Institution
Protestant Theological University
Education•Kampen, Netherlands•
About: Protestant Theological University is a education organization based out in Kampen, Netherlands. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Religious education & Protestantism. The organization has 86 authors who have published 188 publications receiving 889 citations.
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: This paper argued that there is a true reciprocity between personal spirituality and the sense of God as really other, and argued that renewed attention for the human condition in the theological debates of the last decades should also include a positive stand towards the believer's spiritual awareness of God's real existence and presence.
Abstract: Does preaching bring God on stage? Protestants assume an intimate relationship between the ‘Word of God’ and preaching. However, the principle that ‘preaching of the Word of God is the Word of God’ caused intense debates about the status of God language. The author highlights the classic disputes of the 19th and 20th centuries and argues that the old dilemma must be overcome. Sermons address the subjective-contextual conditions of the listeners, and this in no way precludes the attention for divine disclosure. On the contrary, there is a true reciprocity between personal spirituality and the sense of God as really other. The author defends the thesis that the renewed attention for the human condition in the theological debates of the last decades should also include a positive stand towards the believer’s spiritual awareness of God’s real existence and presence.
4 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discuss the view of the Leiden professor Paul Cliteur that human rights are essentially secular and require rejection of God's will as source of moral authority, and explore the possibility to ground human rights directly in God's justice by construing creation, the giving of the Ten Commandments and the justification of the sinner as central divine acts of justice.
Abstract: This article discusses the view of the Leiden professor Paul Cliteur that human rights are essentially secular and require rejection of God’s will as source of moral authority. Firstly, it analyses Cliteur’s reception of Kant and his claim that an exclusively anthropological grounding of human rights is the only possible one. Next, it investigates Nicholas Wolterstorff’s criticism of Kant’s grounding of human dignity in the rational capacity of mankind and his theistic grounding of human rights in God’s love by the mediating concept of human worth. Although Wolterstorff rightly believes that God’s special relationship with human beings is ultimately the best ground for human rights, his understandings of God’s love and of human worth appear to be problematic. Finally, the article explores the possibility to ground human rights directly in God’s justice by construing creation, the giving of the Ten Commandments and the justification of the sinner as central divine acts of justice in which God has given human rights to all human beings.
4 citations
••
TL;DR: The authors argue that despite the many pastoral merits of Swinton's thinking on these subjects, his theology of time and memory is unsatisfactory as far as his interpretation of the relevant terms is concerned.
Abstract: In two recent publications the practical theologian John Swinton has given extensive attention to the concepts of time and memory. He considers in what way these have a bearing on how, in Western culture, we view and treat people with disabilities or other kinds of impairment. The authors of this article argue that despite the many pastoral merits of Swinton's thinking on these subjects, his theology of time and memory is unsatisfactory as far as his interpretation of the relevant terms is concerned. Especially his appeal to the doctrine of divine timelessness which is shown to be flawed and unnecessary for his overall argument. A rejoinder to this article is presented by John Swinton at https://doi.org/10.1558/hscc.40527 and also in the print issue (HSCC 8.1).
4 citations
••
TL;DR: The modern life course is described as a "choice biography" as discussed by the authors, and rationality and control, and life planning and self-management are central notions in modern individualism.
Abstract: The modern life course is described as a 'choice biography.' Rationality and control, and life planning and self-management are central notions. Instead of rejecting the notion categorically, this article opts for a more balanced approach. The Protestant tradition shares central characteristics with choice biography, as Calvin, Edwards, and Bunyan show. However, there are dissimilarities as well. Fundamental in 'choice biography' is its lack of transcendence. Modern individualism threatens to collapse into one-dimensional secularism and egoism. In retrieving Kierkegaard's legacy, the notion 'choice biography' might undergo a critical re-appraisal. In his philosophy, we find both the absolute value of the individual's choices, and a plea for transcendence.
4 citations
••
04 Mar 2019TL;DR: In most congregations, children participate in worship in various ways as mentioned in this paper, and the question of how to describe and understand the variety in practices of worship with children is also raised.
Abstract: In most congregations, children participate in worship in various ways. In this article we pose the question: how can we describe and understand the variety in practices of worship with children? T...
4 citations
Authors
Showing all 95 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
Erik Olsman | 9 | 33 | 360 |
Marcel Barnard | 7 | 44 | 162 |
Erik Sengers | 6 | 18 | 81 |
A. (Jos) de Kock | 6 | 12 | 90 |
Maarten Wisse | 6 | 25 | 122 |
Martin N. Walton | 5 | 9 | 70 |
Jos de Kock | 5 | 18 | 83 |
Pieter Vos | 5 | 13 | 65 |
Theo A. Boer | 5 | 14 | 65 |
Marten van der Meulen | 5 | 9 | 63 |
J. de Hart | 4 | 4 | 61 |
Ronelle Sonnenberg | 4 | 16 | 48 |
Frits de Lange | 4 | 13 | 30 |
Rob Compaijen | 4 | 16 | 28 |
Pieter B. Hartog | 4 | 8 | 47 |