Institution
Rabin Medical Center
Healthcare•Petah Tikva, Israel•
About: Rabin Medical Center is a healthcare organization based out in Petah Tikva, Israel. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Transplantation. The organization has 6026 authors who have published 9924 publications receiving 270404 citations.
Topics: Population, Transplantation, Pregnancy, Myocardial infarction, Cancer
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
Turku University Hospital1, National University of Ireland, Galway2, University of Catania3, University of Naples Federico II4, University of Paris5, Bispebjerg Hospital6, University of Sheffield7, University of Cambridge8, Stavanger University Hospital9, Oslo University Hospital10, Hospital Clínico San Carlos11, Mayo Clinic12, University of Western Brittany13, Rabin Medical Center14, Slovak Medical University15, Saarland University16, University of Barcelona17, University of Brescia18, University of Bern19, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg20, Leiden University Medical Center21
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present guidelines for the management of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), which is a pathological process characterized by atherosclerotic plaque accumulation in the epicardial arteries.
Abstract: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a pathological process characterized by atherosclerotic plaque accumulation in the epicardial arteries, whether obstructive or non-obstructive. This process can be modified by lifestyle adjustments, pharmacological therapies, and invasive interventions designed to achieve disease stabilization or regression. The disease can have long, stable periods but can also become unstable at any time, typically due to an acute atherothrombotic event caused by plaque rupture or erosion. However, the disease is chronic, most often progressive, and hence serious, even in clinically apparently silent periods. The dynamic nature of the CAD process results in various clinical presentations, which can be conveniently categorized as either acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). The Guidelines presented here refer to the management of patients with CCS. The natural history of CCS is illustrated in Figure 1.
3,448 citations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center1, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center2, Harvard University3, Fox Chase Cancer Center4, University of Strasbourg5, Queen Mary University of London6, Aarhus University7, Tel Aviv University8, Rabin Medical Center9, University of British Columbia10, Roswell Park Cancer Institute11, Cancer Research UK12, University of Jena13, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul14, Niigata University15, Complutense University of Madrid16, Cleveland Clinic17, Bristol-Myers Squibb18, Johns Hopkins University19, Macquarie University20, Université Paris-Saclay21
TL;DR: Overall survival and objective response rates were significantly higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with sunitinib among intermediate‐ and poor‐risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal‐cell carcinoma.
Abstract: Background Nivolumab plus ipilimumab produced objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma in a pilot study. This phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib for previously untreated clear-cell advanced renal-cell carcinoma. Methods We randomly assigned adults in a 1:1 ratio to receive either nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks, or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The coprimary end points were overall survival (alpha level, 0.04), objective response rate (alpha level, 0.001), and progression-free survival (alpha level, 0.009) among patients with intermediate or poor prognostic risk. Results A total of 1096 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (550 patients) or sunitinib (546 patients); 425 and 422, respectively, had intermediate or poor risk. At a median follo...
2,984 citations
Spanish National Research Council1, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens2, Rabin Medical Center3, University of Münster4, Charles University in Prague5, Sapienza University of Rome6, University of Turin7, Medical University of Lublin8, Peking University9, Harvard University10, Millennium Pharmaceuticals11, Johnson & Johnson12
TL;DR: Bortezomib plus melphalan-prednisone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy was superior to melphAlan-predisonsone alone.
Abstract: The time to progression among patients receiving bortezomib plus melphalan– prednisone (bortezomib group) was 24.0 months, as compared with 16.6 months among those receiving melphalan–prednisone alone (control group) (hazard ratio for the bortezomib group, 0.48; P<0.001). The proportions of patients with a partial response or better were 71% in the bortezomib group and 35% in the control group; complete-response rates were 30% and 4%, respectively (P<0.001). The median duration of the response was 19.9 months in the bortezomib group and 13.1 months in the control group. The hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.61 for the bortezomib group (P = 0.008). Adverse events were consistent with established profiles of toxic events associated with bortezomib and melphalan–prednisone. Grade 3 events occurred in a higher proportion of patients in the bortezomib group than in the control group (53% vs. 44%, P = 0.02), but there were no significant differences in grade 4 events (28% and 27%, respectively) or treatment-related deaths (1% and 2%). Conclusions Bortezomib plus melphalan–prednisone was superior to melphalan–prednisone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who were ineligible for high-dose therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00111319.)
1,728 citations
Rabin Medical Center1, University of Tartu2, University of Lausanne3, McMaster University4, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust5, The Catholic University of America6, Geneva College7, Université libre de Bruxelles8, Jagiellonian University Medical College9, University of Hohenheim10
TL;DR: Particular conditions frequently observed in intensive care such as patients with dysphagia, frail patients, multiple trauma patients, abdominal surgery, sepsis, and obesity are discussed to guide the practitioner toward the best evidence based therapy.
1,474 citations
TL;DR: Responses to olaparib were observed across different tumor types associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations, and warrants further investigation in confirmatory studies.
Abstract: Purpose Olaparib is an oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor with activity in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) –associated breast and ovarian cancers. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of olaparib in a spectrum of BRCA1/2-associated cancers. Patients and Methods This multicenter phase II study enrolled individuals with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation and recurrent cancer. Eligibility included ovarian cancer resistant to prior platinum; breast cancer with ≥ three chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease; pancreatic cancer with prior gemcitabine treatment; or prostate cancer with progression on hormonal and one systemic therapy. Olaparib was administered at 400 mg twice per day. The primary efficacy end point was tumor response rate. Results A total of 298 patients received treatment and were evaluable. The tumor response rate was 26.2% (78 of 298; 95% CI, 21.3 to 31.6) overall and 31.1% (60 of 193; 95% CI, 24.6 to 38.1), 12.9% (eight of 62; 95% CI, 5.7 to 23.9), 21.7% (five of 23; 95% CI, 7.5 to...
1,423 citations
Authors
Showing all 6043 results
| Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert M. Califf | 196 | 1561 | 167961 |
| Eric J. Topol | 193 | 1373 | 151025 |
| Moshe Oren | 125 | 340 | 57669 |
| Barry M. Brenner | 121 | 540 | 65006 |
| Howard I. Maibach | 116 | 1821 | 60765 |
| Paul W. Armstrong | 114 | 811 | 79389 |
| Robert E. Coleman | 103 | 724 | 49796 |
| Martine Piccart | 103 | 613 | 50072 |
| Nir Giladi | 98 | 471 | 37237 |
| Jonathan Cohen | 89 | 326 | 35384 |
| Zev Rosenwaks | 89 | 772 | 32039 |
| Surinder K. Batra | 87 | 564 | 30653 |
| Jonathan Myers | 82 | 663 | 29716 |
| Abraham Weizman | 81 | 1011 | 31083 |
| Amos D. Korczyn | 80 | 582 | 32820 |