scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

FacilityPotsdam, Germany
About: Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research is a facility organization based out in Potsdam, Germany. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Climate change & Global warming. The organization has 1519 authors who have published 5098 publications receiving 367023 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, a tentative conclusion can be drawn that ambitious climate change mitigation need not drive up global food prices much, if the extra land required for bioenergy production is accessible or if the feedstock from forests does not directly compete for agricultural land.

120 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Tamsin L. Edwards1, Sophie Nowicki2, Sophie Nowicki3, Ben Marzeion4, Regine Hock5, Regine Hock6, Heiko Goelzer7, Heiko Goelzer8, Heiko Goelzer9, Helene Seroussi10, Nicolas C. Jourdain11, Donald Slater12, Donald Slater13, Donald Slater14, Fiona Turner1, Christopher J. Smith15, Christopher J. Smith16, Christine M. McKenna16, Erika Simon3, Ayako Abe-Ouchi17, Jonathan M. Gregory18, Jonathan M. Gregory19, Eric Larour10, William H. Lipscomb20, Antony J. Payne21, Andrew Shepherd16, Cécile Agosta22, Patrick Alexander23, Patrick Alexander24, Torsten Albrecht25, Brian Anderson26, Xylar Asay-Davis27, Andy Aschwanden5, Alice Barthel27, Andrew Bliss28, Reinhard Calov25, Christopher Chambers29, Nicolas Champollion4, Nicolas Champollion11, Youngmin Choi30, Youngmin Choi10, Richard I. Cullather3, J. K. Cuzzone10, Christophe Dumas22, Denis Felikson31, Denis Felikson3, Xavier Fettweis32, Koji Fujita33, Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi34, Benjamin K. Galton-Fenzi35, Rupert Gladstone36, Nicholas R. Golledge26, Ralf Greve29, Tore Hattermann37, Tore Hattermann38, Matthew J. Hoffman27, Angelika Humbert39, Angelika Humbert4, Matthias Huss40, Matthias Huss41, Matthias Huss42, Philippe Huybrechts43, Walter W. Immerzeel8, Thomas Kleiner39, Philip Kraaijenbrink8, Sébastien Le clec'h43, Victoria Lee21, Gunter R. Leguy20, Christopher M. Little, Daniel P. Lowry44, Jan Hendrik Malles4, Daniel F. Martin45, Fabien Maussion46, Mathieu Morlighem30, James F. O’Neill1, Isabel Nias3, Isabel Nias47, Frank Pattyn9, Tyler Pelle30, Stephen Price27, Aurélien Quiquet22, Valentina Radić48, Ronja Reese25, David R. Rounce5, David R. Rounce49, Martin Rückamp39, Akiko Sakai33, Courtney Shafer45, Nicole Schlegel10, Sarah Shannon21, Robin S. Smith19, Fiammetta Straneo13, Sainan Sun9, Lev Tarasov50, Luke D. Trusel51, Jonas Van Breedam43, Roderik S. W. van de Wal8, Michiel R. van den Broeke8, Ricarda Winkelmann52, Ricarda Winkelmann25, Harry Zekollari, Cheng Zhao34, Tong Zhang27, Tong Zhang53, Thomas Zwinger54 
King's College London1, University at Buffalo2, Goddard Space Flight Center3, University of Bremen4, University of Alaska Fairbanks5, University of Oslo6, Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research7, Utrecht University8, Université libre de Bruxelles9, California Institute of Technology10, University of Grenoble11, University of Edinburgh12, University of California, San Diego13, University of St Andrews14, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis15, University of Leeds16, University of Tokyo17, Met Office18, University of Reading19, National Center for Atmospheric Research20, University of Bristol21, Université Paris-Saclay22, Columbia University23, Goddard Institute for Space Studies24, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research25, Victoria University of Wellington26, Los Alamos National Laboratory27, Colorado State University28, Hokkaido University29, University of California, Irvine30, Universities Space Research Association31, University of Liège32, Nagoya University33, University of Tasmania34, Australian Antarctic Division35, University of Lapland36, Norwegian Polar Institute37, University of Tromsø38, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research39, University of Fribourg40, ETH Zurich41, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research42, Vrije Universiteit Brussel43, GNS Science44, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory45, University of Innsbruck46, University of Liverpool47, University of British Columbia48, Carnegie Mellon University49, Memorial University of Newfoundland50, Pennsylvania State University51, University of Potsdam52, Beijing Normal University53, CSC – IT Center for Science54
06 May 2021-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the authors estimate probability distributions for these projections under the new scenarios using statistical emulation of the ice sheet and glacier models, and find that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would halve the land ice contribution to twenty-first-century sea level rise, relative to current emissions pledges.
Abstract: The land ice contribution to global mean sea level rise has not yet been predicted1 using ice sheet and glacier models for the latest set of socio-economic scenarios, nor using coordinated exploration of uncertainties arising from the various computer models involved. Two recent international projects generated a large suite of projections using multiple models2,3,4,5,6,7,8, but primarily used previous-generation scenarios9 and climate models10, and could not fully explore known uncertainties. Here we estimate probability distributions for these projections under the new scenarios11,12 using statistical emulation of the ice sheet and glacier models. We find that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would halve the land ice contribution to twenty-first-century sea level rise, relative to current emissions pledges. The median decreases from 25 to 13 centimetres sea level equivalent (SLE) by 2100, with glaciers responsible for half the sea level contribution. The projected Antarctic contribution does not show a clear response to the emissions scenario, owing to uncertainties in the competing processes of increasing ice loss and snowfall accumulation in a warming climate. However, under risk-averse (pessimistic) assumptions, Antarctic ice loss could be five times higher, increasing the median land ice contribution to 42 centimetres SLE under current policies and pledges, with the 95th percentile projection exceeding half a metre even under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming. This would severely limit the possibility of mitigating future coastal flooding. Given this large range (between 13 centimetres SLE using the main projections under 1.5 degrees Celsius warming and 42 centimetres SLE using risk-averse projections under current pledges), adaptation planning for twenty-first-century sea level rise must account for a factor-of-three uncertainty in the land ice contribution until climate policies and the Antarctic response are further constrained.

120 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The present paper evaluates the current state of integrated water quality modelling, major research needs to assess and reduce model uncertainties, and opportunities to enhance model predictive capacity are examined.
Abstract: There is an increasing pressure for development of integrated water quality models that effectively couple catchment and in-stream biogeochemical processes. This need stems from increasing legislative requirements and emerging demands related to contemporary climate and land use changes. Modelling water quality and nutrient transport is challenging due a number of serious constraints associated with the input data as well as existing knowledge gaps related to the mathematical description of landscape and in-stream biogeochemical processes. The present paper summarizes the discussions held during the workshop on ‘Integrated water quality modelling: future demands and perspectives’ (Magdeburg, Germany, 23–24 June 2008). Our primary focus is placed on the current limitations and future challenges in water quality modelling. In particular, we evaluate the current state of integrated water quality modelling, we highlight major research needs to assess and reduce model uncertainties, and we examine opportunities to enhance model predictive capacity. To better account for the need of upscaling process knowledge, we advocate the adoption of combined process-oriented field and modelling studies at representative sites. In-stream nutrient metabolism investigations at the entire range of stream and river scales will enable the improvement of the mathematical representation of these processes and therefore the articulation level of coupled watershed-receiving waterbody models. Keeping the complexity of integrated water quality models in mind, the development of novel uncertainty analysis techniques for rigorous assessing parameter identification and model credibility is essential. In this regard, we recommend the use of Bayesian calibration frameworks that explicitly accommodate measurement errors, parameter uncertainties, and model structure errors. The Bayesian inference can be used to quantify the information the data contain about model inputs, to offer insights into the covariance structure among parameter estimates, to obtain predictions along with credible intervals for model outputs, and to effectively address the ‘change of support’ problems

120 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a diverse group of stakeholders with expertise in climate science, engineering, economics, policy, and port management have highlighted the climate change challenge for ports and suggested a way forward through the adoption of some initial measures.
Abstract: With 80 % of world trade carried by sea, seaports provide crucial linkages in global supply-chains and are essential for the ability of all countries to access global markets. Seaports are likely to be affected directly and indirectly by climatic changes, with broader implications for international trade and development. Due to their coastal location, seaports are particularly vulnerable to extreme weather events associated with increasing sea levels and tropical storm activity, as illustrated by hurricane “Sandy”. In view of their strategic role as part of the globalized trading system, adapting ports in different parts of the world to the impacts of climate change is of considerable importance. Reflecting the views of a diverse group of stakeholders with expertise in climate science, engineering, economics, policy, and port management, this essay highlights the climate change challenge for ports and suggests a way forward through the adoption of some initial measures. These include both “soft” and “hard” adaptations that may be spearheaded by individual port entities, but will require collaboration and support from a broad range of public and private sector stakeholders and from society at large. In particular, the essay highlights a need to shift to more holistic planning, investment and operation.

120 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the trade-offs between land and water requirements of large-scale bioenergy production and find that producing 300 EJ yr 1 of bioenergy in 2095 from dedicated bioenergy crops is likely to double agricultural water withdrawals if no explicit water protection policies are implemented.
Abstract: Bioenergy is expected to play an important role in the future energy mix as it can substitute fossil fuels and contribute to climate change mitigation. However, large-scale bioenergy cultivation may put substantial pressure on land and water resources. While irrigated bioenergy production can reduce the pressure on land due to higher yields, associated irrigation water requirements may lead to degradation of freshwater ecosystems and to conflicts with other potential users. In this article, we investigate the trade-offs between land and water requirements of large-scale bioenergy production. To this end, we adopt an exogenous demand trajectory for bioenergy from dedicated energy crops, targeted at limiting greenhouse gas emissions in the energy sector to 1100 Gt carbon dioxide equivalent until 2095. We then use the spatially explicit global land- and water-use allocation model MAgPIE to project the implications of this bioenergy target for global land and water resources. We find that producing 300 EJ yr 1 of bioenergy in 2095 from dedicated bioenergy crops is likely to double agricultural water withdrawals if no explicit water protection policies are implemented. Since current human water withdrawals are dominated by agriculture and already lead to ecosystem degradation and biodiversity loss, such a doubling will pose a severe threat to freshwater ecosystems. If irrigated bioenergy production is prohibited to prevent negative impacts of bioenergy cultivation on water resources, bioenergy land requirements for meeting a 300 EJ yr 1 bioenergy target increase substantially (+ 41%) – mainly at the expense of pasture areas and tropical forests. Thus, avoiding negative environmental impacts of large-scale bioenergy production will require policies that balance associated water and land requirements.

119 citations


Authors

Showing all 1589 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Carl Folke133360125990
Adam Drewnowski10648641107
Jürgen Kurths105103862179
Markus Reichstein10338653385
Stephen Polasky9935459148
Sandy P. Harrison9632934004
Owen B. Toon9442432237
Stephen Sitch9426252236
Yong Xu88139139268
Dieter Neher8542426225
Johan Rockström8523657842
Jonathan A. Foley8514470710
Robert J. Scholes8425337019
Christoph Müller8245727274
Robert J. Nicholls7951535729
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
7.2K papers, 449.5K citations

88% related

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
6.2K papers, 426.7K citations

87% related

University of Alaska Fairbanks
17K papers, 750.5K citations

86% related

Lamont–Doherty Earth Observatory
8K papers, 504.5K citations

85% related

National Center for Atmospheric Research
19.7K papers, 1.4M citations

85% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
2023101
2022107
2021479
2020486
2019332
2018355