap one another. Second, systematic examination of transcriptional regulation has yielded new understanding about transcription start sites, including their relationship to specific regulatory sequences and features of chromatin accessibility and histone modification. Third, a more sophisticated view of chromatin structure has emerged, including its inter-relationship with DNA replication and transcriptional regulation. Finally, integration of these new sources of information, in particular with respect to mammalian evolution based on inter- and intra-species sequence comparisons, has yielded new mechanistic and evolutionary insights concerning the functional landscape of the human genome. Together, these studies are defining a path for pursuit of a more comprehensive characterization of human genome function.

5,091 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Haidong Wang1, Mohsen Naghavi1, Christine Allen1, Ryan M Barber1  +841 moreInstitutions (293)
TL;DR: The Global Burden of Disease 2015 Study provides a comprehensive assessment of all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes in 195 countries and territories from 1980 to 2015, finding several countries in sub-Saharan Africa had very large gains in life expectancy, rebounding from an era of exceedingly high loss of life due to HIV/AIDS.

4,804 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Sarah Djebali, Carrie A. Davis1, Angelika Merkel, Alexander Dobin1, Timo Lassmann, Ali Mortazavi2, Ali Mortazavi3, Andrea Tanzer, Julien Lagarde, Wei Lin1, Felix Schlesinger1, Chenghai Xue1, Georgi K. Marinov2, Jainab Khatun4, Brian A. Williams2, Chris Zaleski1, Joel Rozowsky5, Marion S. Röder, Felix Kokocinski6, Rehab F. Abdelhamid, Tyler Alioto, Igor Antoshechkin2, Michael T. Baer1, Nadav Bar7, Philippe Batut1, Kimberly Bell1, Ian Bell8, Sudipto K. Chakrabortty1, Xian Chen9, Jacqueline Chrast10, Joao Curado, Thomas Derrien, Jorg Drenkow1, Erica Dumais8, Jacqueline Dumais8, Radha Duttagupta8, Emilie Falconnet11, Meagan Fastuca1, Kata Fejes-Toth1, Pedro G. Ferreira, Sylvain Foissac8, Melissa J. Fullwood12, Hui Gao8, David Gonzalez, Assaf Gordon1, Harsha P. Gunawardena9, Cédric Howald10, Sonali Jha1, Rory Johnson, Philipp Kapranov8, Brandon King2, Colin Kingswood, Oscar Junhong Luo12, Eddie Park3, Kimberly Persaud1, Jonathan B. Preall1, Paolo Ribeca, Brian A. Risk4, Daniel Robyr11, Michael Sammeth, Lorian Schaffer2, Lei-Hoon See1, Atif Shahab12, Jørgen Skancke7, Ana Maria Suzuki, Hazuki Takahashi, Hagen Tilgner13, Diane Trout2, Nathalie Walters10, Huaien Wang1, John A. Wrobel4, Yanbao Yu9, Xiaoan Ruan12, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Jennifer Harrow6, Mark Gerstein5, Tim Hubbard6, Alexandre Reymond10, Stylianos E. Antonarakis11, Gregory J. Hannon1, Morgan C. Giddings9, Morgan C. Giddings4, Yijun Ruan12, Barbara J. Wold2, Piero Carninci, Roderic Guigó14, Thomas R. Gingeras1, Thomas R. Gingeras8 
06 Sep 2012-Nature
TL;DR: Evidence that three-quarters of the human genome is capable of being transcribed is reported, as well as observations about the range and levels of expression, localization, processing fates, regulatory regions and modifications of almost all currently annotated and thousands of previously unannotated RNAs that prompt a redefinition of the concept of a gene.
Abstract: Eukaryotic cells make many types of primary and processed RNAs that are found either in specific subcellular compartments or throughout the cells. A complete catalogue of these RNAs is not yet available and their characteristic subcellular localizations are also poorly understood. Because RNA represents the direct output of the genetic information encoded by genomes and a significant proportion of a cell's regulatory capabilities are focused on its synthesis, processing, transport, modification and translation, the generation of such a catalogue is crucial for understanding genome function. Here we report evidence that three-quarters of the human genome is capable of being transcribed, as well as observations about the range and levels of expression, localization, processing fates, regulatory regions and modifications of almost all currently annotated and thousands of previously unannotated RNAs. These observations, taken together, prompt a redefinition of the concept of a gene.

4,450 citations


Authors

Showing all 8248 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Andrei Shleifer171514271880
Paul Elliott153773103839
Bert Brunekreef12480681938
Philippe Aghion12250773438
Anjana Rao11833761395
Jordi Sunyer11579857211
Kenneth J. Arrow113411111221
Xavier Estivill11067359568
Roderic Guigó108304106914
Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen10764749080
Jordi Alonso10752364058
Alfonso Valencia10654255192
Luis Serrano10545242515
Vadim N. Gladyshev10249034148
Josep M. Antó10049338663
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
University College London
210.6K papers, 9.8M citations

90% related

University of Pennsylvania
257.6K papers, 14.1M citations

90% related

Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

90% related

University of Amsterdam
140.8K papers, 5.9M citations

89% related

University of Edinburgh
151.6K papers, 6.6M citations

89% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202349
2022248
20211,903
20201,930
20191,763
20181,660