scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Institution

RAND Corporation

NonprofitSanta Monica, California, United States
About: RAND Corporation is a nonprofit organization based out in Santa Monica, California, United States. It is known for research contribution in the topics: Population & Health care. The organization has 9602 authors who have published 18570 publications receiving 744658 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Instruments examined include the Quality of Well-Being Scale, the HIV Overview of Problems/Evaluation System, the COOP Charts, and six Medical Outcomes Study-based measures: the SF-20, SF-30, AIDS-HAQ,SF-36,sf-38 and SF-56.
Abstract: This paper provides a selective review of instruments currently being employed to evaluate generic health-related quality of life in studies of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Instruments examined include the Quality of Well-Being Scale, the HIV Overview of Problems/Evaluation System, the COOP Charts, and six Medical Outcomes Study-based measures: the SF-20, SF-30, AIDS-HAQ, SF-36, SF-38 and SF-56. Relative strengths and weaknesses of the measures are discussed.

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Targeting hospitals that serve predominantly minority patients, improving the access of minority patients to better hospitals, and targeting the experiences of Asians within hospitals may be promising means of reducing disparities in patient experience are suggested.
Abstract: Using HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, also known as the CAHPS Hospital Survey) data from 2,684 hospitals, the authors compare the experiences of Hispanic, African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, American Indian/Alaska Native, and multiracial inpatients with those of non-Hispanic White inpatients to understand the roles of between- and within-hospital differences in patients' perspectives of hospital care. The study finds that, on average, non-Hispanic White inpatients receive care at hospitals that provide better experiences for all patients than the hospitals more often used by minority patients. Within hospitals, patient experiences are more similar by race/ethnicity, though some disparities do exist, especially for Asians. This research suggests that targeting hospitals that serve predominantly minority patients, improving the access of minority patients to better hospitals, and targeting the experiences of Asians within hospitals may be promising means of reducing disparities in patient experience.

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A new Stata command, boost, is introduced that implements the boosting algorithm described in Hastie, Tibshirani, and Friedman (2001, 322) and accommodates Gaussian (normal), logistic, and Poisson boosted regression.
Abstract: Boosting, or boosted regression, is a recent data-mining technique that has shown considerable success in predictive accuracy. This article gives an overview of boosting and introduces a new Stata ...

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The reliability results were used to estimate the proportion of physicians in each specialty whose cost performance would be classified inaccurately in a two-tiered insurance product in which the physicians with cost profiles in the lowest quartile were labeled as "lower cost."
Abstract: BACKGROUND Insurance products with incentives for patients to choose physicians classified as offering lower-cost care on the basis of cost-profiling tools are increasingly common. However, no rigorous evaluation has been undertaken to determine whether these tools can accurately distinguish higher-cost physicians from lower-cost physicians. METHODS We aggregated claims data for the years 2004 and 2005 from four health plans in Massachusetts. We used commercial software to construct clinically homogeneous episodes of care (e.g., treatment of diabetes, heart attack, or urinary tract infection), assigned each episode to a physician, and created a summary profile of resource use (i.e., cost) for each physician on the basis of all assigned episodes. We estimated the reliability (signal-to-noise ratio) of each physician’s cost-profile score on a scale of 0 to 1, with 0 indicating that all differences in physicians’ cost profiles are due to a lack of precision in the measure (noise) and 1 indicating that all differences are due to real variation in costs of services (signal). We used the reliability results to estimate the proportion of physicians in each specialty whose cost performance would be classified inaccurately in a two-tiered insurance product in which the physicians with cost profiles in the lowest quartile were labeled as “lower cost.” RESULTS Median reliabilities ranged from 0.05 for vascular surgery to 0.79 for gastroenterology and otolaryngology. Overall, 59% of physicians had cost-profile scores with reliabilities of less than 0.70, a commonly used marker of suboptimal reliability. Using our reliability results, we estimated that 22% of physicians would be misclassified in a two-tiered system. CONCLUSIONS Current methods for profiling physicians with respect to costs of services may produce misleading results.

159 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss two methods for generating random vectors from a multivariate normal population with a specified variance-covariance matrix, and compare them with the two methods described in this paper.
Abstract: : The simulation of a process may require the use of sampling techniques involving the generation of random vectors from a multivariate normal population with a specified variance-covariance matrix. This is an expository paper which discusses two methods for generating such vectors. (Author)

159 citations


Authors

Showing all 9660 results

NameH-indexPapersCitations
Darien Wood1602174136596
Herbert A. Simon157745194597
Ron D. Hays13578182285
Paul G. Shekelle132601101639
John E. Ware121327134031
Linda Darling-Hammond10937459518
Robert H. Brook10557143743
Clifford Y. Ko10451437029
Lotfi A. Zadeh104331148857
Claudio Ronco102131272828
Joseph P. Newhouse10148447711
Kenneth B. Wells10048447479
Moyses Szklo9942847487
Alan M. Zaslavsky9844458335
Graham J. Hutchings9799544270
Network Information
Related Institutions (5)
Columbia University
224K papers, 12.8M citations

88% related

Johns Hopkins University
249.2K papers, 14M citations

88% related

University of Michigan
342.3K papers, 17.6M citations

88% related

University of Washington
305.5K papers, 17.7M citations

88% related

Stanford University
320.3K papers, 21.8M citations

86% related

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Institution in previous years
YearPapers
202311
202277
2021640
2020574
2019548
2018491